Hubert Humphrey

 Hubert Humphrey

Hubert Humphrey was the Vice President of Johnson in the 1964 election. Humphrey was not a racist being a part of helping the Civil Rights Movement. Humphrey was actually anti-segregation and in favor of the Civil Rights Movement.

Humphrey would decide to be the Presidential candidate in 1968 and competed against Nixon. Despite Nixon having substantial help from the establishment in 1965-1968 to make it seem that he was the ideal candidate to end the Vietnam war and riots, Humphrey made an attempt to defeat Nixon. Nixon may have helped escalate the Vietnam war, been involved in causing riots and looting through Hoover and the FBI, helped create marxist groups and/or funded them, and may have also intimidated Johnson to make illogical legislation and decisions concerning Vietnam and Community Action Programs. 

This was while marxists protested the Vietnam War in order to decrease Johnson's popularity due to the 1964's Civil Rights Movement legislation having passed and 1965 Voter Registration Act. The media also attacked Johnson and Humphrey while giving time in the news for H. Rap Brown to foment conflict. Despite having so much opposition in the idolatrous establishment of his time, Humphrey was close to beating Nixon by less than 1%. 43.4 to 42.7 percent. Nixon used Wallace to be an alternative to Humphrey being pro-union, anti-bureaucracy, and appearing to be protestant in order to take votes from Humphrey. Because Wallace was a third party candidate, Wallace had 13.5 percent of the vote or close to 10 million votes that would have gone to Humphrey. (This was to give Nixon the election and not to give an alternative to voters.)

Humphrey decided to differ from Johnson concerning the Vietnam war and said that there was the need to prevent warfare. Humphrey had seen that Johnson had decided to not run for presidency yet had bravery to take the challenge (Johnson was probably intimidated by Hoover seeing how Civil Rights Leaders were being removed.) Johnson also attacked and discouraged Humphrey while Humphrey was campaigning to keep fighting for democracy (Johnson actually discouraged his Vice President instead of encouraging him.) Humphrey also had 250 marxists shouting over him at his speeches. (Nixon?) Even against all of that, Humphrey almost beat Nixon. The silver lining is that Humphrey was able to keep being Senator for more than a decade after the election, and Nixon would be caught with the FBI in Watergate. Nixon knew that the 1972 Democratic nominee was probably going to beat him again. Watergate was Nixon's attempt to create a one party system in the US because the Democrats were probably going to win in 1972. Nixon told the FBI to break into the Democrat Headquarters, steal information, bug the installations, and lie. Nixon and the FBI were found out. Humphrey like Spiro Agnew may not have been president but at least they were able to survive. Agnew also was prevented from being President because he was a decent, non-racist, and good person who was not a part of Watergate. Humphrey was a decent and humble individual who took it to the establishment and did not falter. Humphrey may have been a reason Nixon feared the 1972 elections and decided for Watergate. Despite Humphrey not winning the election, Nixon resigned in 1974. (Humphrey did not fear and fought for Democracy. We can see that fighting for good does make a difference. Humphrey instead of allowing Nixon an easy election in 1968, knowing that the odds were not favorable, and most likely was tempted or intimidated to take it easy on the campaign trail, decided to fight against the machine or establishment. Humphrey accomplished so much for fighting against the marxist socialist non-compete mafia.)

Humphrey Was Reviled and Intimidated While Giving Speeches at the Democratic Conventions

When Humphrey was giving speeches at the Democratic conventions, he was reviled and shouted against by racist marxists probably working for Nixon. On one occassion, there were more than 250 racist hippies yelling at Humphrey to prevent him from speaking truth. Humphrey had spoken with authenticity. Humphrey described how the US needed to persevere with ethics and without racism. Humphrey described how both Nixon and Wallace were racist and were difficult to tell apart. Humphrey called Nixon, Wallace's imitator. (This is true since Wallace tried to impede an African American student from going to university, and Nixon used Wallace as a third party candidate to prevent Humphrey from winning the 1968 election. Nixon was also using racist marxists to foment division and conflict and make it seem that segregation was a better option since the Civil Rights Movement had "led to nationalism". Wallace was used by Nixon describing that Nixon was a racist. The racist nationalists were FBI agents and were inciting others to loot and riot. It was actually black panthers, weatherman, and marxists who were working for Nixon who were inciting riots and looting attempting to lead others to rioting and looting. It was not Civil Rights Activists and Christians. Civil Rights Activists and Christians were impeding a race war.) Because Humphrey was authentic and real, probably Nixon sent 250 marxists to shout over him so that individuals could not hear him. Humphrey was reviled with non-sense and temper tantrums, and yet kept fighting for freedom and democracy. Humphrey kept speaking at different convention debates and speeches despite deranged marxists who did not want others to hear the truth spoken by Humphrey. It was most likely Nixon who wanted to prevent Humphrey from speaking truth being that Humphrey was authentic, real, and genuine.

Now we know where the marxists of 2010 learned about throwing temper tantrums and shouting non-sense from. In the 2010s, there was much incivility including marxists yelling at non-hostile people and not being able to have dominion over their anger issues. Humphrey was able to persevere despite non-sensical revilings that applied more to the marxists than to Humphrey.

Johnson Tried to Discourage Humphrey From Being the Democratic Nominee

When Johnson learned that Humphrey was the Democratic Nominee, Johnson actually took to discourage Humphrey. Instead of supporting his candidacy, he took to demotivate and scold him whenever he took anti-war stances on Vietnam. In one instance, Johnson did not receive Humphrey for a meeting choosing to not allow Humphrey in the meeting. In other instances, he was discouraged from making anti-war statements concerning Vietnam. Humphrey also was not informed about Vietnam developments and learned about them in the debates or conventions with the other candidates. Despite the negative treatment, Humphrey kept fighting for Democracy. 

Despite going against the establishment, Nixon, the media, and deranged marxists that shouted at his speeches, Johnson decided to also discourage him. (This describes that Johnson was probably told to not seek re-election and to also discourage Humphrey probably by Hoover). Despite the envy and discouragements, Humphrey kept fighting back against the establishment and Nixon. Humphrey did not resort to underhanded tactics like third parties and having true Democrats shout at Nixon's speeches. (Nixon's town hall meetings where people asked questions from the audience was also not authentic. He had also prepared responses to foreknown questions.) Humphrey was amazing and did not falter fighting racism, envy, and discouragements. Humphrey is a hero.

Jane Loevinger

 Jane Loevinger

"Loevinger's theory combines ego psychology with moral development, and in that sense is not a 'typical' psychodynamically based theory." -Adult Development and Aging by Susan Krauss Whitborne (page 194)

Loevinger was a psychologist who theorized that individuals have a sense of morality that causes them to improve in 1976. Loevinger created a theory that described that individuals are meant to develop responsibility, autonomy, self-discipline, and individuality. Individuals have the autonomy to choose to be independant and individualistic. We learn that Loevinger described six stages of development where individuals can choose to be independent and individualistic or not. Individuals who choose to learn from experiences, develop empathy, and are responsible tend to value individuality.

The first stage or Conformist stage describes individuals who conform to the standards of a group in order to avoid disapproval. These individuals stereotype others and also are mostly concerned about appearances and reputation. Individuals can mature and are able to be self-aware and gain an understanding of morality. The individual matures and develops responsibility that allows him to improve to stages that describe understanding the importance of ethics and morality or the Conscientious-Conformist level and Conscientious stage. The individualistic stage describes that individuals are able to develop empathy and morality.

Individuals are described being autonomous and also wanting to understand the importance of responsibility and morality. Individuals who decide to practice responsibility and empathy are able to improve. Jane Loevinger's theory describes how individuals learn from life experience and are able to regulate emotions, practice empathy, have self-discipline, and understand the importance of morality in life.

Jane Loevinger described that for an individual, the highest level of development consisted in attaining individuality and responsibility. Individuals are able to mature throughout life and choose to be independent, individualistic, and responsible. This theory of development by Loevinger emphasis that individuals are meant to improve throughout life attaining an understanding of ethics, self-discipline, responsibility, and individuality. We can learn to be righteous and responsible and improve each day. Psychologist have described the importance of individualism and responsibility in our day to day lives so that we express our true self and abilities. This prevents conformism that wants individuals to hate and envy others because of their uniqueness and differences.

Jane Loevinger's Stages of Development

Conformist stage- obeys rules to be accepted by the group and to avoid disapproval. Simple view of emotions. Prone to stereotyping others. Concerned about appearances and reputation. (Sycophant mindset. Cares more about outer appearances i.e. racism, classism, sexism, bigotry, heightism, and money).

Conscientious-Conformist Level- The most frequently observed level among adults. Transition between conformist and conscientious stages. Increase in self-awareness of an inner life. Able to see alternatives and exceptions to rules. (Improvement over sycophant mindset yet may still revert back to valuing appearances and reputation.)

Conscientious stage- Major elements of adult conscience, including long term personal goals and ideals, sense of responsibility, and internalization of rules. May practice civil disobedience if unjust rules go against personal standards. Complex inner life and ability to understand emotions of self and others. (Improvement over Conscientious Conformist level and greater sense of responsibility and idealism. Goes against archaic and wicked rules by practicing civil disobedience).

Individualistic level- Greater sense of individuality and ability to be emotionally dependent on others. Ability to tolerate uncertainty and contradiction. (Further improvement with more sense of individuality and empathy. Not necessarrily being completely dependant on the emotions of others but practicing genuine empathy and caring about others.)

Autonomous stage- Ability to think about and cope with inner conflict, such as conflict between personal needs and duties to others. Sees reality as complex and multidimensional. Recognizes the needs of others for autonomy but cherishes personal ties. Holds to broad, abstract, social ideas. (Is able to reconcile differences and not want violence and hate. Can see how there is resolution to conflict through empathy, dialogue, goodness, and honesty. Values independence yet cares for others.)

Integrated Stage- Rarely found in adults. Similar to autonomous stage but in addition has a strong sense of identity and ability to achieve complete expression of the true, inner self. (True independence and respects rights of oneself and others. Values serenity and peace. Sees the importance of individuality and authenticity. Sees each individual as unique and distinct and there is no need for false "comparisons").

The Doctors and Scientists That Told Individuals to Not Take the covid "vaccines"

 The Doctors and Scientists That Told Individuals to Not Take the covid "vaccines"

In the year 2020, there were doctors and scientists who decided to tell individuals to not take the covid "vaccine". The doctors and scientists were from different nations including from China, Uruguay, Italy, Japan, and the United States. The doctors and scientists described that the covid "vaccine" was fairly recent (being approved in 9 months) and needed additional time to study the effects of the vaccine.

Scientists and doctors from different nations described that it would be better to not take the vaccine because it had not been studied rigourously for multiple years. This was in 2020 when the vaccine was being touted as the only manner to prevent death from covid, cure covid, and prevent additional cases. The scientists and doctors described that the arguments were flawed and that the covid vaccine needed additional time to be deemed effective and safe. 

Brave scientists and doctors in 2020 decided to speak truth than to tell individuals to vaccinate with an experimental vaccine. They were probably not liked by the socialists and yet spoke truth. The righteous physicians and scientists decided to tell the truth than to harm their patients. This was while the media was saying day and night that the covid vaccine was the only manner to end the covid pandemic. (The media never stated that individuals can boost their immune system with proper nutrition and exercise. Nor that a covid viral infection can lead to immunity.) Then there is the question of how can there be multiple variants of covid instead of the eradication of the supposed "virus" after vaccinations? Nations that vaccinated have variants, and nations that did not vaccinate do not have variants.

I spoke out in 2021 when the vaccines were noted to cause blood clots. In a specific nation (may have been Denmark), warning labels were placed to indicate that the covid vaccines may cause blood clots. This was when children of 5-11 years of age were the next group that was touted as needing vaccinations by pseudo-science socialists. Despite the incentives offered once the vaccination rate had decreased, individuals kept denying the vaccine. (Even with the incentive of a free beer, donut, scratch off or lottery ticket, and gift cards in the US). I think that the actual percentage of people vaccinated globally never passed 60% and may be anywhere from 50-60% of people receiving one vaccine. There were false reports online as top searches in 2023 or 2024 that stated that 80% of people globally were vaccinated with at least one vaccine. Seems highly unlikely because at 50% the rates of vaccination decreased significantly. Even with incentives, the media promoting the vaccine for 3 years on the news, and additional covid vaccine commercials, individuals refused vaccinations. In 2022 (2 years after saying that all covid vaccines were the same in 2020), Moderna covid vaccines were noted to contain double the mRNA quantity as vaccines from Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Aztra Zeneca. The double quantity of mRNA may explain the adverse health reactions including strokes, blood clots in the lungs, anaphylactic reaction (severe allergic reactions), fatigue, generalized weakness, shortness of breath, and neurological symptoms. We can be grateful to GOD Almighty for good individuals who cared more about speaking truth than telling lies about an experimental vaccine. We can also keep learning about science and history so that we can avoid pseudo-science and lies. There is no doubt that the covid "vaccines" were invented by socialists. (The 1976 flu vaccines were also prepared in haste to an unknown viral strain and resulted in hundreds or thousands of individuals having side effects including death (the unknown 1976 flu virus caused only one death and few infirmities. Only one third of the US was vaccinated.) Dr. Sabin spoke out and said that the vaccine needed to be stored in case of pandemic and not used until there was the need. The vaccines were recalled in 3 months after physicians spoke out against the vaccine.)

Chinese Scientists Were the First to Speak Out Against the covid "virus"

At the beginning of the covid pandemic and the calls to vaccinate in 2020, Chinese scientists spoke out against taking the vaccine. Despite being in a communist country (not entirely communistic because capitalism has also been added recently), Chinese ethical scientists described that the vaccine was too recent to vaccinate with the vaccine. The ethical Chinese scientists described that it was better not to vaccinate with the covid experimental "vaccines" in 2020 and while living in China. The courageous individuals decided to speak truth than say lies.

We can be grateful to GOD Almighty for amazing scientists and doctors who refused to speak lies for temporary wealth and pleasures. Instead they warned us to have healthy skepticism about an experimental "vaccine". The courageous scientists decided to warn everyone about not taking the covid vaccine. We learn that there are good people in the world who prefer to persevere with morality than deceive their bretheren with lies and falsehoods. The Chinese scientists were the first to speak out followed by an Italian doctor who also created a video on Youtube telling individuals not to vaccinate. Then there were Japanese doctors who also spoke out against the vaccine. Uruguayan Pediatricians also told the truth and said that the vaccine should not be taken. Finally, American Doctors also spoke out against the covid vaccine. There may have been other individuals from other countries who spoke out, but in 2019-2021, I remember reading or watching videos of scientists and doctors from those countries that spoke out against the vaccine. We can persevere with gratitude to GOD Almighty for helping us have healthy skepticism and for great Doctors and Scientists who spoke out in 2019-2021 against the vaccine.

Poland Kicked Out the Medical Establishment that Wanted to Vaccinate With an Experimental "vaccine"

There was the story in the 2020s that individuals in Poland had fought against the covid "vaccines" and denied the experimental "vaccines". Poland was among the least vaccinated nations with less than 30% vaccination rates. Poland had lived through tyranny due to nazi socialism and soviet socialism. Poland understood that socialism is the worst method of governance and was able to deny the "vaccine" created by socialists. Poland was able to improve with Catholicism and denying socialism. Despite going through persecution due to Hitler and Stalin, Poland abounded in the worship of GOD Almighty. Poland also had a magnificent leader in Pope John Paul II. Poland was able to improve significantly and persevere. 

Poland in the 2020s also kicked out the socialist doctors who attempted to vaccinate and promote lies. Individuals did not believe the lies of socialism and did not get vaccinated. Individuals also distrusted the socialist doctors that wanted to vaccinate arbitrarily with new "vaccines" approved in haste in 9 months. Poland described the importance of resisting misinformation, lies, and deceit. (It is most likely that brave Polish doctors also spoke out against the "vaccine" but may have been censored by the media or technological monopoly. Censored in the sense that individuals that spoke out were not top results online on Youtube and search engines. This could also have happened against other doctors from other nations who spoke out.)

Ukraine Had the Lowest Vaccination Rate

Ukraine was the nation that had the lowest vaccination rate in the 2020s with less than 18% of the population vaccinated. Ukraine also resisted the lies and denied the experimental "vaccine". Ukraine had gone through the persecution of Stalin and was able to persevere. Since Ukraine abounded after Stalin and the Soviet Union collapsed, socialists were envious. Ukraine is one of the most industrious nations because of Christianity, and was envied by socialists. Ukraine's population also abounded with Democracy and capitalism after the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s. Ukraine had impressive economical improvement for almost four decades until covid "vaccines" attempted to decrease economic growth. Ukraine is predominantly Christian Orthodox and denied the lies of socialists. Ukrainians also denied the covid "vaccine". 

Because most of the population declined the experimental "vaccine" and were industrious, there was probably unneeded warring. (Socialism hates that individuals can improve seen in how Stalin envied industrious individuals including Solzhenytsin and individuals of other ethnicities. The FBI socialists in the 1960s envied and persecuted Civil Rights Activists who were Christian, egalitarian, and good.) Most likely instead of actual warfare, there is persecution. This describes that racist Russians and racist Ukrainians that are socialists with the CIA are persecuting and causing destruction. Despite the persecution, righteous individuals go to Heaven and do not have to live during the times of adversity. (At least we know the times we are living in. We prefer autonomy, authenticity, and freedom to envy, cowardice, and sycophantry.)

6 Years Later and There is Still No Mention of the Origin of the covid "Virus"

The socialists still have not stated how the covid "virus" originated. There was the story of a supposed bat soup that was eaten in China that supposedly led to the covid "pandemic". From what I know, bats are reservoirs of rabies and not covid. I also doubt that there are Chinese individuals that eat bat soup. If bats were the reservoir of covid, then there would have been more cases prior to 2019. However prior to 2019, bats were only known to cause rabies. This describes that the pandemic is still not explained with logic nor with veracity. The covid "virus" has an illusive origin since it causes respiratory symptoms, yet no animal reservoir has been identified (i.e. Avian and Swine flu). The other cause stated was close contact with individuals that had respiratory symptoms. Yet the "virus" has not been gathered, studied, or sequenced? Even the 1918 virus was able to be gathered, studied, and sequenced successfully and that was in the past century, but not the covid "virus" in 2019?

The socialists stated no social gatherings because it may lead to covid infections, yet there is the question of where the virus originates from? There was a commercial on the TV in 2020 that stated that young individuals should not speak to their elder family members because they can spread covid. The commercial seemed disingenous and propaganda. I still spoke to older family members and even an acquaintance of a family member about not getting vaccinated with the covid "vaccine" since it was created in 9 months and not 8-10 years. I told them not to trust the lies and to not get vaccinated. The older family members did not develop covid infection from a conversation. So the commercial (in a Mexican TV channel) probably did not want youth to learn from grandparents who probably have healthy skepticism, wisdom from experience, and have lived through the Great Depression, First World War, Second World War, Cold War, Civil Rights Movement, Collapse of the Soviet Union, 9/11 and destabilization of the Middle East, Collapse of the Banking System in 2009, Avian Flu, Swine Flu, E. Bola outbreak, and still had motivation, encouragement, healthy skepticism, and a sense of humor. In 2021, I still spoke to my grandparent and her friend that they did not need a covid vaccine and also in 2021 spoke out against the covid "pandemic" and experimental vaccine propaganda.

Removal of the Treatment of covid

It was noted by physicians that the medication that most worked against covid infection was Hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine is effective against malaria infections and was discovered to be effective against the covid virus. There were physicians who said that once Hydroxychloroquine was given to patients with moderate to severe respiratory symptoms, they resolved. Physicians stated that the medication was a good medication against covid. After 2021, the medication was removed. The medication that was helping the most was removed from the US. This is a big discrepancy concerning the covid narrative.

Doctors still decided to treat covid infections with high doses of Vitamin C and oxygen. Individuals who had respiratory symptoms improved significantly with high doses of Vitamin C. We can keep using Vitamin C in order to help boost our immune system. Vitamic C helps create biochemical reactions that boost the immune system and prevents disease. Vitamin C is not only a great supplement but can serve as treatment against cold and flus. We can persevere making sure that we eat nutritional food and exercise almost everyday 30 minutes a day except Shabbath.

Different Side Effects (Symptoms) From covid "vaccines"

Another incongruency about the covid "pandemic" was how covid "vaccines" were causing different symptoms. There were reports that covid experimental "vaccines" may have caused different side effects. The side effects included respiratory symptoms like shortness of breath, cough, and wheezing. However the vaccine also caused pulmonary embolism or blood clots in the lungs and brains of certain individuals. Some individuals developed lethal anaphylactic reactions (a young med student vaccinated once and did not survive). Other individuals may have developed Guillen Barre syndrome that leads to arm and leg weakness and neurological symptoms. Others developed fatigue and generalized weakness.

Instead of being recalled once side effects were noted in 2021, the vaccines were promoted in the media everyday for 3-4 years and with additional commercials. Then they wanted to vaccinate 6 month olds twice. The covid "vaccine" propaganda in 2020 may have been very similar to the 1976 experimental "vaccine" mass vaccination campaign to a flu strain of unknown origin except that the 1976 experimental vaccine was recalled in three months after reports of side effects. A large number of people denied the vaccine and only a third of the US population got vaccinated or 40 million of 120 million adults in 1976. So maybe only 50-60% of the global population is vaccinated once with a covid experimental "vaccine" after 6 years.

The Origin of covid variants

There are questions as to how the variants began? We know that the most vaccinated nations have variants while the least vaccinated nations do not have covid infections nor variants. It could be that the covid "vaccine" is the source of the variants. This is because nations and states that vaccinated a large portion of their population had variants. Nations and states that did not vaccinate and refused the covid "vaccines" did not have variants. There were variants in different nations that were vaccinated including reports of variants in China, India, France, and Democrat states and districts in the US during the 2020s (although there were skeptical individuals who did not vaccinate from those nations and states). Meanwhile no infections nor variants were reported in the least vaccinated nations. The statistics also seemed inflated and cooked. 6 nations were described being >99% vaccinated when even the Polio vaccine did not reach more than 70% vaccination in the 1950s. (This was when people who did not vaccinate with the polio vaccine had the risk of getting poliomyelitis and the weakening and paralysis of lower limbs.) It was stated that 9 billion vaccines were administered the first year, yet only 28-32% of the population was vaccinated once during the first year. That would be 2-3 billion vaccines administered and not 9 billion (No one vacccinated 4 times in the first year.) In the following years (2022-2023), the number of people vaccinated once may have actually been 50-60% at most and that was with incentives. The statistic of 80% of the global population being vaccinated once seems false. It was during 2022 and 2023 that the variants began to emerge.

The variants began after the administration of the covid experimental "vaccines" and not before. There was no mention of variants before the "vaccines" in 2019 or before that time. This is while no source has been identified as the cause of covid. It may be that covid is not an organic or normal virus found in nature or an animal reservoir (swine or avian flu) and instead was used to cause fear and get people vaccinated with an experimental "vaccine" that causes variants. The variants may cause respiratory symptoms along with weakness and fatigue. We can have gratitude for not being vacinated once with an experimental "vaccine" that causes variants and even symptoms.

Denied the Job of covid surveillance monitor

After medical school not working out, I went back to work part time jobs including Patient Satisfaction Surveyor conducting interviews with patients to know how they felt about their appointments. I also was working another part time job concurrently that was English and Spanish Interpreter (while writing in my blogs). At the Interpreter job I was being gangstalked by socialists from the past and left that job. I kept applying for other jobs during the covid pandemic in 2021 including covid surveillance monitor. (I was surprised that despite applying to 100s of jobs, I was not receiving interviews. At that time I began to reason that we are not living in the best of times.)

I received the chance to interview for covid surveillance monitor but denied the interview for the job. The covid surveillance monitor position seemed to attempt to help prevent the spread of covid while in retrospect it was probably additional stalking from the system against people who probably were given covid. I was probably given covid in 2018 while in med school. I had a cold that was worse than usual while taking exams, yet passed my exam for the Immunology block. I can not confirm that it was covid but the cold symptoms were worse than a common cold. Either manner I received immunity from the covid virus and did not need to take 4 experimental "vaccines" (especially after learning about immnology in med school). Hallellu JAH! I think that the covid surveillance monitor position actually wanted to stalk people who were given covid and survived. When people got other communicable diseases, there were no Swine flu, Malaria, or West Nile Virus  surveillance specialist position in 2009 or 2021. I think the socialists wanted to keep stalking people who survived covid infections with "calls of concern". I think most people had healthy skepticism and did not answer the phone calls or doubted the intention of the socialists. (That "job" position was created by socialists.) After some months in 2021, that job position was no longer on job posting sites meaning that people did not answer or that it was a temporary position. I am grateful to GOD Almighty allowing me to have healthy skepticism about covid propaganda and not having to stalk through the covid surveilance monitor position and much less promote the "vaccine".

Figures of History and Individualism is meant to remind us that there are good people despite the lies of the snake. While the snake says that "everyone sins and is evil," the reality is that there have been and there are individuals who are good, positive, practice integrity, and hate evil. We can persevere practicing civil disobedience, pacifism, and worshiping GOD Almighty above everything of this temporary and imperfect world. We can persist acknowledging that GOD Almighty is everything to us and deny the lies of the snake.