Paul Screvane

 Paul Screvane

Paul Screvane was a New York City Council President in 1964 who exposed the corruption of community action programs. It was noted by school principals that an agency called Mobilization was not trying to help the poor and instead was fomenting quarreling and class warfare. Mobilization was not instructing self-learning through civics and empathy and instead was instructing marxism and hostilities. Mobilization activists intimidated Welfare office workers demanding free stuff being led by marxist socialists.

School principals noted that Mobilization was employing full time paid agitators and organizers from extremist groups. This was in 1964 when the Civil Rights Movement was fighting for equality of opportunity for jobs and education and not for free stuff. The socialists were fomenting class warfare, racial warfare, conflict, and demanding free things such as paychecks and clothing allowances among other things without having to work. The socialists demanded free things without having to work consistent with socialist hippies and beats while persecuting the true Civil Rights Movement. Marxism was not a part of the Civil Rights Movement.

"Though Mobilization for Youth broke off connections with the welfare rights movement at this point, the movement rolled on under its own momentum. During the next two years welfare rights groups in New York routinely occupied welfare offices, damaged furniture, and clashed with police."- (page 263)

"By the end of the decade community organizing ceased entirely to be a component of the agency's program. Mobilization by then was concentrating on vocational education, with stress of changing the poor to suit the job market rather than changing the market to suit the poor. As a bureaucratic agency bearing a distinct resemblance to the type it had once set out to reform, Mobilization appropriately became a favorite target for militant demonstrations on the East Side."- (page 265)

The newspaper, the Daily News, wrote articles describing how the Mobilization action committee was employing "scores of leftists and subversives" to cause social strife in 1964. This was most likely because the Civil Rights Movement was effective. The racist socialists then wanted to cause class and race warfare in the US by employing racist socialists to practice hostilities, chaos, slander, deceit, and preach socialism. (Maybe McCarthy was not wrong?) Paul Screvane also went against socialists and Mobilization. Screvane said that if there were socialists in Mobilization, the city would not renew Mobilization's contract. Scrivane was probably persecuted by slander and opposed by socialists. Screvane was competing for the Mayor position being a Democrat and did not win. Mobilization was able to keep practicing deceit and instigate conflict. Bertram Beck, a socialist leader in Mobilization, then described that it was time to merge with established institutions (this could mean that socialists also had to appease the trust fund establishment to ensure survival. Marxist socialists who rebelled against American ideals of competition and hard work and believed to be independent and autonomous, had to do the bidding of the trust fund idolators. Marxists in Mobilization then became covert socialists since they had been outed, and Mobilization became a bureaucracy.)

There is a difference between the Civil Rights Movement and marxism. The Civil Rights Movement asked for the elimination of a racist caste system to allow for equal opportunity to compete for jobs and education in order for an individual to improve himself. Marxism demands the practice of racism and classism to prevent equal opportunity and thus foment a caste system. The Civil Rights Movement was created to eliminate the caste system while racist socialists wanted to eliminate equal opportunity and the practice of empathy and hard work for slothfulness and a racist caste system. (The difference betwen Christianity and idolatry).

The Upper Middle Class Socialist Leftists Also Protested Universities in 1965

"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus and you've got to make it stop. And you've go to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all." -Projection from Mario Savio (Individuals are born free and it is actually socialism that is chains and shackles.)

It is described that some of the socialists in 1965 were comprised from the upper middle class who had been raised in opulence and had significant resources. Instead of being grateful for the resources, they decided to believe the lies of socialism and decided to rebel against Christianity, democracy, and capitalism. Since consumerism does not offer satisfaction or a sense of identity, they began to practice socialism. They were the first group of college students to rebel against a quality liberal education, consider themselves "saviors or liberators", and wanted to be instructed lies. African-Americans and minorities were opposed and obstructed from going to college in the 1960s seen in the James Merdith story and were grateful when they were able to obtain a great liberal education. Socialists actually rebelled and protested the ability to receive a quality education considering it "oppressive" because it required hard work and dedication. 

Individuals including Herbert Marcuse, Carl Oglesby, Paul Potter, and Mario Savio, and other protesters described that they needed to fight the "machine" by essentially throwing temper tantrums, lying, and protesting the freedom to receive an education and have autonomy. The socialist students were instructed by socialist propaganda agents (Oglesby, Savio, Marcuse, Potter) to blame liberalism, conservatism, and professors. Socialists were rebeling against having a work ethic, discipline, celibacy, and dedication. They described that the "system" was made up of "liberals" who started the Vietnam war when in fact it was the socialists who created the Vietnam war (Kissinger, Hoover, and Nixon most likely were in charge of escalating the Vietnam war) and kept it going for 5 years until 1970 when Nixon was president. (Coincidence that the war ended once Nixon was president.) The socialist protestors who were college students in university in 1965 created SDS which was to promote socialism in college campuses and rebellion against conservative values, having a work ethic, classical liberalism, and empathy. SDS began to have newspapers, radio programs, and propaganda to lead students to socialism. Despite the student organization, most students did not participate and kept to their integrity and values seeing how socialists were slothful, liars, envious, and conflict causing. (Another reason why Carter and Reagen were elected in the 1970s and 1980s.) The socialist imperialists were actually pro-war and pro-segregation, and the socialist students "appeared" to be the solution to imperialism when the imperialists were socialists. The communist student's solution to socialism's aggression and unneeded warfare was socialism. Essentially socialism is the problem. True patriotic Americans saw straight through the deceit and preferred humble leaders like Reagen and Carter and avoided conflict and envy.