Christopher Hitchens

 Christopher Hitchens

Christopher Hitchens was an atheist that fought against the lies of post-modernism and socialism. During the mid-2010s, Christopher Hitchens described the incongruencies and discrepancies that existed between the lies of post-modernism and the truth of true liberalism. We learn that in the mid-2010s, the marxist feminists and socialists began to be more envious and resentful attempting to cause individuals to use supposed preferred pronouns and cater to their perceived offenses and sensibilities.

Christopher Hitchens was an atheist that argued with socialists and marxist-feminists about the lack of congruency from said false doctrines. While Christopher Hitchens was an atheist, he was able to fight against hypocritical arguments and lies. Christopher Hitchens argued about how individuals have autonomy to not use preferred pronouns and how individuals can not be compelled to use preferred pronouns.

Christopher Hitchens also fought against the restrictive and offended socialist-left that did not want individuals to learn about truth based on being offended for everything. We learn that Christopher Hitchens described how being offended from the socialists was a strategy to prevent the speaking of truth. Hitchens would argue succinctly and convincingly against radical feminists and socialists who believed in double standards and attempted to defend socialism.

Hitchens was important in helping us see that we do not have to believe the temporary lies of socialism nor use preferred pronouns that attempt to restrict freedom of speech. In the mid-2010s in universities, socialism attempted to restrict freedom of speech through the use of preferred pronouns and also catering to the offenses of offended socialists. We learn that there were individuals that valued freedom and autonomy who spoke out against socialism and marxist-feminism. I do not know if Christopher Hitchens converted to Christianity, yet he did fight against socialism and communism describing the incongruencies of double standards and restrictions of freedom of speech.

Hitchens Was an Atheist Yet Fought Against the Socialist Sycophants

While Christopher Hitchens was not a Christian and was actually an atheist, Hitchens fought against the hypocrisy and sycophantry of socialists. In America, there have been different political parties describing that freedom of speech is not only allowed but also celebrated. This is because freedom of speech allows us to see different points of views and perspectives and choose the better choice. Instead of only having one political party seen in Soviet Russia in the 1920s, America had multiple political parties at the same time. Some political parties even faded into oblivion seen in the pro-slavery democrats of 1865 (although there are still racists in the US) who lost the election to Abraham Lincoln who was an anti-slavery Democratic-Republican. Having multiple political parties allowed us to see that there can be differing points of view and yet individuals can live in peace and serenity with one another. This is a clear distinction between improving Democratic Republics and socialist stagnated countries. 

Socialists in the 2010s began to say that individuals should be restricted from speaking truth on account that the truth can be offensive to some people (socialists find the truth offensive because they speak lies, do not like competition, and envy that multiple view points can exist in Democratic Republics while people live in harmony.) Socialists hate individuality and the freedom to think and actually cherish oppression and speaking lies (seen in the opposition to the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.) Socialists began censoring people in the 2010s because they did not want free thinking individuals speaking the truth. While Hitchens was not perfect, he was not a sycophant. Hitchens spoke out against socialists who tried to restrict his freedom of speech rights because he was authentic and unique. Hitchens criticized snobbery based on IQ, criticized socialism, and hated conformism seen in sycophantry. The socialists in the 2010s did not want comedians speaking truth in stand up, intellectuals arguing for liberty and autonomy, and clergy members speaking well of Christianity. Hitchens also criticized marxist-feminist hypocrisy describing that LGBT feminists and homosexuals were trying to appear to be offended to restrict freedom of speech that obviously was not pro-socialism nor pro-communism. Instead of ignoring comedians, intellectuals, and Christians, they actually wanted to prevent comedy, logic, and autonomy from being spoken about describing the hypocrisy of socialists. This is while they did not want anyone restricting their freedom of speech. Hitchens saw straight through the charade in the 2010s and spoke out against socialist sycophantry and hypocrisy. His arguments against socialism and communism are intense and most if not all socialists were not able to argue back with logic and obviously attacked Hitchens with ad hominem attacks (revilings) and by feeling offended. Hitchens helped individuals know that socialism and communism are not good and should be avoided. We should avoid sycophantic socialists who actually hate autonomy and that individuals can live in peace having different points of view. Socialists actually hate freedom and diversity in all its forms including the freedom to think differently, the freedom to learn different perspectives, and the freedom to be unique.

Figures of History and Individualism is written to motivate and instruct the importance of fighting against sin, idol worship, self-worship, and the temporary lies that have increased over the years. We learn that despite not living in the best of times, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against the temporary lies of evil and did not become indoctrinated to false doctrines of hate and lust. When the snake tries to discourage, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against indoctrination, hate, and envy seen in socialism and communism.