Malcolm Mugridge

 Malcolm Mugridge

Malcolm Mugridge is a journalist who wrote in the 1980s about the importance of worshiping GOD Almighty. Mugridge became a Christian and began to write an autobiography and also contributing for some publications. Malcolm Mugridge described how idolatry is the source of difficulties, strife, bitterness, and conflict. Mugridge similar to C.S. Lewis has amazing sayings about how idol worship is the source of difficulties.

Mugridge described how despite the temptation to go for the illusion of power in fame, wealth, and other things that can be idolatry, the worship of GOD Almighty should be most important. This is because the temptations attempt to lead far from GOD Almighty and from the significance and purpose that we have in the worship of GOD Almighty.

Mugridge described that living in serenity with others only happens when there is the worship of GOD Almighty. We can not expect for serenity and harmony to occur from idolatrous and corrupt institutions that practice idol worship and sin. Instead, we can persevere speaking truth and not practicing idol worship and sin. Mugridge described succinctly that individuals should be active by trusting in GOD Almighty and not in idol worship.

We learn that GOD Almighty’s purpose and significance is greater for an individual than the temporary lies that the world tries to offer. We learn that we can not trust temporary lies that want individuals to be far from GOD Almighty and the favor and blessings that exist in the worship of GOD Almighty. 

Andrew Breitbart

 Andrew Breitbart

“Fearless Journalism”

Andrew Breitbart was a journalist who created the Breitbart news blog. Breitbart initially started in the late 2000s or early 2010s describing the lies and deceit of the socialists and communists. Initially, the site described the incongruencies and discrepencies of socialism and communism. We learn that Breitbart included criticisms against leftist communists including writing about Venezuela, Cuba, and socialist countries. Breitbart described truth in his journalism that was not covered by other sources.

Breitbart was probably envied and went through difficulties for speaking truth in the early 2010s. Breitbart died at an early age, in his early fortys, after going for a jog from a heart attack. Breitbart was probably being intimidated for speaking and writing truth in the early 2010s. Breitbart covered not only the hypocrisy and double standards of socialism, but also exposed the drug trafficking that was happening along the border. Breitbart described the importance of speaking and writing truth in journalism.

Initially, Breitbart was a site that described the need to have healthy skepticism about socialism and communism. Breitbart has changed over the years (not for the better). Despite this, Andrew Breitbart is remembered for his courage in journalism. We learn that in the 2006-2012 time period, there were difficulties in Mexico due to drug use and drug trafficking. Breitbart covered this and allowed individuals to see that drug use does not help anyone.

Breitbart covered the manner that drug trafficking occured in the border and why illegal human smuggling was also a danger (This is with the understanding that there were news stories where individuals were left in cargo vehicles in hot weather without basic necessities while being transported by coyotes. Human smuggling is also used by drug traffickers.) This allowed us to know that if there is was no drug use in the United States, then there would be no need of drugs. If there is no demand, then there would be no need of drugs. This would prevent violence and overdoses from happening. We learn that drugs cause harm and are not recreational as post-modernism has attempted to make it seem. We can persevere without using illicit substances and persevere with motivation and gladness appreciating truth and ethical journalism. 

The Cake Baker Who Refused to Bake a Cake for the Homosexuals

 The Cake Baker Who Refused to Bake a Cake for the Homosexuals

In the 2010s, we heard about stories that were not very positive. We learned about the socialists who wanted to make people use preferred pronouns in colleges and universities and who wanted individuals to cater to their sensibilities and being offended. We learned about the male model who was denied work being a model for not wanting to be gay. We learned about a story of the socialists attempting to take a twelve year old child from their parents so that they could transition to the opposite gender (can not recall if it was a male that wanted to be female or female that wanted to be male. I do not remember.) We also learned about the Christian cake baker who denied making a cake for the homosexuals and was slandered and envied for no reason.

The cake baker described how he was a Christian and was not going to make a cake that celebrated homosexuality being a Christian. The baker described that he could not write what the gay couple wanted on the cake being that a marriage is between a man and a woman. The gay couple decided to fight against the cake baker instead of going to another bakery. We learn that there are thousands if not tens of thousands of bakeries in the United States. Why did the gay couple have to go to the cake shop that was Christian? Obviously this was because evil hates harmony and envies talented individuals.

The gay couple decided to go to the court system and fight for “supposed” gay rights when in fact this was about respecting an individuals freedom of religion to not advocate for homosexuality. We learn that the cake baker was right and had the right to refuse service to the gay couple. (I believe that the baker was not against making the cake, but against writing a congratulatory message for homosexuality). I think that the baker stated that they could buy a cake but he was not going to write congratulations and the names of the gay couple. To this the gay couple involved the court system. The baker has a right to not make the cake and/or not write a pro-gay message. The Supreme Court favored the cake baker and described that he did not have to bake the cake.

We learn that the 2010s have not been the best of times due to the envy of the socialists, communists, and homosexuals. We learn that we can persevere speaking truth and having courage despite the envy of the snake. We learn that the cake baker did not compromise his values and chose to honor GOD Almighty above everything. This describes that there are righteous individuals that have decided to persevere with their faith instead of giving in to temporary lies and intimidation. We learn that the cake baker gave us encouragement to know that we can stand for our convictions and values instead of compromising our ethics. 

Figures of History and Individualism is written to motivate and instruct the importance of fighting against sin, idol worship, self-worship, and the temporary lies that have increased over the years. We learn that despite not living in the best of times, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against the temporary lies of evil and did not become indoctrinated to false doctrines of hate and lust. When the snake tries to discourage, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against indoctrination, hate, and envy seen in socialism and communism.

The Male Model Who Denied Modeling

 The Male Model Who Denied Modeling

There was a testimonial from an individual who was a male model that worked for the modeling business. The male model decided to work making commercials and advertisements for modeling brands. The male model described in his testimonial that he was tempted to practice sin and refused to work for the modeling business since he wanted to work based on having a work ethic and not based on favoritism.

The male model would go on to state that he was getting offered work as a male model. He was improving and working hard in the industry. This was in the 2010s that I saw the testimonial of the male model. The male model stated that while improving and getting offered work by modeling agencies, he received the invitation to work for a specific brand. I do not recall the name of the male model, brand name, nor the specific year of the testimonial.

The male model described how he was offered additional work opportunities with a specific brand, yet he was required to eat with a designer at the designer's apartment. The male model described how he was offered work yet had to be in a relationship with the designer at the specific company. The male model declined the work opportunity describing how he was not gay and was not going to compromise his values.

The male model described with disillusionment how he wanted to be a part of the modeling industry, yet did not know that there was the need to compromise values needing to be in a gay relationship to obtain modeling work. The male model in the 2010s described how he refused to accept the relationship and job offer. He described how he then did not receive work offers from other brands and modeling agencies describing that there is corruption even in the modeling industry. Because he refused to be in a gay relationship, he was ostracized from the modeling industry. The male model described how he looked to work being a model but was blacklisted due to envy. This happened in the 2010s and describes how the socialists and communists have attempted to prevent hard working individuals from being industrious. The individual stated truth and helped understand that there are righteous individuals who prefer to be righteous than practice iniquity and sin. 

Figures of History and Individualism is written to motivate and instruct the importance of fighting against sin, idol worship, self-worship, and the temporary lies that have increased over the years. We learn that despite not living in the best of times, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against the temporary lies of evil and did not become indoctrinated to false doctrines of hate and lust. When the snake tries to discourage, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against indoctrination, hate, and envy seen in socialism and communism.

Dr. Jordan Petersen

 Dr. Jordan Petersen

Dr. Jordan Petersen is a clinical psychologist and professor who described the incongruencies and double standards of the radical socialist left in Canada. Dr. Jordan Pertersen described in the 2010s about the need to guard oneself from the false philosophies of socialism and communism that attempted to indoctrinate towards intolerance and envy. We learn that the socialists in the 2010s attempted to prevent truth from being spoken by being offended about everything and also attempting to get individuals to use non-sensical preferred pronouns.

Dr. Jordan Petersen stated that individuals did not have to use preferred pronouns because there is freedom of speech. We learn that there are videos of Dr. Jordan Petersen arguing about the need to respect freedom of speech and that individuals are not compelled to use preferred pronouns. Dr. Jordan Petersen described how socialist students attempted to get professors to use preferred pronouns being that there is no time for that in class. We learned that professors should not have to memorize or use preferred pronouns being that there is the need to teach instead.

Dr. Jordan Petersen described how individuals have freedom of speech to not use preferred pronouns and how individuals can not be compelled to use preferred pronouns. We learn that Dr. Petersen also instructed the need to practice responsibility and fight against irresponsibility and immaturity. We learn that individuals learned about the importance of responsibility and being far apart from false philosophies described in nihilism, atheism, socialism, and communism. We learned that with Cristopher Hitchens and other individuals that described the importance of free speech and autonomy, socialism and communism were exposed as the farce that they really are in the 2010s.

Responsible individuals were able to learn from Dr. Petersen and Christopher Hitchens about the need to guard freedom of speech and fight against the temporary lies of socialism. We also learned about the need to be responsible and not believe the lies of socialism that tempt into irresponsibility, immaturity, envy, and intolerance. We have seen negative examples of individuals who “argued” against Dr. Petersen and Christopher Hitchens who defended double standards and the use of preferred pronouns being intolerant and attempting to either slander with ad hominem insults (calling them “racist”, “bigots”, “fascists”, and “nazis” while we know that the socialists and communists project their deficits and are actually racists, bigots, fascists, and illogical like the nazi socialists) or prevent the truth from being spoken. We have learned that the socialists and communists attempt to place uneven obstacles to prevent the truth from being spoken. We learn that even amidst the opposition, there were bold individuals that fought against the socialists and communists allowing us to see the truth and remove lies from our lives. 

Figures of History and Individualism is written to motivate and instruct the importance of fighting against sin, idol worship, self-worship, and the temporary lies that have increased over the years. We learn that despite not living in the best of times, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against the temporary lies of evil and did not become indoctrinated to false doctrines of hate and lust. When the snake tries to discourage, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against indoctrination, hate, and envy seen in socialism and communism.

Christopher Hitchens

 Christopher Hitchens

Christopher Hitchens was an atheist that fought against the lies of post-modernism and socialism. During the mid-2010s, Christopher Hitchens described the incongruencies and discrepancies that existed between the lies of post-modernism and the truth of true liberalism. We learn that in the mid-2010s, the marxist feminists and socialists began to be more envious and resentful attempting to cause individuals to use supposed preferred pronouns and cater to their perceived offenses and sensibilities.

Christopher Hitchens was an atheist that argued with socialists and marxist-feminists about the lack of congruency from said false doctrines. While Christopher Hitchens was an atheist, he was able to fight against hypocritical arguments and lies. Christopher Hitchens argued about how individuals have autonomy to not use preferred pronouns and how individuals can not be compelled to use preferred pronouns.

Christopher Hitchens also fought against the restrictive and offended socialist-left that did not want individuals to learn about truth based on being offended for everything. We learn that Christopher Hitchens described how being offended from the socialists was a strategy to prevent the speaking of truth. Hitchens would argue succinctly and convincingly against radical feminists and socialists who believed in double standards and attempted to defend socialism.

Hitchens was important in helping us see that we do not have to believe the temporary lies of socialism nor use preferred pronouns that attempt to restrict freedom of speech. In the mid-2010s in universities, socialism attempted to restrict freedom of speech through the use of preferred pronouns and also catering to the offenses of offended socialists. We learn that there were individuals that valued freedom and autonomy who spoke out against socialism and marxist-feminism. I do not know if Christopher Hitchens converted to Christianity, yet he did fight against socialism and communism describing the incongruencies of double standards and restrictions of freedom of speech.

Figures of History and Individualism is written to motivate and instruct the importance of fighting against sin, idol worship, self-worship, and the temporary lies that have increased over the years. We learn that despite not living in the best of times, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against the temporary lies of evil and did not become indoctrinated to false doctrines of hate and lust. When the snake tries to discourage, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against indoctrination, hate, and envy seen in socialism and communism.

The Polish Cardiologist Who Fought Against The Socialist Nazis

 The Polish Cardiologist Who Fought Against The Socialist Nazis

Viktor E. Frankl described the story of a Polish cardiologist who organized the Warsaw Ghetto Upheaval during the time of the socialist nazi persecution in the 1940s. The Polish cardiologist was able to help fight against the nazi socialists. We learn that the nazi socialists had attempted to persecute Jewish individuals based on race because they were ignorant and racist. Pope John Paul II described that he learned about bravery and courage from the Polish individuals who resisted indoctrination and racism from the nazi socialists.

The Polish cardiologist was able to help organize a resistance against hate and racism. We learn that there were Polish individuals in the 1940s who fought against racism and nazi socialism. While there were individuals that were persecuted for their faith and their race, we learn that there were also Polish individuals that persevered despite persecution. We learn that the 1940s described the importance of fighting against hate and racism seen in nazi socialism. We learn that Poland has given us a great example of resisting temporary lies in nazi socialism and soviet socialism.

We learn that the Polish cardiologist described that having courage is important. The Polish cardiologist stated that to shoot a gun did not require courage, but to persevere with faith amidst adversity is courageous. The Polish cardiologist described that persevering despite persecution was courageous. We learn that there were individuals who were martyred for being Jewish and yet never renounced their faith. This describes that regardless of circumstances, it is possible to persevere with faith and courage.

We learn that Poland was able to persevere and would later also fight against soviet socialism. We learn that the faith in GOD Almighty allows us to persevere despite times, obstacles, or persecution. We learn that while fighting nazi socialism and soviet socialism, Poland is a country that has taught us the importance of courage and zeal. Pope John Paul II described that he was motivated to preach with courage despite the persecution of socialists because of the righteous individuals in the 1940s in Poland that fought against tyranny and did not become indoctrinated to the lies of hate and racism. We learn that nazi socialism lasted 30 years, and the Nuremberg Trials described the obvious repudiation and repulsion of racism by Germans and individuals everywhere. We learned that the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s because of courageous individuals who spoke truth and kept faith in the LORD of all, GOD Almighty. 

Figures of History and Individualism is written to help us persevere knowing that throughout history there were and are individuals that decide to practice goodness, integrity, ethics, and righteousness. While there may be temporary lies told about the need to practice sin and idol worship, we learn that there are individuals that have resisted and keep resisting against temptations and persevere through persecution. We can find encouragement and motivation in individuals that chose to persevere with kindness, genuine empathy, wisdom, and fidelity to GOD Almighty instead of giving in to sin and idolatry. 

V. Golitsyn

 V. Golitsyn

“No, honestly-however many letters you receive, those from zeks stand out unmistakably. Such extraordinary toughness they show! Such clarity of purpose combined with such vigor and determination! In our day, if you get a letter completely free from self-pity, genuinely optimistic- it can only be from a former zek. They are used to the worst the world can do, and nothing can depress them.”- (page 448)

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described how righteous individuals were able to persevere despite the adversities. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described that righteous individuals were able to persist because of their zeal for the worship of GOD Almighty and positivity. Individuals that were faithful were also positive. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described that being optimistic helps persevere amidst obstacles, persecution, and times of difficulty.

Once individuals completed their sentence in gulag and survived, they would be exiled to other nations outside of Soviet Russia. Despite being exiled, individuals were happy because they were able to have freedom and autonomy outside of gulag. Individuals described how they had gratitude despite having gone through gulag and persecution. There were individuals that knew that the adversities and difficulties were because of the envy of socialists and informants.

“The pictures of the past conjured up are by no means all dark and harrowing; we have many warm and pleasant memories.” (page 447)

Golitsyn was another individual that was positive and had gratitude despite having gone through gulag. Golitsyn described that despite having gone through all the negativity of the socialists and informants, righteous individuals still saw the positive out of everything. Even when they had been persecuted and sent to gulag on false accusations, they still had memories of the positive and good. Golitsyn remembered that not everything was negative, and he could still remember positive moments. This describes that individuals can see the positive out of everything instead of having negativity and envy.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described how he became optimistic seeing how righteous Christians persevered through everything with zeal and courage. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described how righteous individuals saw the good and positive out of everything. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described how he received letters from righteous individuals who had been in gulag and described that their letters were positive and free from self-pity. Instead of being resentful and envious, the righteous individuals described the lessons learned and positivity that allowed them to persevere. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described that righteous individuals were surprisingly cheerful and happy. 

Figures of History and Individualism is written to help us persevere knowing that throughout history there were and are individuals that decide to practice goodness, integrity, ethics, and righteousness. While there may be temporary lies told about the need to practice sin and idol worship, we learn that there are individuals that have resisted and keep resisting against temptations and persevere through persecution. We can find encouragement and motivation in individuals that chose to persevere with kindness, genuine empathy, wisdom, and fidelity to GOD Almighty instead of giving in to sin and idolatry. 

Stanley Dale

 Stanley Dale

Stanley Dale was a preacher and missionary that preached Christianity in Papua New Guinea. Stanley Dale was able to preach King Jesus Christ in the islands of New Guinea, and Christianity increased to the islands. We learn that there have been individuals that have preached Christianity throughout the world regardless of persecution or opposition and were able to accomplish their purpose of preaching King Jesus Christ to the nations.

Stanley Dale was able to preach in the islands of Papua New Guinea where few individuals had preached. We learn that there are Christian churches in the Pacific Islands due to the preaching of missionaries and apostles. Papua New Guinea had individuals practicing idol worship, and Stanley Dale was able to preach King Jesus Christ. Stanley Dale was persecuted and martyred, yet Christianity increased in the Pacific Islands.

We learn that Christianity has increased over the past two thousand years not only in the nations but also in the islands. Stanley Dale along with other missionaries were able to preach and cause Christianity to reach places that were remote and far from civilization. We learn that King Jesus Christ spoke truth about Christianity being preached to Israel and the nations. We learn that Christianity has increased to many nations and keeps being preached.

We can persevere with fidelity to GOD Almighty knowing that in the worship of GOD Almighty, we have everything that we need. We learn that nothing in this world compares with the glory of Shabbath Millennium and New Jerusalem. We learn that while there may be envy, persecution, or opposition, we choose the Eternal GOD of gods, GOD Almighty.

Figures of History and Individualism is written to help us persevere knowing that throughout history there were and are individuals that decide to practice goodness, integrity, ethics, and righteousness. While there may be temporary lies told about the need to practice sin and idol worship, we learn that there are individuals that have resisted and keep resisting against temptations and persevere through persecution. We can find encouragement and motivation in individuals that chose to persevere with kindness, genuine empathy, wisdom, and fidelity to GOD Almighty instead of giving in to sin and idolatry. 

Stanislaus Kostka

 Stanislaus Kostka

“We are born for greater things.”

Pope John Paul II described the importance of persevering despite adversity. We learn from the Sacred Scriptures that sometimes there is adversity or difficulties for being righteous, yet we are able to persevere in the worship of GOD Almighty. Pope John Paul II described the importance of righteous individuals that were able to persevere despite adversity or persecution. We learn that we are created to worship GOD Almighty above everything.

When we have eternal meaning and purpose in the worship of GOD Almighty, we are able to persevere despite opposition, envy, or persecution. We learn that Pope John Paul II was persecuted for speaking truth and being faithful. We learn that Pope John Paul II was able to persevere despite the envy of the socialists and communists. Pope John Paul II described the importance of having meaning and purpose. Stanislaus Kostka was an individual that was righteous and described the importance of having significance, meaning, purpose, and importance in the worship of GOD Almighty.

We learn that we can not practice sin and idol worship because the favor and blessings of GOD Almighty are greater and better than the things of the world. We learn that the snake wants to tempt with temporary lies and say that there are better things than the worship of GOD Almighty. We learn that fame, fortune, and false “relationships” are sometimes used to tempt into the practice of sin and idol worship, yet we have learned that there are righteous individuals that have denied temptations and chose eternal salvation in King Jesus Christ. We learn that we do not need the fame because that leads to self-worship and only GOD Almighty deserves the worship. We learn that Paul denied being worshiped when he preached in Laocenia re-directing the worship to GOD Almighty. Paul preached to the nations and Christianity increased to the nations in the first century.

We learn that we have our basic necessities and the things we need in King Jesus Christ and if we do not have something, then it is because we do not need it. Moses and the righteous of Israel persevered in the desert to obtain the land of Canaan that became the land of Israel. We learn that the love of money can tempt to the practice of idol worship, envy, coveting, and ingratitude. We learn to persevere with fidelity and gratitude instead of coveting and ingratitude. We know that money can stagflate like in Venezuela. We do not need false “relationships” because they either try to lead to idolatry or separate from the worship of GOD Almighty. We know that there are individuals that have given over their life to Christ and persevered to eternal salvation being single similar to Pope John Paul II and Mother Theresa of Calcutta. We learn that when we trust in GOD Almighty, we have everything that we need. We know that there is no substitute for King Jesus Christ. We have eternal meaning and purpose to live in Shabbath Millennium and New Jerusalem. 

Figures of History and Individualism is written to help us persevere knowing that throughout history there were and are individuals that decide to practice goodness, integrity, ethics, and righteousness. While there may be temporary lies told about the need to practice sin and idol worship, we learn that there are individuals that have resisted and keep resisting against temptations and persevere through persecution. We can find encouragement and motivation in individuals that chose to persevere with kindness, genuine empathy, wisdom, and fidelity to GOD Almighty instead of giving in to sin and idolatry. 

Edith Stein

 Edith Stein

Pope John Paul II described individuals who persevered with faith despite the difficulties and adversities. There are individuals that persevered in their zealous faith and obtained eternal salvation. We learn that there were individuals that were persecuted because of their faith in the 1940s who obtained eternal salvation. Pope John Paul II described how despite adversity, individuals were able to persevere without doubting their faith. Maximillian Kolbe and Edith Stein were two individuals that were martyred because of the envy of the nazi socialists under Hitler, and yet did not renounce their faith. We learn that individuals including Dietrich Bonhoeffer were persecuted yet obtained eternal salvation. We know that Hitler would destroy himself due to his cowardice and did not live to old age. 

We learn from the Sacred Scriptures that there are individuals that obtained their eternal salvation and lived to long life while there were also individuals that were persecuted. We learn that regardless, we can persevere with eternal salvation in King Jesus Christ. We know that the most important point is eternal salvation in King Jesus Christ. Despite adversity, there are examples of righteous individuals who did not deny their faith in King Jesus Christ. We learn that in the worship of GOD Almighty, we have everything that we need.

Having zealous faith allows us to persevere and not have negative emotions describing fear, envy, doubts, and discouragements. We can choose to persevere with courage and valor in the worship of GOD Almighty. We learn that Christianity is preached and will keep being preached in the end times. Zeal allows us to know that our self-worth is in the worship of GOD Almighty and not in external temporary things. We learn that while there may be persecution, we can see the positive of everything. If we have to keep preaching, then we have to keep preaching. If there is martyrdom, then individuals get eternal salvation and are reunited with GOD Almighty. This wisdom prevents us from being discouraged knowing that we are created to live in Shabbath Millennium and New Jerusalem for all eternity. 

We are able to see the positive of everything knowing that this life is a test to know who do we worship. Do we worship GOD Almighty or not? Do we prefer the Creator and LORD of all or not? We are able to understand that we can not anchor ourselves to the temporary things of this life and instead choose eternal salvation in King Jesus Christ. Maximillian Kolbe and Edith Stein were persecuted yet did not renounce her faith. We learn to choose GOD Almighty above everything. 

Dr. Martin Luther King

 Dr. Martin Luther King 

Interpretacion a otros lenguajes

"Judge not a man by the color of his skin but by the content of his character."

The story of Dr. Martin Luther King describes the importance of fighting the injustices of the world with pacifism and non-violence. We learn that Dr. Martin Luther King was a preacher that was able to fight for equal rights for minorities knowing that there was racism that existed. We learn that in the 1960's there was inequality that existed because of racism, and Dr. Martin Luther King fought against racism. We learn that while other movements attempted to incorporate hate and violence, Dr. Martin Luther King preached the importance of civil disobedience against measures that were racist and designed to prevent individuals from improving themselves.

"Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."

We learn about the examples that existed in the past of Jim Crowe laws that attempted to prevent individuals from improving themselves. There were also unjust discriminatory laws that called for separate bathrooms, separate water fountains, and even different seatings in buses for people that were African-American or minorities. This describes the manner that sometimes there is racism that exists and there is the need to combat the temporary lies and negative emotions that attempt to lead to hate and envy without reason. We learn that while there were movements calling the need to fight hate with hate seen in false philosophies of hate and lust, Dr. Martin Luther King called on the need to preach filial love, genuine empathy, and civil disobedience describing that racism does not allow for true equality.

"Yes, if you want to say that I was a drum major, say that I was a drum major for justice; say I was a drum major for peace; say I was a drum major for righteousness. And all the other shallow things will not matter."

We learn that Dr. Martin Luther King was able to preach and describe the importance of not fighting hate with hate and instead instructed the need to fight against hate by preaching unity, equality, and wisdom. We learn that Dr. Martin Luther King was able to help African-Americans and minorities fight against the injustices of racism that had existed in the past. We learn that because of the preaching and determination of Dr. Martin Luther King, the unjust and unequal Jim Crowe laws were removed and instead the importance of equality, empathy, and filial love was seen. We are able to see the importance of how filial love and genuine empathy can conquer hate when fighting against hate.

We learn that Dr. Martin Luther King's example allows us to know that we can not have negative emotions describing hate, anger, and envy because they attempt to lead to a negative road. We learn that instead we are supposed to persevere preaching truth and learn that there is no need for hate. We learn that the other movements that were non-peaceful describing militant groups were not helpful. Dr. Martin Luther King's example allows us to know that we can persevere preaching truth and not be a part of the inequalities and injustices that false philosophies attempt to lead to. We learn that the elimination of Jim Crowe laws and improvements of equality, equity, and justice for minorities occurred because of Dr. Martin Luther King and individuals that decided to fight against hate with genuine empathy, filial love, and not participating with the injustices of an unequal system.

Martin Luther King Fought For Minorities and Was Slandered by the FBI Being Called a Communist

Martin Luther King fought for the rights of African-Americans and minorities. MLK fought for improved wages of minorities in the 1960s when racism and envy attempted to prevent improved wages for minorities. The FBI slandered MLK calling him a communist being that MLK was a Christian preacher. We learn communism and socialism actually projects its deficits and attempts to oppose Christianity. We learn that the communists are racists and project their deficits unto others. We learn that the FBI started slandering MLK because he was helping individuals who were discriminated based on race. MLK was slandered by the FBI being called a communist and also had the hotelrooms at the locations that he was staying bugged. The FBI wiretapped the hotelrooms at the locations that MLK was staying in different cities. MLK kept fighting despite the opposition from racists in the 1960s.

MLK fought against racism and preached the importance of genuine empathy while fighting against hate. We know that there was slander because MLK was helping individuals fight for improved wages for the working class instead of having decreased wages based on racism. MLK also fought for the civil rights of minorities that was attempted to be prevented by racism. There are history books that described how the FBI did not actually attempt to help the civil rights movement and actually stood aside while citizens fought against racism. There are history books that state that the FBI tried to not help the civil rights movement in the 1960s and that the FBI even opposed MLK calling him a communist and wiretapping his rooms. (There are some good things that the FBI has done in the past, yet there are actually a large number of negative things they have done including slandering MLK and also wiretapping also seen against the Democrats in the 1970s. There is also the story of David Koresh who was attacked by the FBI for "supposedly" owning a hand-gun silencer that most likely could have been planted. I do not know all the details yet the FBI invaded the David Koresh compound due to envy looking for a silencer yet illegally entered the compound trespassing, used explosives, and shot at the people living inside when there were innocent children. David Koresh was married and had children and lived in Waco, TX. The response from the FBI was rather questionable seeing how the silencer was most likely planted and the FBI was envious of David Koresh for living in a manner that was different from the system in the 1990s. These examples help us be far apart from negative people and have healthy skepticism against bureaucracies that have attempted to usurp authority. We can have gratitude being far apart from negative and deceitful people who do not look to help others.)

Dr. Albert Sabin

 Dr. Albert Sabin

Interpretacion en otros lenguajes

Dr. Albert Sabin was a physician and researcher who was able to make a vaccine for the poliomyelities virus in the 1950s. We learn that Dr. Jonas Salk's vaccine that used killed polio virus was approved and used successfully. We learn that Dr. Sabin theorized that inactivated or weakened polio virus would lead to a greater immune reaction that would be more effective against the poliomyelitis virus. We learn that Dr. Sabin was able to create another polio virus vaccine to fight against polio virus infection. 

We learn that both vaccines were effective against fighting the polio virus seeing that the number of cases of polio in the 1950s decreased substantially. We learn that this described the two methods that are usually used by researchers to create vaccines. We learn that there is the killed virus method that prevents individuals from obtaining sickness or illness seen in Dr. Salk's polio vaccine that was highly effective and efficient at reducing polio infection. 

We learn that the other method of producing vaccines is the inactivated virus method that uses weakened virus strains to prevent infection and stimulate an immunological response. We learn that both vaccines were researched over 8-10 years and were tested to make sure there were no side effects or adverse reactions to the individual's health. We learn that science can be used to create great discoveries seen in the poliomyelitis vaccines of the 1950s. We learn that since the use of polio vaccines starting with Dr. Salk's vaccine, polio infections decreased significantly. 

We learn that along with penicillin and certain medications in the last century, there were great improvements in health and well being. We can learn about the vaccines in order to guard ourselves from newer vaccines that have not been researched for 8-10 years and have not been tested compared to previous approved and studied vaccines. We can learn that science can help when used with integrity and ethics, while making sure that we do not place all our attention or importance on science. We know that GOD Almighty is LORD and Creator and that instead we worship GOD Almighty who allows us to distinguish truth from false lies. Instead of making science our everything, we can decide to worship GOD Almighty and learn about science with responsibility and integrity so that we guard ourselves from pseudo-science and unresearched medication and vaccines.

Albert Sabin Described the Need to Be Cautious About Unneeded Vaccinations in the 1970s

"He spoke at the University of Toledo on May 17, recommending that the vaccine be made but held in storehouses unless and until it was clear that a deadly swine flu epidemic was in progress."- (page 156)

Albert Sabin who created a successful new vaccine against the poliomyelitis virus, was able to describe hesitancy towards immunizing all of the United States' population with a new vaccine against a virus that had affected a few soldiers in a specific fort in 1976. The virus was considered to be similar to a deadly strain of flu and almost like the flu of 1918. There was a virus that had affected a fort and killed a soldier and infected a few others, yet scientists took to create a new vaccine of the virus. While not knowing which virus it was, scientists decided to create a vaccine against the virus for fear that it was similar to the "1918 flu virus". Sabin was an individual that cautioned against giving vaccines when the virus was not known and was not causing severe symptoms and had only infected a few people. While initially scientists attempted to speak on the need to vaccinate in a large scale all of the United States population describing the need of more than 120 million vaccines, we learn that Sabin cautioned against the use of such vaccines. Another physician, Dr. Martin Goldfield, stated that, "If Americans have flu shots in the numbers predicted [attempting to vaccinate all of the United States population in the 1970s], as many as 2,300 will have strokes and 7,000 will have heart attacks within two days of being immunized... Within a week after receiving flu shots, 45 people will develop encephalitis and more than 9,000 will get pneumonia."(page 161) Dr. Martin Goldfield, who was the chief epidemiologist of New Jersey described that there should not be a mass campaign to vaccinate the United States because healthy individuals could experience heath issues and side effects, "Healthy people might experience serious side effects from the vaccine... 'There are many dangers to going ahead with immunizing the population as there are with withholding. We can soberly estimate that approximately fifteen percent of the entire population will suffer disability reactions.'"(page 155). In the conclusion of the vaccination program in the 1970's, only 40 million vaccines were applied. 

"Nonetheless, by mid-December, 40 million Americans, a third of the adult population, had had swine flu shots. It was twice as many as before immunized against flu in any single season and it was the largest vaccination program in history."-(page 167)

It was learned that after the vaccines were approved for use, some individuals began to experience vaccine side effects including heart attacks, strokes, and even Guillain-Barré syndrome. Sabin described in the time prior to the vaccines being distributed that there was the need to store the vaccines until there was a true need. Sabin described the need to see if there was a true need for the vaccines instead of vaccinating everyone in the United States. Sabin was able to speak out against the mass vaccination when the specific virus was not known at the time. The reason for vaccinating was because the virus seemed like the "1918 virus" while not actually knowing the specific strains of said virus. In 1977, it was concluded that the mass vaccination of individuals could have caused multiple cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome along with cases of heart attacks and strokes. 

The Flu Virus of 1976 and Mass Vaccination

There was a flu in 1976 that devastated a fort and led to the death of a young soldier. There were four additional cases. Scientists thought that the virus was virulent and could cause significant difficulties. We learn that the scientists decided to create a flu vaccine although the flu strain was not completely known. The flu virus was described similar to a swine flu (although the specific strain was not known). The scientists believed that the flu may be similar to the “1918 flu” that devastated large numbers of people. We learn that in 1976, scientists created a flu vaccine against the virus of 1976. While it was generally agreed that the vaccine was necessary, Albert Sabin was one of the few individuals that expressed the need to hold the vaccine in safe storage until it was known if the virus was potentially virulent and dangerous.

We learn that Albert Sabin voiced his opposition in May 17, 1976, of vaccinating the whole United States population (120 million people) with the 1976 vaccine against the 1976 flu of unknown strain. This was because the virus had only affected a few individuals and was not as virulent compared to the 1918 virus. The option was to store the vaccine in storage until the virus was known to be lethal and virulent. The vaccine was given to 40 million people, and there were more than a few cases of heart attacks, strokes, Guillain Barré syndrome, and other side effects (some reports included multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, polyomyositis…). There were cases of heart problems in individuals who died starting ten days after immunization with the vaccines (page 165). Guillain Barré is a rare disorder that only affects 4,000–5,000 individuals per year, yet 1,100 cases were reported in December 1976 after vaccination with the flu vaccine in October 1st of 1976. (page 167, 168, 174). There is the description that Guillain Barré syndrome can lead to respiratory problems that lead to death in five percent of cases and in ten percent of cases individuals get a type of permanent paralysis. 

The Mass Vaccination of the Flu Vaccine of 1976 Was Discontinued After Reports of Side Effects and Neurological Symptoms

We learned that there were individuals that were speaking out against the mass vaccination with the flu vaccine of 1976. By December of 1976, there were more than a 1,100 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome along with additional cases of neurological symptoms, heart problems, strokes, and side effects. This was all in reaction to a few cases of the flu that appeared to be like the “1918 flu”. We learned that only one soldier died and a few others were infected. The flu of 1976 did not affect the general population like it had affected the soldiers at the fort. The flu strain of 1976 could not be compared to the “flu of 1918” at that time because there was no 1918 flu strain sample to compare to. The intention was to use the 1976 virus to develop a "fast growing flu strain" for vaccinations when it was not known if the virus was virulent or similar to the 1918 flu. (page 137) “On Wednesday, December 15, the Centers notified doctors across the nation that they should continue giving swine flu shots.” (page 172)

An epidemiologist and neurologist, Dr. Lawrence Schonberger, along with Sabin had decided to speak out against the mass vaccination of the United States population after seeing the reports of possible cases of Guillain-Barré and other side effects. “A couple of additional cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome had been reported by then, making the association stronger. On Thursday, December 16, Sencer conceded that the swine flu vaccination program must be stopped because of the possibility that the vaccine might be causing Guillain-Barré syndrome. That day, with President Ford's agreement, Dr. Theodore Cooper, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, announced that the swine flu immunization campaign was over. There had not been a single case of swine flu and the prospect of any danger at all from the vaccine was chilling.” (page 174–175)

Even the Centers described how getting the vaccine was able to cause possible Guillain-Barré syndrome. There were other possible side effects of the 1976 flu vaccine describing “facial paralysis, nerve inflammation, encephalitis injuries to nerves of the hands and feet, brachial nerve inflammation, inflammations of the optic nerve, people whose nerves were losing their insulating layer, called myelin.” (page 174–175). This helps us know that there were actual risks to the flu vaccine of 1976 and the number of severe virulent flu cases were not actually increased to warrant the mass vaccination. This is described because the mass vaccination of the 1976 flu vaccine in the United States was terminated in December 1976 after Sabin had described the need to hold the vaccine on storage until it was deemed needed by a severe epidemic in May of 1976.

“The Centers concluded that the vaccine increased people's risk of getting the disease eightfold, and that the risk period extended for ten weeks after the immunization.The Centers also turned up people with a variety of other neurological disorders that commenced after the flu shots.”- (page 174–175)

The 1976 flu vaccine was given and caused severe reactions in individuals that even the Centers described how there was the indication that vaccinating with the flu vaccine of 1976 could have led to severe neurological side effects. The risk of developing Guillain-Barré syndrome was eight times higher for people vaccinated with the 1976 flu vaccine with the symptoms developing in the first six weeks after immunization. There was also additional side effects from the vaccine that included multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and polyomyositis. There was the understanding that the vaccine should have been discontinued after nine states suspended the administration of the vaccine due to deaths and side effects in October 1976, yet the vaccine was still given until December of 1976 (page 176). 

Having Healthy Skepticism Concerning the Approval of New Medications and Vaccines

With the 1976 flu vaccine, we were able to learn that there is the need to have healthy skepticism concerning how the vaccines are approved. We learn there were vaccines like the polio vaccine that took 8–10 years to study and approve so that the side effects and unneeded symptoms could be researched. We learn that the polio vaccines created by Dr. Salks and Dr. Sabin were actually effective, efficient, and looked to prevent side effects from developing. We learn that the polio virus was essentially decreased with minimal cases after the administering of the two different polio vaccines in the 1950s. We learn that both vaccines, the inactivated and attenuated forms of the vaccines, were able to help the United States combat polio virus cases.

In the 1970s, Dr. Sabin had expressed concerns about mass vaccination of the United States with the 1976 flu vaccine when there were not that many cases of the 1976 flu virus nor multiple virulent cases. Dr. Sabin described the need to store the vaccine in storage until there was evidence that the 1976 virus was virulent and reaching epidemic levels in May of 1976. We learn that once the vaccine was administered and cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome were reported along with side effects that included pneumonia, neurological symptoms, heart problems, strokes, encephalitis, and multiple sclerosis among the side effects of the 1976 vaccine, there were physicians that spoke out against continuing the mass vaccination. We learn that a neurologist spoke about there being a possible correlation between having received the 1976 flu vaccine and cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Eventually, nine states decided to discontinue the administering of the vaccine in October 1976. The Centers decided to say that there was the need to keep administering the vaccine. Until December 1976 was the 1976 vaccine removed from use. The mass distribution of the 1976 vaccine describes the importance of having healthy skepticism when learning about new medications or new vaccines. We need to study the manner that the medications and vaccines are created, manufactured, and approved in order to make sound decisions concerning if we need said vaccine or medication. While the goal was to vaccinate 120 million Americans in 1976, there was only 40 million that were vaccinated, yet mutiple side effects and unneeded symptoms were observed. This is with the manner that insurance companies did not want to insure said 1976 vaccines because of the risk of side effects and symptoms. Insurance companies decided to not want to insure the vaccines being that they did not want to handle the probability of side effects and symptoms that could arise from the administering of the 1976 vaccines. The Federal Government decided to take on that responsibility and described that they would be responsible for the insuring of the 1976 vaccines. This led to cases where individuals that developed side effects and symptoms went to the government for restitution, yet even then, there were cases that were not compensated.

Denying Covid “Vaccines” and Persevering With Healthy Skepticism

This is interesting noting how in the covid “pandemic” of 2019, the pharmaceutical companies stated that they were not held liable for adverse side effects and symptoms. This describes how there is a need to guard ourselves from vaccines that are prepared in haste without 8–10 years of research. We learn that the covid “vaccine” was created in 9 months and was conditionally “approved” based on emergency use due to the “pandemic” when it did not have 8–10 years of careful investigation and research. While the vaccines have been administered over the past years including booster shots, there are questions as to why there are variants of covid instead of the eradication of the covid virus. We can have healthy skepticism to know that we do not need covid “vaccines” that have not described essential basic questions including where the “virus” originated, why the vaccine was the only method of treatment, why there are still variants years later, why individuals had to be vaccinated to go to school and/or work, why the media did not describe the importance of bolstering the immune system with adequate nutrition and exercise, why medication that was helping was removed, why there was more than one vaccine and booster needed to be “complaint”, why gyms were closed and individuals needed to be “vaccinated” to go to a gym, why the pharmaceutical companies did not want to be held responsible for side effects or unneeded symptoms of the “vaccine”, and why 6 month old infants need a dose of the vaccine? 

Either manner, we can persevere knowing that we do not need any of the covid “vaccines” or “boosters”, and we can keep trusting in our immune system that GOD Almighty created in perfect manner, exercising every day minimum thirty minutes a day except for Shabbath, and making sure that we repent of sin and obey the commandments of Moses. We learn to trust GOD Almighty who tells us in the writings of Moses that if we obey the commandments, there are no illnesses of Egypt. We can keep motivated and have gratitude to persevere despite the times that we live in. 

Quotes from Flu The Story of the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 and the Search for the Virus That Caused It- Gina Kolata

Dr. Jonas Salk

 Dr. Jonas Salk

Interpretacion a otros lenguajes

Dr. Jonas Salk was the individual that created the polio vaccines that used polio virus that was killed with formaldehyde to prevent polio. We learn that Dr. Jonas Salk's polio vaccine was available in 1955 although, he had tested the vaccine for years.

We learn that poliomyelitis was a disease that afflicted individuals causing degeneration of the lower extremities to the point that individuals needed knee braces and walkers to move. We learn that Dr. Jonas Salk worked diligently to create the polio vaccine that allowed individuals to not develop polio. We learn that after 8-10 years of research, we learn that the vaccine was approved for public use in 1955. 

Dr. Jonas Salk created the polio vaccine by destroying the polio virus with formaldehyde and creating a serum that was able to be injected. This was with the intention that the vaccine would cause antibodies to be developed to the polio virus if individuals were to be infected with polio. We learn that the polio vaccine invented by Dr. Salk was effective and efficient at preventing illnesses from polio including preventing severe infection that led to weakness or paralysis of the lower limbs.

We learn that the polio vaccine was one of the greatest medical discoveries in the past century because it was able to help prevent poliomyelitis. We learn that poliomyelitis was a debilitating disease that did not have a cure once it caused severe illness. We learn that science can be used for the good of individuals, yet there must be healthy skepticism about how vaccines are developed and approved. We learn that the polio vaccine took 8-10 years to successfully develop and research, yet was effective at preventing poliomyelitis and thus preventing lower limb paralysis. Dr. Salk also decided to give the vaccine for free choosing not to patent the vaccine meaning that he did not want to make extensive wealth from the vaccine and instead wanted individuals to not develop polio. This describes that there are good individuals that have existed and exist who choose to work for good and not for other reasons.

“Well, the people, I would say. Could you patent the sun?”- Dr. Jonas Salk's Response to Being Asked Who Owns the Patent of the Polyomielitis Vaccine in 1955

Johann Czermak

 Johann Czermak

Czermak was a Polish professor of physiology who was able to create the laryngoscope in the 1800s. Czermak was able to allow for physicians to be able to visualize the ears, nose, and throat of patients. We learn that the laryngoscope allows for the inner ear to be visualized to rule out infections of the ear. The throat can also be visualized to diagnose or rule out upper respiratory infections. With the invention of the laryngoscope, medicine was able to allow the learning of diagnosing diseases through inspection and visualization.

The laryngoscope created in 1857 was another medical invention that allowed for medicine to help patients (Technopoly page 100). The laryngoscope helps physicians rule out diseases described in measles, mumps, and rubeola, diphteria, and strep throat infections while also helping diagnose viral infections. Along with the stethoscope and opthalmoscope, medical inventions in the 1800s allowed the visualization and auscultation of the body to diagnose disease. 

We learn that the 1800s were important because of the medical innovations that allowed for medicine to help against disease. These medical creations helped improve the knowledge of medicine by allowing the study of exam findings that were introduced by the use of these new inventions. There are medical books that describe common exam findings through the use of the laryngoscope, stethoscope, and ophtalmoscope. 

We can persevere learning about medicine and microbiology while maintaing morality and ethics. We can appreciate learning something new everyday while keeping healthy skepticism about newer medications and "vaccines" (covid) that may not be helpful. We learn that we still do not know the source of the covid "virus" being that all viruses have a source or reservoir. We can keep learning while guarding ourselves from pseudo-science.

René Theophile Hyacinthe Laënnec

 René Theophile Hyacinthe Laënnec

Laënnec was a French physician in the 1800s who was able to create the stethoscope. The stethoscope is an important instrument that allows individuals to listen to the heart and abdominal sounds. The stethoscope was created to listen to the heart sounds and allow physicians to diagnose and rule out diseases. We learn that Laënnec created the stethoscope in 1816 in order to listen to the heart of a patient. The stethoscope along with the ophthalmoscope and laryngoscope have helped physicians diagnose disease in the physical exam.

We learn that Laënnec was able to have difficulty hearing the heart sounds of a patient and decided to roll up a paper into a cylinder and hear the heart sounds by placing one end of the paper into the patient's chest and the other end of the paper to his ear. After realizing that he could auscultate and listen to the heart sounds of a patient understanding how sound travels, Laënnec decided to create the stethoscope. 

In the 1800s, the stethoscope was able to help physicians diagnose tuberculosis. We learn that tuberculosis is a dangerous disease that severely affected individuals in the 1800s. We learn that diseases were able to be diagnosed with the help of the stethoscope. The stethoscope is able to hear the heart sounds. The heart can also produce abnormal sounds that are different from the healthy "lub dub" that is commonly heard when there is illness. The stethoscope can also hear the sound of the lungs and help diagnose respiratory illnesses.

The stethoscope can also help listen to the abdominal sounds to understand if the abdomen is healthy. For these specific reasons, the stethoscope became a great tool that can help diagnose disease or illness. In the 1800s, there were new medical inventions and also the understanding of germ theory. These medical inventions and understanding of microbiology and medical knowledge allowed great progress to be made against diseases. We can be grateful for the medical innovations and medical knowledge that allowed for the prevention of medical illness.

Hermann Van Helmholtz

 Hermann Van Helmholtz

In the 1800s, there was progress made in science due to the microscope and understanding of germ theory. We learn that Louis Pasteur along with Robert Koch and Paul Ehrlich allowed individuals to learn about the importance of microbiology and the scientific method. There were important medical discoveries made in the 1800s including new medical equipment described in the ophthalmoscope, laryngoscope, and stethoscope. 

Herman Van Helmholtz was able to create the ophthalmoscope that allows for the eyes to be viewed. The ophthalmoscope was created after the stethoscope and before the laryngoscope. The stethoscope allows individuals to hear heart beats and abdominal sounds while the laryngoscope allows for the ears and throat to be visualized with the help of technology. We learn that the ophthalmoscope allows for the optic nerve behind the eyes to be seen to rule out diseases of the brain. The ophthalmoscope was a new medical invention that allowed physicians to test their differential diagnosis and rule out disease. 

The 1800s allowed for new innovations in medicine to help diagnose and treat patients. We learn that there have been innovations in medicine in the past centuries. In 1850, Hermann van Helmholtz was able to create and develop the ophthalmoscope that is among the most recognized medical instruments of medicine. The ophthalmoscope can help visualize the optic nerves to make sure that there is no swelling or pathology in the brain.

We learn that medicine is a tool that can be used to help diagnose and treat patients, yet there is the need to have integrity and morals. We learn that there have been advances in medicine in the past centuries in medication with the discovery of penicillin, acetaminophen, and aspirin. We learn that the ophthalmoscope, stethoscope, and laryngoscope have helped in the physicial exam. There have been advances in imaging in ultrasounds and CT scans. Yet, we learn that with the advances of medicine, there is the need of ethics and morality. 

Louis Pasteur

 Louis Pasteur

Interpretacion a otros lenguajes

Louis Pasteur was a scientist and discoverer of the germ theory. We learn that Louis Pasteur was able to figure out the manner that germs caused sickness and that the process of producing milk from cows required heat to prevent sickness. We know that unpasteurized milk can cause sickness in individuals. We learn that milk first needed to be heated in order to remove any microbes or bacteria that can cause sickness. We know that this was during the 1800s that germ theory was discovered by Louis Pasteur.

We know that there have been myths and fake stories about how the Europeans knew that they had brought blankets covered with germs to the New World being that germ theory was not discovered until the 1800s. We know that Christopher Columbus discovered America in 1492. This describes that germ theory was not known at the time of the explorers in the 1500s. We know that they were seeking to preach to the New World so that individuals could accept and confess King Jesus Christ Eternal LORD and Savior, repent of sin, and obey the commandments to obtain eternal salvation in King Jesus Christ. We know that we are not supposed to believe temporary lies from false sources. We know that schools and churches were planted in the New World by missionaries that helped provide stability and serenity so that everyone could thrive and improve.

We learn that Louis Pasteur was able to discover the germ theory allowing us to know that there is bacteria, microorganisms, parasites, and fungi that exist that are microscopic. The only manner to view the microorganisms is through the help of microscopes and lenses. We know that the microbiome of individuals consist of many different microorganisms and bacteria. Some are helpful and others that are not. However this was not discovered after the 1800s. We learn that germ theory allows us to know about the importance of science while at the same time knowing that we prioritize the worship of GOD Almighty. We know that while science can help explain specific questions, we know that science is flawed and not perfect. We know that science can not explain everything because it is not perfect. We know that GOD Almighty is perfect and helps us know that we need to have faith in GOD Almighty to help us persevere. 

We know that in these times we can learn about science while at the same time having healthy skepticism due to the questions that have surfaced concerning covid "vaccines", the efficacy, the number of vaccinations needed to be considered "fully vaccinated", the source of the covid "virus", the source of the covid "variants", the need to vaccinate when the vaccine was created in nine months without having 8-10 years of research, and the side effects of the vaccine. We know that there are a large number of questions that allow us to practice healthy scientific skepticism while trusting in GOD Almighty above everything. We know that we can learn about science without letting science be everything. 

Louis Pasteur Discovered That the Fermentation Process of Beer and Wine is Caused by Microorganisms and Helped Discover Bacteria in the Silk Industry

“In the second half of the nineteenth century, medical science took a giant leap forward. Microbiology, the study of infectious microorganisms, or germs, began shortly after Louis Pasteur accepted a position as chair of the department of chemistry at the University of Lille, in the north of France. The local industry relied upon the precise harnessing of fermentation in the production of beer and wine, and the making of alcohol from beet juice. Pasteur's work on the industrial problems associated with fermentation was caused by live organisms. Pasteur also discovered the difference between yeast, which appeared round when viewed through a microscope and turned out to be essential for fermentation, and bacteria, which appeared rod shaped under the microscope and turned out to be responsible for “souring” the beer.”- Overdo$ed America (page 194)

Louis Pasteur was able to discover that the fermentation process of beer and of wine is caused by a yeast. Louis Pasteur was able to understand that live microorganisms were responsible for the process of making beer and wine. We learn that this was discovered in the 1800s. Louis Pasteur is considered one of the best microbiologists in the 19th century because he was able to discover the mechanism behind fermentation that leads to the production of beer and wine, vaccines for anthrax in cattle and rabies in humans, and also discover that a bacteria was responsible for the silk industries difficulties.

We learn that Louis Pasteur would also be able to discover that the problems that were occuring in the silk business was because of a bacteria that was affecting the silk worms. Silk worms are able to spin silk and are important for the creation of silk items. Louis Pasteur was able to deduce through the scientific method that the reason that the silk worms were unable to produce silk was due to illness caused by a bacteria. 

Louis Pasteur Discovered Germ Theory and Created Vaccines in the 1800s

"He went on to develop an anthrax vaccine, made from a weakened strain of the disease that caused only a mild illness, but then protected vaccinated sheep and cattle from getting the full blown disease."- (page 194)

The industriousness and discipline of Louis Pasteur allowed him to discover an understanding of the germ theory in the 1800s. Louis Pasteur was able to discover the reason that cows were getting sick in France. Louis Pasteur was able to learn that anthrax was a bacteria that caused sickness in cattle. Louis Pasteur was able to create a vaccine that could innoculate cattle from developing the disease based on the bacteria. This describes how science can be used for good and how vaccines were created in the 1800s to prevent disease.

Louis Pasteur was then able to create a vaccine against the rabies virus in the 1800s. Louis Pasteur was able to gather tissue from rabid rabbits, air dry them, and develop vaccinations. There was an individual that was bitten by a rabid dog and Louis Pasteur innoculated the individual with the rabies vaccine. The individual survived. Louis Pasteur went on to treat more than 2,000 people with rabies and only one person died. This is astounding being that Louis Pasteur created the vaccine in the 1800s, discovered germ theory, and still made a vaccine against anthrax bacteria. Louis Pasteur is considered one of the greatest microbiologists of all times. 

The Socialist Nazis Also Went After Louis Pasteur

There are stories that state that the socialist nazis were envious and resentful. After the death of Louis Pasteur, Louis Pasteur was placed in a crypt. The nazi socialists went to France to investigate Louis Pasteur's place of residence and wanted his crypt to be opened so that they could try to find information about science, innovations, or attempt to understand Louis Pasteur's brilliance. This describes how the nazi socialists were envious and even went after Louis Pasteur post-humously. We know that Louis Pasteur was the greatest biologist in the 1800s for his discoveries and inventions in science.

Even amidst all of this, the nazi socialists went to persecute individuals and attempted to make them reveal Louis Pasteur's crypt. The individual in charge of the crypt denied helping the nazi socialists being that he was the individual that Louis Pasteur helped by immunizing him with the rabbies vaccine after he was bit by a rabbid dog. The individual denied cooperating with the nazi socialists. This is interesting seeing how socialism is the religion of envy and should be avoided. We learn that Louis Pasteur was amazing because of his dedication and discipline for science, and the nazi socialists were most likely envious. This story helps us know that socialism is not good and should be avoided.

Paul Ehrlich

 Paul Ehrlich

Paul Ehrlich was a German physician who was the assistant of Robert Koch. Paul Ehrlich was able to know about Koch's postulate and was able to discover the cause of malaria and sleeping sickness. Malaria is caused by a virus found in mosquitos. There are different kinds of malaria that exist and are transmitted by the bite of a mosquito. We learn that this was discovered in the 1800s. Paul Ehrlich also discovered that the sleeping sickness is caused by the bite of the tse-tse fly that transmits a virus. 

We learn that germ theory allowed individuals to know that diseases are caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, and microorganisms. With the understanding of the germ theory, there were new medications created and methods to prevent disease. The germ theory describes the importance of utilizing science for good. We have learned that science can be used for good and for the betterment of society.

However, we learn that science is a tool that can be misused. We can decide to persevere knowing the difference between real science and pseudo-science. We know that there have been improvements in medicine in the past due to the integrity and ethics of scientists. We can persevere learning about science so that we can avoid pseudo-science, medications, and vaccines that may not actually help.

We learn that there have been great scientists including Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch, Paul Ehrlich, Dr. Jonas Salks, and Dr. Albert Sabin. We can learn about biology, chemistry, physics, and medicine so that we know real science from fake science. This is also important due to the amount of information that is being produced. We learn that we need to persevere with gratitude for the advances in science treatments and disease prevention that have been discovered over hundreds of years while remaining skeptical about newer medication and vaccines that may not actually be beneficial to our health.

Robert Koch

Robert Koch 

Along with Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch was a German physician who was able to describe further information about germ theory in the 1800s. We learn that Koch was able to create a postulate that describes how bacteria and germs can be transmitted from person to person. Koch was able to describe how there are microorganisms that can cause sickness. Louis Pasteur was able to describe that the bacteria anthrax was the cause of the sicknesses that were affecting the cattle in the 1800s in France.

Koch was able to find out greater information about microorganisms and the manner that they are transmitted. Robert Koch was able to discover that the cause of the disease tuberculosis was a bacteria, the tubercle bacillus. Koch was able to go on to describe microorganisms that caused several diseases including cholera, typhoid, and diphtheria. Based on Robert Koch's findings, treatments and  methods of preventing diseases were able to be discovered for specific diseases. 

Robert Koch's postulate describes that microorganisms like the tuberculosis bacteria can be extracted from infected tissue, grown in culture, cause the disease when injected in lab animals, be extracted from the lab animals, and be grown again in culture. These steps describe Koch's postulate that allow scientists to know if a certain microorganism is the cause of disease. We learn that Robert Koch was able to discover the cause of some diseases and helped obtain greater information about germ theory in 1882 (page 195) of the book Overdo$ed America. 

Germ theory was not known before the 1800s. These improvements in scientific knowledge allowed individuals to create medications and describe methods of preventing disease. However we know that this was not known until the 1800s. This knowledge allows us to know that the Pilgrims could not have known that they were carriers of specific microorganisms in the 1500s and refutes the lies told by post-modern and socialist propaganda.