Thursday, March 12, 2026

The Movie Bicentennial Man

                 The Movie Bicentennial Man

The movie Bicentennial Man was one of the greatest movies produced in the 1990s. The movie was opposed by socialists because it spoke out against the transhumanism agenda of the marxists. Socialist enviers criticized the movie because it depicted a robot that did not want to be a robot. Instead the robot wanted to be human describing that being human is better than being a robot.

Socialist enviers gave the movie a three out of ten stars without actually using contructive criticism. Instead socialists criticized that the movie was bad because it was bad. The real reason was that marxist socialists told the movie critics to negatively criticize the great movie. Despite the envy and undue negativity from marxist socialists from the monetarily wealthy class, the movie was shown in theaters and actually generated revenue. 

The movie is considered among the greatest movies because it is relevant to our times describing that it is better to be human than a robot. The movie was disliked by marxists because it was actually unique and distinct. It was not pro-transhumanism agenda and it was not similar to other movies like the Bionic Woman series that looked to promote being a robot since the 1970s 

Despite the movie being a nine out of ten or ten out of ten, the movie was hated and unjustly critiqued by marxist socialists (who were told to negatively criticize the movie. This was to prevent competition in cinema obviously since the movie was great and is considered one of the greatest movies of the 1990s. Instead of critiquing the movie with pros and cons, they negatively critiqued the movie. This was to prevent individuals from seeing the movie based on bad reviews. The intention of the marxists was to prevent individuals from seeing the movie based on bad reviews.) This was when movies were being opposed in the 1990s for speaking truth and also being amazing including War Inc. and Small Soldiers (both movies were also given low scores arbitrarily despite being amazing works of cinema). In the 1990s, good movies were being opposed by marxist socialists for instructing pacifism, values, and goodness. Despite the negativity, the movie actually taught the need to not believe marxist propaganda about the need to be a robot. If the robot wanted to be a human, that tells us all of the transhumanist agenda.

Didier Drogba

 Didier Drogba


Didier Drogba was a soccer player that played for the national team of the Ivory Coast and also for Chelsea. Drogba was able to be an amazing striking forward who scored multiple goals. Drogba was able to win a Champion's League Final playing against Barcelona in the 2010s. 

During the impressive final, Barcelona was neutralized through an impressive defense that led to an amazing competitive soccer match. Drogba played in the winger position instead of the striking forward position for the match against Barcelona. This was because Chelsea was using a defense that prioritized containing an impressive attack.

Drogba instead of staying on top was seen sprinting down to midfield and defense. Drogba was able to play defense instead of staying in the top half of the field. The defensive strategy utilized a defense that was able to prevent the scoring of Barcelona's strikers and midfield which had utilized tiki taka (a strategy of constant passes and pressuring when defending) to keep the ball and control the midfield. 

Chelsea was able to play an impressive 90 minutes that prevented any scoring from Barcelona. Drogba played midfielder throughout the match, and Chelsea was able to keep Barcelona from scoring. Through a counter attack, Chelsea beat Barcelona. The match was fantastic seeing how no team had posed opposition to Barcelona's winning streak in the Champion's until Chelsea was able to utilize an impressive defense strategy that neutralized Barcelona's attack. This describes how competive soccer is impressive and how sports are supposed to allow for competition. We can remind ourselves that despite the non-compete times that we live in, we can persevere seeing the positive side of life. Sports are supposed to allow for true competition without favoritism and allow for healthy competition. Socialists hate competition. This amazing Champion's Final also happened prior to covid. We can persevere knowing that socialism also has prevented sports from being competitive including in American football in the 2010s and baseball in the 1940s. 

---

Figures of History and Individualism is created to describe the importance of being ethical and disciplined. We can persevere learning from positive examples while not worshiping people. We can learn from amazing athletes that it is possible to improve with dedication and avoid indiscipline. Amazing athletes can help us learn about the importance of self-improvement. We can appreciate sports and talented athletes without having to worship individuals. If anything tries to lead far from the worship of GOD Almighty, then we make sure to prioritize the worship of GOD Almighty.

Motivational Quotes, Encouragement, and Practicing Gratitude

 Motivational Quotes, Encouragement, and Practicing Gratitude


Developing Self-Discipline

"Habits that took years to build do not take a day to change."

Developing perseverence and self-discipline allows us to be persistent and positive. Positive habits prevents us from having vices. Being diligent and self-disciplined allows us to be industrious. We can use our time for good and not waste it by being slothful and lazy.


The Importance of Optimism

"I have tried in my time to be a philosopher, but cheerfulness always kept breaking in."

This quote from Oliver Edwards describes how there is a need to be an optimist and persevere with happiness. We know that socialism tries to make the world into a worse place while gratitude and positivity allows us to persist. There are false philosophies of disbelief like nihilism and atheism that were created by idolators to diminish optimism. We can avoid false philosophies that want to lead to socialism like atheism and nihilism. 


The Importance of Happiness

"Happiness cannot be pursued but it must ensue."

We learn that Viktor E. Frankl described that we do not have to pursue happiness and instead are happy when we realize that our life has meaning and purpose. Acknowledging that we can persevere with gratitude and meaning allows us to persist with happiness and motivation. We learn that we have intrinsic value that provides happiness that does not require extrinsic things.


The Importance of Integrity

"To practice good is noble. To teach others to practice good is even nobler."

Mark Twain has a saying about the importance of practicing integrity. Twain described that it is necessary to practice goodness and integrity and also to teach the importance of practicing integrity. This quote does not mean that instructing the practice of integrity is greater than practing integrity. It means that we need to practice integrity and also teach the importance of integrity to others. This prevents hypocrisy. Twain wrote Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer which described the importance of humility and integrity. 


The Importance of Optimism

"In other words, what matters is to make the best of any given situation."

Viktor E. Frankl described that there is the need to keep optimism despite negativity and opposition. Frankl lived his life practicing positivity. We can persevere seeing the positive side of life. We can always be grateful for the good things that we have. Even in the not so good times, we can be grateful to persevere with virtues. We can keep writing and preaching for the worship of GOD Almighty despite envy. Frankl survived to long life for keeping optimism and saw the decline of nazi socialism.

The Importance of Optimism

"And this in turn presupposes the human capacity to creatively turn life's negative aspects into something positive or constructive."- Viktor E. Frankl

Viktor E. Frankl described how it is better to persevere with optimism than to be a pessimist. We learn that optimism is better than negativity. Optimism leads to positivity and keeping a positive demeanor despite opposition, adversity, or persecution. Frankl described how remaining an optimist allowed him to persevere despite persecution from nazi socialists. Frankl memorized the Psalms of David, kept a sense of humor, persisted with integrity and empathy, and was an optimist. Frankl lived to 93 years of age outliving Hitler who took a cyanide pellet and died. 


The Importance of Autonomy

"Man has both potentialities within himself [good and evil]; which one is actualized depends on decisions not on conditions."

Viktor E. Frankl described how we are born with autonomy and can keep persevering with autonomy. While socialism tries to say that genetics or environment are to blame, each individual has autonomy to persevere with integrity and courage. Frankl kept to his ideals and values and outlived Hitler. Frankl never became an informant snitch and also kept empathy despite persecution. Frankl's faith and integrity allowed Frankl to thrive and demonstrate that conditions do not dictate who we are. We are born with autonomy to keep being brave and courageous instead of socialist cowards.


The Importance of Avoiding Negative Information

"Television is as injurious to the soul as fast food is to the body."

This quote by Quentin Crisp (recently found out he was a homosexual and do not agree with that lifestyle yet the quote is good) describes how we should avoid negative and false information. We have seen since the 2010s how television had turned more nihilistic and negative including having negative series. Except for sermons, educative programming, and sports, most television programming was negative. We should avoid false and discouraging information (same applies to Youtube).


Persevering Seeing the Good in Life

"There is not a lot of money in poetry, yet there is not a lot of poetry in money either."

There is a quote that states that in the life of poets there is not much stagflated currency. Yet, we learn that there is not much beauty and positivity in the love of money either. Robert Frost's life describes that it is better to choose positivity than the love of stagflated currency. Robert Frost became one of the best if not the best poet of all time winning four Pulitzer's.


Persevering With Meaning and Purpose

"(In 1962) another statistical survey, of 7,948 students at forty-eight colleges, was conducted by social scientists from Johns Hopkins University. Their preliminary report is part of a two year study sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health. Asked what they considered very important to them now, 16 percent of the students checked 'making a lot of money'; 78 percent said that their first goal was 'finding a purpose and meaning to my life.'"- (page 122)

In the 1960s, students at Johns Hopkins University described that having meaning and purpose was more important to them than money. We learn that the worship of GOD Almighty is greater than the temporary things of the world including money. It has been only in recent decades that idolatry and lies have attempted to make it seem that money is more important to lead to the road of destruction. We can prefer GOD Almighty instead of stagflated currency.


The Importance of Autonomy

"A human being is not one thing among others; things determine each other, but man is ultimately self-determining."- Viktor E. Frankl

Frankl described how each individual is born with autonomy to decide if they want to persevere with bravery and goodness. Frankl described how there were righteous individuals who never became corrupted despite persecution and opposition. There were individuals with integrity who behaved similar to saints while wicked individuals devolved to swine.


Persevering With Bravery

"You never know how strong you are, until being strong is your only choice."- Bob Marley

Bob Marley was a pacifist who was envied and persecuted by socialists. He was creative and industrious. Despite envy, Marley sang about pacifism, genuine empathy, and kindness. Marley also wrote lyrics, sang, played guitar, and led his band (being the musician of the 1990s). Because his music was unique and distinct, he was probably envied. Marley still spoke about the importance of bravery and filial love.


Persevering With Gratitude and Humbleness

"My riches consist not in the extent of my material resources, but in the fewness of my wants."- Quote from PositiveSoup

This quote may have been inspired by Stoicism. We learn that Marcus Aurelius also spoke about the need to eliminate coveting and negative emotions. Marcus Aurelius probably was influenced and inspired by Christianity. We learn that life is more than material resources. We learn that the worship of GOD Almighty and genuine empathy are greater than temporary wealth, false relationships, idol worship, and coveting.


Denying the Illusion of Power

"Ultimate power corrupts ultimately."- George Orwell

George Orwell criticized totalitarianism and fascism seen in socialist dictatorships. We learn that socialist dictatorships have collapsed due to the practice deceit, envy, division, and greed. From Mussolini to Hitler to Stalin, the illusion of "power" has led socialists to create barren dystopias. We learn that power is to be used responsibly along with honesty and other virtues to prevent misuse. Misuse of power is judged by King Jesus Christ. We learn that amazing leaders used their power for good and helped others described in Churchill, Eisenhower, JFK, MLK, Thatcher, Carter, Reagen, and Pope John Paul II.


The Importance of Autonomy and Integrity

 “The final forming of a person’s character lies in their own hands.” – Anne Marie Frank

Anne Frank described the importance of autonomy and persevering with goodness. Despite temptation and persecution, we can persevere speaking truth and practicing righteousness. Frank similar to Frankl described that an individual can persist with morality despite circumstances, opposition, and persecution.


The Importance of Loving GOD Almighty Above Everything, Genuine Empathy, and Responsibility

[The fear of the LORD] creates people who are led by responsibility, by responsible love. Responsibility and responsible love creates righteous set apart, true Christians, to whom the future of the world ultimately belongs."- Pope John Paul II

Pope John Paul II described that loving GOD Almighty above everything creates autonomous and responsible individuals. We learn that with freedom we also need to be responsible to avoid irresponsibility and immaturity seen in socialism and communism that is idolatry. (We can practice empathy while avoiding treacherous rat snake socialists.)


Persevering With Integrity and Values

"There are some authors who contend that meanings and values are 'nothing but defense mechanisms, reaction formations, and sublimations.' But as for myself, I would not be willing to live merely for the sake of my 'defense mechanisms,' nor would I be ready to die merely for the sake of my 'reaction formations'. Man, however, is able to live and even die for the sake of his ideals and values!"- Viktor E. Frankl

Viktor E. Frankl described the importance of having integrity and practicing morality that allows us to persevere through everything. Frankl's integrity and positivity describes that it is better to be ethical than wicked and treacherous. Idolatry hates that individuals are righteous and moral because then they do not want to practice sin and foolishness. Integrity keeps us far away from the path of destruction.


Logotherapy Gives Meaning and Purpose to Persevere Despite Circumstances

"It is one of the basic tenets of logotherapy that man's main concern is not to gain pleasure or to avoid pain but rather to see meaning in his life."- Viktor E. Frankl

Logotherapy is better than Adlerian and Freudian psychology because having meaning  and purpose allows us to persist without being discouraged. When the there is no longer continous momentary pleasure (Freudian psychology) in life, is life still worth living? When there is no longer temporary power (Adlerian psychology), is life still worth living? Yet in the worship of GOD Almighty life is always worth living because GOD Almighty is greater than momentary pleasure and the illusion of power.


Logotherapy Tells Us to Persevere Being Optimistic and Industrious

"Logotherapy, keeping in mind the essential transitoriness of human existence, is not pessimistic but rather activistic."- Viktor E. Frankl

Viktor E. Frankl told us that despite the transitoriness of life, we can avoid having negative emotions by having gratitude. Even when there are changes in life such as transitions, we can persevere being proactive and industrious. Frankl persevered when he could not practice medicine by writing and encouraging others. Solzhenytsin was envied and could not keep being a soldier, yet wrote and converted to Christianity. Gregory Grigoriev was sent to gulag yet never became an informant and denied temptations to sin in order to have soft jobs. Grigoriev grew younger with age never becoming a socialist. Kozyrev learned physics and astronomy by memorizing a book in two days to keep working on and innovating the field of astrophysics while he was envied.We can always be proactive and industrious even during non-optimal times.


Persevering With Meaning and Purpose

"Man's search for meaning is the primary motivation in his life and not a 'secondary rationalization' of instinctual drives."- Viktor E. Frankl

We are created by GOD Almighty to worship GOD Almighty for all eternity in the New Earth and New Jerusalem. We are created with eternal meaning and purpose. This understanding allows us to avoid temporary lies from idolatry that says that pleasure (Freudian psychology) or power (Adlerian psychology) are to be prioritized.


The Importance of Autonomy and Freedom

"As for others, I do not know what course they will take, but for me give me liberty or give me death."- Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry was an American who fought against tyranny. While individuals in 1776 were divided on whether they should keep abiding with totalitarian British mandates or seek autonomy, Americans decided to be independant from England. Patrick Henry stated this quote in support of the American Revolution. Despite fighting against the super power at that time and also treacherous snakes like Benedict Arnold, Americans obtained their liberty. We can keep fighting by preaching truth, worshiping GOD Almighty above everything, and leaving the vengeance to King Jesus Christ.


Persevering With Bravery and Autonomy

"This will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave."- Elmer Davis

Despite not living in the best of times, we can persevere with courage and being distinct and unique. We learn that autonomy and freedom are important. We can persist without being socialist cowards who want to restrict sovereignty, freedom of speech, liberty, privacy, bravery, industriousness, and autonomy. 


Persevering With Righteousness and Self-Confidence

"Confidence is not, 'They will like me.' Confidence is, 'I will be fine if they do not.'"

We have seen in history that amazing men and women decided to practice righteousness and never gave in to iniquity. We can persevere acknowledging that GOD Almighty is most important over everything including fake people.


The Importance of Autonomy and Justice

"Free at last, free at last, thank GOD Almighty, we are free at last."- MLK's I have a Dream Speech in the March on Washington

MLK's persistence to fight against bigotry and racism is not only admirable but also impressive. MLK would receive the Nobel Peace Prize for fighting segregation and Jim Crowe laws in the United States in 1964. MLK had gratitude to GOD Almighty for being able to accomplish such great actions and never gave up despite opposition from Hoover, Sullivan, the FBI, and socialist racist cowards.


The Importance of Genuine Empathy

"America did not create human rights, human rights created America."- Jimmy Carter

President Jimmy Carter stated that America did not create human rights and instead human rights created America. The Pilgrims and Puritans fled persecution in England to profess their faith in GOD Almighty. Obeying the commandments of Moses allows us to recognize the importance of genuine empathy. The Civil Rights Movement allowed us to understand that racism, corruption, and envy have no place in civil society.


Gratitude and Happiness

"In this life we are all just walking up the mountain, and we can sing as we climb or we can complain about our sore feet. Whichever we choose, we still have to do the hike. I decided a long time ago, singing made a lot more sense."

This quote describes the importance of positivity and happiness instead of being negative and hateful. We can choose to persevere with gratitude instead of being resentful.


Having Purpose and Meaning

"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value."- Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein was a humble scientist who despite being gifted in science attributed his renown to being curious and self-didactic. Einstein was persecuted by nazi socialists, yet kept being industrious despite intimidations and envy. Einstein did not care about the fame and instead cared about being self-didactic. Einstein would remain humble despite being one of the greatest scientists and refused to be president of Israel when offered the position. Einstein preferred to keep learning and write about science.


On Cherishing Happiness

"Happiness is like a butterfly; the more you chase it, the more it will elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come and sit softly on your shoulder."- Henry David Thoreau

Viktor E. Frankl described that happiness is not pursued and instead it must ensue from having meaning and purpose. The worship of GOD Almighty allows us to have eternal meaning and purpose and also true happiness that does not fade. 


Persevering Despite Opposition and Envy

"We shall never surrender."- Winston Spencer Churchill

Winston Churchill galvenized the United States and Europe to fight against the nazi socialists. While there were coward politicians that wanted to capitulate to the nazi socialists, Churchill's bravery mounted a resistance against racism and envy. Churchill did not back down and decided to fight against the persecution of Jewish individuals and false ideologies of envy. Churchill allowed for the United States to make the right choice and fight against totalitarianism and racism. Dwight D. Eisenhower would command the Allied Forces and defeat the racist nazi socialists. Despite the opposition, Churchill's bravery is cherished and remembered for fighting against cowardice and envy. Even when it appeared that the nazi socialists were expanding, Churchill's valor caused socialist nazism to decline after the Second World War. While racism and hate still exists, the power of love and genuine empathy is far greater. The Nuremberg Trials described that racism is not needed in civil society.


Prioritizing the Worship of GOD Almighty and Not Materialism and Coveting

"Trying to be happy by accumulating possessions is like trying to satisfy hunger by taping sandwiches all over your body."- George Carlin

George Carlin was a comedian who began rebelling against discipline and righteousness in the 1950s, yet by the 2000s he had changed his mind and made stand up routines criticizing post-modernism, idolatry, and materialism. Carlin has interesting sayings against coveting and also the manner that post-modernism has attempted to change vocabulary words so that they do not "offend" while in reality it is to limit free speech. Carlin noticed that temporary material wealth is not the source of happiness. Carlin would also criticize post-modernism for its fakeness despite being rebellious and idolatrous in the 1950s. 


Persevering With Gratitude and Maturity

"He who is of a calm and happy nature will hardly feel the pressure of age, but to him who is of an opposite disposition, youth and age are equally a burden."- Plato

This quote of Plato describes that individuals who are humble and practice gratitude persevere with serenity and happiness. Individuals that have envy and anger do not have serenity and peace. We learn that youth and age can be seen in a positive light without negativity knowing that youth teaches us the importance of correction and learning while age teaches us the value of wisdom and gratitude. 


Seeing Age With Positivity

"Wrinkles should merely indicate where the smiles have been."- Mark Twain

While post-modernism attempts to obsess over appearances and remaining youthful with countless cosmetic products and procedures, humility allows us to know that aging is normal. Instead of seeing wrinkles with worry and fear, we learn to appreciate that a human being is able to improve by placing their importance in the worship of GOD Almighty and having meaning and purpose. We learn that a human being can be amazing and beautiful because of the worship of GOD Almighty and practice of genuine empathy. (This needs to be said due to post-modernisms attempts to get individuals to compare themselves to others. 19 year olds do not need cosmetic procedures.)


The Importance of True Happiness

"Remember, you can not hold happiness in your fist. You can only hold happiness in your hand."

There is a quote that reminds us that true happiness happens when we decide to be grateful and authentic instead of resentful and envious. True happiness happens when we dedicate ourselves to something greater than ourselves describing the worship of GOD Almighty. We begin to appreciate the good things that we have instead of envying and coveting other people. True happiness is not fake nor coersed and instead is real and natural. It is not found in materialism, socialism, nor idolatry. 


On Genuineness and Authenticity

"Wanting to be someone else is a waste of the person you are."- Kurt Kobain

While not agreeing with the rock and roll lifestyle, Kurt Kobain described the importance of uniqueness and individuality in this quote. GOD Almighty created 8.2 billion people on the earth and each person is distinct and unique. Instead of fighting and envying over our differences, we can be grateful for being distinct and unique. We can also live in serenity with one another instead of hating and being in conflict for no reason. We do not have to compare ourselves to anyone because we are each distinct. (We also do not have to compare ourselves in comparitive social media based on false metrics and consumerism.)


Choosing Righteousness and Avoiding Wickedness (Idolatry)

"We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light."- Plato

We can persevere deciding to be ethical and moral while denying iniquity and envy. We can choose to doubt the lies of sin and choose to speak truth. We can choose to be brave and good instead of evil and foolish. We can outgrow our fears and choose to be brave instead of being envious cowards who practice hypocrisy and deceit.


Persevering With Genuine Empathy and No Hypocrisy

"The unexamined life is not worth living."-Socrates

We learn that we are meant to improve and keep getting better each day. Each day is a day to learn something new and also be grateful for learning positive life lessons. We are not meant to live a stagnated life hating and envying others.


The Importance of Humbleness and Industriousness 

"Work Hard and Stay Humble"

Being industrious allows us to be motivated and know that we have eternal meaning and purpose in the worship of GOD Almighty. Even with the covid "pandemic" preventing people from working and going to school (based on the need to get an experimental "vaccine"), preaching allows us to stay motivated and industrious speaking truth and writing for the worship of GOD Almighty. Humbleness prevents us from believing the deceit of the snake that wants individuals to be arrogant and envious of others without reason. Industriousness and being humble prevents us from practicing sin and idolatry.


Expressing Gratitude Each Day

Each day we can remind ourselves of the positive and good things that we have. Having gratitude prevents ingratitude from leading to the practice of sin and idolatry.

1. Being able to read and be self-didactic despite opposition against people to be in school and have employment from the stingy, avaricious, and idolatrous socialists. There is a statistic that states that if you are able to read, you should be grateful because about 3 billion people in the world do not know how to read (this statistic was seen in the 2010s despite the advances of technology and supposed improvements in the world).

2. Not being covid "vaccinated"

3. Getting adequate exercise each day

4. Having a nutritious diet

5. Not practicing idol worship 


Persevering Without Resentments and Envy

“When people throw you stones, it is because you are a good tree full of fruits. They see a lot of harvest in you. Do not go down to their level by throwing them back the stones, but throw them your fruits so the seeds of yourself may inspire them to change their ways.”- positive quotes

This quote describes the need to not have resentments and to avoid negative emotions. We have all been reviled, envied, and hated at one point or another for no reason (most likely by idolators). Instead of harboring resentments of the past, we can persevere removing hate, anger, resentments, and bitterness and instead persevere with gladness, gratitude, resiliency, and serenity. This wisdom allows us to remove the burden that is negativity, envy, bitterness, and hate. We can also avoid the practice of idolatry, false prophets, and idolators.


Persevering With Self-Confidence

"Do not be so hard on yourself."

When we practice empathy, we also have to learn to take care of ourselves. We can learn to block out and remove non-constructive criticism and envy that is not needed from narcissists and idolators that have nothing good to offer and only offer lies and negative emotions. Practicing empathy does not mean that we have to listen to discouragements, revilings, and insults. We can choose to avoid narcissists and idolators who want others to be negative and bitter like they are.


Learning to Persevere With Self-Confidence Despite Envy and Discouragements from Idolators

"Not everyone has to like me. I can not force you to have good taste."

When we grow up and mature, we learn that not everyone has to like us, yet we can refuse to be disrespected by idolators who envy. There are idolators who envy and hate everything that is amazing and good. We have seen how idolators and socialists hate and envy amazing individuals from sport athletes like Pele with multiple world cup wins to amazing physicians who cared about their patients like Viktor E. Frankl and the psychiatrist who was dismissed for providing amazing care. We can persevere knowing that while there is envy due to the times that we live in, we can be far apart from slimy, backstabbing, socialist snakes. We can avoid such people who envy because we do not need the negative emotions nor the discouragements of lying hypocrites


Persevering Despite Persecution and Envy from Socialists


“One reason that GOD allows individuals to come against you is so that they can see, that even when they give you their worst, GOD still gives you His best.”

We learn from the Sacred Scriptures that impressive and amazing individuals were hated and envied by idolators. We learn to persevere knowing that these times are not so great and that despite the envy, we can persevere worshiping King Jesus Christ. We learn that envy has existed for a long time (about 5,992 or 5,993 years or so that earth has existed) and know that these are not the best of times because there is still envy. Despite not living in the best of times, we can acknowledge the things that we can not do in Shabbath Millennium. We learn that righteous individuals persevered despite envy from the snake and were able to persist to eternal salvation. We learn that despite envy, Paul persevered preaching and obtained eternal salvation despite hindrances, discouragements, and revilings from idolators. We learn that the story of Paul is impressive.


Persevering With Genuine Empathy


GOD Almighty tells us in Scripture that we are unique. GOD Almighty describes that we are created in the image of GOD Almighty. GOD Almighty tells us that we do not have to compare ourselves to anyone because we are each different, distinct, unique, and incomparable.” (quote from a graphic and still trying to find the source)

We can go to Scripture each day to remind ourselves of the truth. When the opposition tries to discourage, we can persevere reminding ourselves of the truth in Scripture that calls us unique, distinct, important, and cherished by GOD Almighty. If you were slandered, insulted, or envied in the past because of being a Christian, know that it has nothing to do with you. The envy is because the idolators hate everything that is good and amazing. We can remind ourselves of amazing stories of amazing individuals that were not enough for the idolators. We know that Moses was not good enough for the wicked individuals of Korah's rebellion even though he had divided the Red Sea, made water flow from a rock, made bread from heaven, defeated five idolatrous nations, and still taught wisdom. The idolators wanted to go back to Egypt. The midwives Shiprah and Puah did not listen to Pharaoh and decided to guard the children from the envy of Pharaoh. Shiprah was told to sin, and instead decided to trust in GOD Almighty guarding the children. Shiprah obeyed GOD Almighty and was favored instead of listening to the envy of Pharaoh. We know that David was discouraged by his own brothers for having bravery in wanting to fight Goliath and then being envied by Saul for destroying the giant that no one wanted to fight. Paul was supposedly “unimpressive” to the false apostles who wanted to discourage his ministry, and yet he preached despite Pharisees trying to slander him, oppose him, and hinder him from preaching. Paul endured discouragements from Pharisees, false apostles, adultress, and idolators and yet accomplished his purpose of preaching King Jesus Christ Eternal LORD and Savior. You do not have to listen to the lies of the snake that hates how individuals are unique and distinct in the worship of GOD Almighty. You are supposed to listen to the GOD of gods, GOD Almighty.


"In case no one told you today…

You are beautiful. You are loved. You are needed. You are alive for a reason. You are stronger than you think. You are going to get through this. I am glad you are alive. And do not ever give up." (quote from dailyhealthpost)

While we may not be living in the best of times, we need to keep reminding ourselves of the good things of life. We can always go to Scripture to find encouragement and motivation. We can go to prayer to ask GOD Almighty to help us persevere with perseverance and motivation. We can also see positive messages that remind us that we are cared for and cherished by our Creator. We can also avoid discouraging and envious false information of post-modernism (we do not have to believe the temporary lies of the snake that looks to discourage individuals from having empathy and happiness). We are reminded to keep being positive despite the not so good times that we are living in. This is to remind ourselves that we can persevere with courage and motivation knowing that we are meant to live in Shabbath Millennium for a Thousand Years and for all eternity in New Jerusalem. 


At some point everyone must decide if they are a creator or a critic, a person who loves or a person who hates, a person who gives or a person who takes.” (quote from positivesoup)

We can learn in life that there are only two paths. We learn that we can choose the path of life creating, practicing generosity, genuine empathy, and giving instead of envying, hating without reason, and being narcissistic and selfish. 


Helping People + Talent = Purpose

We learn from the Sacred Scriptures that we are supposed to love GOD Almighty above everything and respect humanity. This wisdom allows us to have purpose and meaning. We learn that we are supposed to worship GOD Almighty with our resources, talents, virtues, and time. We are also supposed to care about humanity and not hate others. We learn about this in the Parable of the Sower and the Parable of the Talents.


Psychologists Have Described the Importance of Wisdom

The development of this mature form of intelligence [wisdom] is brought about through a set of favorable life influences, including a willingness to learn from experience, interest in the well being of others, training, and mentoring by others.” (page 188 Health Development and Aging from Susan Krauss Whitbourne)

Psychologists have attempted to describe the importance of wisdom. From Scripture, we learn that obeying the commandments of Moses is the beginning of wisdom and the practice of sound judgment. This means that we can make good decisions when we decide to worship GOD Almighty above everything. We learn that psychologists have shown that wisdom is being mature and making sound decisions. Psychologists have described that individuals that choose to listen to and accept constructive criticism or reproof are able to be wise. Psychologists have shown that learning from experience is also important in developing wisdom. This describes that we are supposed to learn life lessons from experiences in life. We learn that we are able to learn lessons from life that prevent us from having ingratitude and envy. We are supposed to also care about others and practice empathy. We are supposed to accept reproof and also instruct wisdom that we may have to others so that they do not practice envy and hate. According to psychologists, wisdom is developed by having empathy and also learning from experiences and reproof. We can choose wisdom instead of envy and irresponsibility


"Humble enough to know that I am not better than anyone, yet wise enough to know that I am different from the rest." (quote from Bruce Lee)

We learn that humility is an important virtue to develop in this life. While in post-modern society, there have been lies told about the need to be arrogant and vain, humility and authenticity are qualities that shine. We learn that Bruce Lee described the importance of humility and authenticity. Humility and authenticity help us persevere with gratitude and happiness.


"Trials are mandatory but misery is optional."

We learn that in life there is persecution, trials, and tribulations, yet we know that we can persevere with happiness instead of discouragement. We learn that despite the discouragements of the snake, we can persevere worshiping GOD Almighty and forsaking idolatry that tries to lead to misery, envy, and coveting.


"I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious." (quote from Albert Einstein)

Albert Einstein was another individual who was humble and described the importance of humility. Albert Einstein described that he had no special talent while being gifted in science. Albert Einstein described that he was curious about learning and that was the reason he excelled at science. We can learn to be self-didactic and keep learning so that we can distinguish true science from pseudo-science.


Avoiding Narcissists and Fighting Narcissism

People motivate you or they drain you. Choose them wisely.”

This saying states that there are only two kinds of people. There are people that are good, righteous, helpful, and motivate us, and there are also those that are evil, negative, treacherous, and do not motivate us. We can choose to persevere practicing genuine empathy being good instead of deceitful and envious. We can also choose to be far apart from negative narcissists who hate others for no reason. There are negative individuals who actually want others to be angry, hate, and be envious and covetous. We know that those negative emotions drain individuals instead of helping them persevere with positive emotions and gratitude. I have persevered even after having “frienemies” (frienemies are worst than enemies because they are false, pretend to care about you, while they actually hate you. False friends that actually want to know how you are doing so that they can compare themselves and envy even more), yet GOD Almighty has allowed me to be far apart from those types of individuals. Someone who cares about you does not revile you, slander you, or insult you. Someone who genuinely cares about you wants to help and motivate you to be a better person instead of trying to diminish, hurt, and envy you. In these times, we must be careful because there are false prophets that are malignant narcissists that only want to lead to sin, idolatry, and destruction. We can choose to remove such people from our lives. When we do this, we actually feel better without the negativity and the negative emotions that they try to cause. People either motivate you or they drain you. 


"Just because you are a healer, a person who loves, a person who gives, a peacemaker, doesn't mean that you are obligated to heal, love, give, or share your space with everyone. Learn to hold space for yourself so you do not invite the vampires (narcissists) into your sanctuary."

We can persevere avoiding treacherous snakes that do not care about others and are narcissists. People who practice empathy can guard themselves from emotional vampires who want to discourage and cause negative emotions in others. Once we know individuals are narcissists and negative, we can avoid such people


What they hate is their own lack of self-control, so they try to control you. What they despise is your strength. What they hold in utmost contempt is your refusal to be controlled and to accept their lie that it is your fault.” (quote from simplereminders.com (Checked out the site and it seems to no longer be about fighting narcissism and instead is pro-socialism.)

When we persevere in the worship of GOD Almighty, there may be narcissists who attempt to discourage, envy, and oppose the preaching of truth. Prior to preaching, I also dealt with narcissists who attempted to discourage and demotivate me for no reason other than envy. We can learn to be far apart from narcissists who want to discourage others and hate that other individuals can improve and grow in virtues. Narcissists are false and flatter with their mouth while they also envy and hate. These individuals flatter and also revile and hate for no reason. This is because sin leads to stagnation and bitterness. We can separate ourselves from individuals that attempt to discourage us. Instead, we prosper by preaching truth and helping others escape the captivity and darkness that exists in idol worship and sin. (There are also malignant narcissists (false prophets) who do not want to know anything about truth and King Jesus Christ, so we must avoid malignant narcissists who envy for the sake of envying.)


The Ten Truths About Narcissism


  1. They know what they are doing.
  2. They know they are hurting you.
  3. They are doing it on purpose.
  4. They can control it (narcissism), just as they do when they are trying to impress someone.
  5. They could stop if they wanted to.
  6. They do not love you even if they say they do.
  7. They are not capable of empathy, compassion, or remorse.
  8. You can not change them.
  9. They are only capable of manipulation and control.
  10. They will not apologize. (quote from a graphic from barbedwire.narcissism from a facebook group. I have not been on facebook for over 9 years and have not checked the source, yet the quote speaks truth about narcissism and narcissists. I have not been on facebook in over 9 years because of psychologist studies that have proven that comparing oneself to others by going to comparitive social media causes decreases of self-esteem, envy, and resentments. Since leaving facebook for 9 years, I feel much better not having to compare myself to anyone knowing that GOD Almighty calls me unique and cared for.)

We can persevere without practicing narcissism and also avoiding false prophets who are narcissists. We can persevere practicing genuine empathy so that we do not practice hate and lust. Narcissism attempts to lead individuals to selfishness and envy that attempts to prevent individuals from having genuine empathy and gratitude. It is most likely that narcissists practice idol worship and explains why they can not practice genuine empathy nor care for others. We can learn to distinguish truth from temporary lies and persevere far apart from known narcissists. The gangstalkers are essentially narcissists and may include individuals from the past who can not get over past resentments. We can acknowledge the need to remove negative emotions and not hate because that is the intention of gangstalking. We can hate evil and that is wisdom. We can persevere being far apart from such individuals that have envy and bitterness due to the practice of idolatry. 




Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Literary Review of Overdo$ed America

 Literary Review of Overdo$ed America


Overdo$ed America written by Dr. Abramson describes how the pharmaceutical companies had created a monopoly through compromising medical journal articles, promoting newer and more expensive dangerous medications, and affecting the doctor patient relationship negatively through false advertisements (seen in Claritin). Dr. Abramson's book is a great work on medical ethics. The book details how it is possible to be ethical in medicine despite the corruption and deceit that has increased since the 1980s and 1990s. With pharmaceutical companies and health insurance companies attempting to take autonomy from primary care physicians since the 1980s, Dr. Abramson describes how it is still possible to remain ethical and moral by choosing to not be a part of corruption and deceit.

We learn that there is always a choice to remain ethical and practice integrity. There is the choice to persevere with morality despite the temporary lies of the snake that says, "Everyone sins. Why not sin and be like everyone else?" We can choose to avoid the lies of the snake knowing that there are individuals that are good and practice integrity. We do not need to believe the temporary lies of the snake that envies when individuals worship GOD Almighty. We choose to remain ethical and speak out against corruption especially when it attempts to promote faulty "medications" and "vaccines". We can choose to avoid adverse experimental "vaccines" and expose corruption.

Exposing Deceit and Choosing Integrity

"The ideals and personal goals that had brought me to medicine and then to family practice now called me to investigate, full-time, just how the fundamental mission of American medicine was being undermined-and how we might begin to fix it."- (page 71)

Dr. Abramson described how he had left medical practice in order to describe how the medical field was being affected negatively by the pharmaceutical monopoly (socialism). Dr. Abramson described how he decided to leave a busy medical practice in order to research and expose the corruption and lies of medical journal articles, questionable medical treatments and medications based on deceitful medical journal articles, and how the pharmaceutical companies had essentially attempted to usurp power from researchers and physicians in the 2000s. Dr. Abramson left a busy practice where he had practiced primary care for many decades in order to understand just how bad the state of the medical system was in the 2000s. 

Dr. Abramson discovered that medicine had been corrupted by pharmaceutical companies. He probably left practice after seeing how patients were actually demanding newer, more expensive, and brand name medication because of commercials. Despite the newer medications not being better than generics in some cases (i.e. Vioxx, Celebrex, Actonel, Fosamax, Quinoglute, and Norpace), individuals demanded newer medications instead of listening to Dr. Abramson's medical counseling. Dr. Abramson discovered that commercials for medications were using deception to make it seem that medications were the solution to disease when there are other solutions including exercise, diet counseling, inexpensive generic medications, and preventative care that are actually more effective at improving health or reducing disease. Apparently pharmaceutical companies had used commercials, ads, medical journal articles, continuing medical education classes, and marketing firms in order to sell more newer, brand name, prescribed medications. Dr. Abramson decided to write Overdo$ed America to describe the reality of primary care medicine in the 2000s. The book is impressive because it describes how the truth can allow individuals to not believe the lies of deception. Pharmaceutical companies wanted to sell newer medications that were not better than generics and could have even caused worse disease. Dr. Abramson decided to fight corruption instead of being a part of corruption. Overdo$ed America describes how there are individuals that choose integrity and genuine empathy over corruption and deceit.

Medical Advancements in the Early and Mid 1900s and Decreased Medical Care Quality in the 1980s

Dr. Abramson described how there have been substantial medical advances in the US since the 1900s. There have been great medications and treatments created since the beginning of the 20th century. Dr. Abramson offers constructive criticism concerning how medicine has been commercialized since the 1980s and resulted in the decreased quality of medical care. This is interesting because science is a tool that can be used to help individuals and patients instead of leading to poor health outcomes including heart attacks, strokes, osteoporosis, and falls. There have been great innovations in medicine such as the Polio vaccine that was created in the 1950s by the healthy competition of Dr. Salks and Dr. Sabin that resulted in the decrease of polio cases and lower limb paralysis. The cardiopulmonary bypass machine has helped with surgery in the 1950s. Coronary artery bypass graft surgeries also were successful in the 1960s to remove blocked arteries. 

Dialysis machines created in the 1960s have helped individuals with chronic kidney disease. Hip and knee replacement surgeries allow for increased mobility for patients. There have been medical innovations such as Dr. Debackey's heart surgery inventions that have helped patients survive heart surgery. Izoniazid and streptomycin were antibiotic treatments that helped against bacterial infections. Tagamet was created in 1977 and helped against ulcers. Zantac was later created and approved because it caused less side effects than Tagamet. Prilosec OTC was later approved being better, cheaper, and without the need of a prescription compared to Zantac. Medical innovations and inventions have helped patients. Despite great innovations, medical care quality has decreased since the 1980s due to socialism's attempts to corrupt medical research, the medical supplies industry, and medicine. Socialism has attempted to decrease the quality of medical innovations seen most obviously with the covid experimental "vaccine" in 2019, yet even newer, expensive medications approved in the 1980s (including statins) can cause adverse health effects. Surveys and statistics have described how the quality of medical care in the US has decreased. It is most likely because of corruption and socialism (monopoly "capitalism") The quality of health care has decreased due to the decreased autonomy of physicians since the 1980s seen in how insurance companies have tried to usurp authority, and socialists have fought against H.M.O. plans that were actually suppressing the cost of medical care. H.M.O. plans were actually cost effective in the 1980s and also gave physicians autonomy to practice. Because H.M.O.s were cost effect and not allowing medical costs to balloon to double digits, socialists slandered and lied about cost saving H.M.O.s with great physicians who were preventing a rising cost of medical care while providing great medical care quality in primary care.

"Then I saw an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, in July 2000, claiming that 'the U.S. population does not have anywhere near the best health in the world.'"- (page 44-45)

"The low ranking of Americans' health reported in this article was so disparate from what I had believed that I started to look for other sources of comparitive data to see if this was right. An extensive comparison of the health of the citizens of industrialized countries done by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) confirmed the conclusions presented in Dr. Starfield's article. The United States again ranked poorly, with 18 industrialized countries having greater life expectancy."- (page 45)

"Children born in the United States today can expect to live the equivalent of about 69.3 healthy years of life, while children born in the other 22 industrialized countries can expect an average of 2.5 additional years of healthy life."- (page 46)

Corruption in Medicine in the 1940s

"Estrogen was approved by the FDA in 1942 for the treatment of symptoms associated with menopause." -(page 59)

"Clearly, restricting the use of Estrogen to women with troublesome menopausal symptoms limited its potential market greatly. If more drugs were to be sold, new reasons to take estrogen would have to be found."- (page 60)

"Estrogen became the most frequently prescribed drug in the United States in 1966. It remained one of the most frequently prescribed drugs through 1975."- (page 62)

It is difficult to pinpoint when medicine began to be corrupted. In the 1940s, there was a case of corruption when a corrupt physician, Dr. Wilson, decided to publish a book and an article in a medical journal about how estrogen replacement therapy helped women with menopause and also prevented "breast and gential cancer" in 1962. Combined estrogen therapy was marketed as supposedly helping decrease cervical cancer (1979), heart attacks (1985), strokes, and improved overall health.

"In a 1962 article published in JAMA, Dr. Wilson, a gynecologist, reported the results of a study in which 304 women had been treated with estrogen. Though 18 cancers were predicted over the time that the women had been taking estrogen, none developed."- (page 60)

"Perhaps Wilson's own tongue had been sharpened by the support his foundation was receiving from several drug companies, including the manufacturer of estrogen. In 1965 the Wilson Research Foundation received $34,000 (the equivalent of about $175,000 in 2004 dollars) in contributions from drug companies, enough to cover Wilson's expenses while he was writing his book. In total, Wilson's foundation received $1.3 million from drug companies."- (page 60)

Dr. Wilson had financial ties with pharmaceutical companies (Wyeth-Ayerst) who paid him to promote estrogen replacement therapy. It was noted in the 2000s that estrogen replacement therapy increases cancer incidence in women 8% for every year that they take estrogen. Dr. Wilson did not describe the risk of cancer in the 1940s despite there probably being cases. 

It was not until 2003 and 2004 that new studies described that taking estrogen replacement therapy causes cancer, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and heart attacks. It is possible that estrogen replacement therapy was marketed as an amazing treatment by pharmaceutical companies since the 1940s as population control. Socialists hate that the population size keeps growing and probably falsely marketed estrogen replacement therapy as a good treatment in the 1940s without real scientific evidence. A lying journal article and a lying book were used to promote cancer causing medication to women in the 1940s. It took 60 years to find out that estrogen replacement therapy actually caused adverse health effects. (Covid experimental "vaccines" may not be good vaccinations either despite lies from socialist propaganda.)

It seems that because American industriousness and ethics allowed for innovations in medicine since the 1900s, socialists wanted to prevent such great medical care and advancements starting in 1942 with false lying information published about estrogen replacement therapy. Initially, it was stated that estrogen replacement therapy prevented cancer while actually causing different types of cancer, strokes, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Researchers published medical journal articles in 1975 that described that estrogen replacement therapy caused cancer. Taking estrogen replacement therapy increased the risk of cancer 14 times after seven years of treatment. Yet another lying article stated that adding progestin hormone to estrogen therapy prevented cancer. This was probably to protect sales of estrogen replacement therapy in 1979.

"In December 1975, two articles published in NEJM showed that estrogen therapy increased the risk of cancer of the lining of the uterus (endometrial cancer), up to 14-fold after seven years of treatment. This fear was quashed when, four years later, in 1979, an article published in the Lancet showed that adding another hormone, progestin, for about 10 days each month to estrogen therapy prevented the changes in the lining of the uterus that predisposed to cancer. Several other studies soon confirmed that progestin protected women on estrogen therapy from developing endometrial cancer. Still, HRT had been linked with cancer in the public's mind, and sales plummeted. Only half as many prescriptions for Estrogen were filled in 1980 as had been filled in 1975."-(page 62)

"An aggressive drug rehabilitation program was needed. 'Marketing a disease is the best way to market a drug.'"- (page 62) [Osteoporosis was marketed as a disease that could be improved with estrogen replacement therapy in 1986.]

Since individuals were realizing that estrogen may have caused cancer in 1975, the socialists decided to rehabilitate the medication by marketing osteoporosis as another disease that can be treated with estrogen. Before 1985, few people had heard about osteoporosis being a deadly disease. Osteoporosis was marketed heavily in the 1980s as a dangerous disease for women that could lead to falls and fractures in order to sell estrogen since sales had plummeted in the 1970s. It is possible that the disease was heavily marketed to increase sales of estrogen

"And osteoporosis or thinning of the bones was a perfect disease to market: there are no symptoms until you develop fractures, so no postmenopausal woman could be sure she was safe. And the criteria were set so that one quarter of all women over 65, and more than half over 75, would be diagnosed with the disease if they had bone density tests. There was, however, a lot of work to be done to turn osteoporosis from part of the normal spectrum of skeletal aging into a feared disease."- (page 62)

Osteoporosis may have been marketed in advertising by pharmaceutical companies in medical journal ads, funded medical meetings, and lectures about osteoporosis to make osteoporosis a feared disease and cause estrogen sales to increase again. The pharmaceutical industry did not care about the health of women, and instead chose to market a non-existent disease (osteoporosis is actually normal in the aging process and improves with exercise and nutrition) that caused the prescribing of estrogen therapy. This may have led to numerous cases of heart attacks, strokes, cancers, and Alzheimer's disease to women. This was while it was known in 1975 that estrogen therapy caused cancer. The pharmaceutical companies marketed a drug that was known to cause cancer in 1975

"The next step was to 'educate' the public. In 1985, only 23 percent of women had heard of osteoporosis. But, according to US News and World Report, that changed quickly as the result of the efforts of Burson-Marsteller, the public relations firm hired by Wyeth-Ayerst. The campaign was successful at increasing public concern (some would say unnecessary fear), generating many articles in women's magazines and culminating in National Osteoporosis Week. The National Osteoporosis Foundation was started with drug company support in 1986. Doctors and patients came to fear that undiagnosed osteoporosis would lead to hip bones' suddenly snapping with minimal trauma, though in more than 20 years as a busy family doctor I never saw such a thing."

The pharmaceutical companies caused for estrogen to be seen as a good treatment to osteoporosis by helping create disinformation in ads, National Osteoporosis Week, and even the National Osteoporosis Foundation to educate women on the need to take estrogen. The pharmaceutical companies followed the disinformation about osteoporosis with additional lies that estrogen replacement therapy prevented heart attacks while actually causing heart attacks. The prescribing of estrogen increased to its 1975 high prescription levels in 1992 through lies and deceit and may be responsible for adverse health outcomes further described in randomized controlled studies in 2004.

"Coinciding with the public's "education" about osteoporosis was a 1985 report in NEJM about the positive effect of estrogen on the risk of heart disease. More than 30,000 postmenopausal women participating in the Nurse's Health Study, which followed the women for more than three years, showed that nurses who were currently using estrogen had 70 percent less risk of developing coronary heart disease than women who had not used hormones-a dramatic finding."- (page 63) [Another lying article published in a medical journal about estrogen therapy decreasing heart attack risk after sales had decreased.]

"By 1992, estrogen sales were topping their 1975 peak."

"One out of five postmenopausal women in the United States was taking hormones. The prestigious American College of Physicians issued guidelines to practicing physicians recommending that 'all women... should consider preventive hormone therapy,' and that 10 to 20 years of therapy were recommended for 'maximum benefit'. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology also recommended that all postmenopausal women, barring a medical contraindication like breast cancer, should take HRT for life. Bolstered by the recommendations of these professional organizations, estrogen use increased another 40 percent over the next three years. In 1995 estrogen once again became the most frequently prescribed brand-name drug in the United States. Perhaps the strongest evidence supporting routing HRT was presented in a 1997 article published in NEJM showing that 'mortality among women who use postmenopausal hormones is lower than among nonusers,' again overriding continuing concerns about the link to breast cancer."- (page 64)

After promoting estrogen as a treatment for osteoporosis and prevention of heart attacks, sales of estrogen increased. In 1992, one out of five women were taking estrogen replacement therapy even after studies in 1975 described that estrogen replacement therapy caused cancer. This was due to the advertisements placed in medical journals and lying medical journal articles published in 1979 and 1985. Not only the pharmaceutical companies created the Osteoporosis Foundation to promote estrogen as a treatment for osteoporosis, but they also told the American College of Physicians and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology to promote estrogen replacement therapy. In 1997, another lying article was published in the NEJM stating that women who took estrogen replacement therapy had lower mortality rates. It was not until the year 2000 that truthful journal articles described the risk of increased cancer incidence of women who took estrogen replacement therapy. Instead of helping women be healthier, estrogen replacement therapy caused increased mortality rates in postmenopausal women

"It is amazing that before 1998, not one of the claims supporting the benefits of HRT had been substantiated by large randomized control trials."- (page 66)

"The Nurses' Health Study was the source of the data for the 1997 NEJM article showing a lower mortality rate among women taking HRT. This benefit of HRT lasted for up to five years after woman stopped taking the therapy, but after five years they had a 16 percent increase in their death rate compared with women who had never taken hormones. These contradictory findings deserved a lot more attention that they got at the time. Why did the nurses experience a lower death rate while they were taking hormones, and for five years after they stopped? And why did they go on to experience a significantly higher death rate than women who had never been on HRT?" -(page 66) [1997 NEJM article describing that estrogen replacement therapy lowered mortality rate for five years then increased mortality rate after five years.]

The reasoning to why some women had decreased mortality rates while taking estrogen replacement therapy was that the warning label of estrogen therapy described that women with heart disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes were not supposed to take estrogen therapy. This could mean that women who were healthier and had not started estrogen replacement therapy did not have chronic disease such as heart disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes. 

"Dr. Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, a professor at the University of California, San Diego, points out that while the observational studies of HRT were going on, doctors across the country knew, from estrogen product labeling (included in the Physicians' Desk Reference), that woman with a history of heart disease, high blood pressure, or diabetes should not be treated with estrogen. This would contribute to the spurious findings in the observational studies that women who took hormones had less heart disease. Of course they did: Not only were they the type of women who were going to be healthier; the women taking hormones had already been screened to exclude those with heart disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes. The observational studies that found that estrogen decreased the risk of heart disease had not, according to Dr. Barrett-Connor, adequately adjusted for this." -(page 67)

After they stopped taking estrogen replacement therapy (after five years), they began to develop chronic disease and an increase incidence of mortality rates. This means that estrogen replacement therapy actually caused increased adverse health effects in healthy post-menopausal women taking estrogen replacement therapy for multiple years. However, these findings were not considered significant and estrogen kept being prescribed and sold in pharmacies in the 1990s. Also the studies were observational and not randomized controlled studies. (Observational studies are not the best type of studies because they can have significant bias compared to randomized controlled trials.) The observational studies may have been biased to make it appear that estrogen replacement therapy was beneficial to women (the women did not have chronic disease and were healthier), while not explaining the increased mortality rate after women stopped taking estrogen for multiple years (healthy women then had heart attacks and adverse heart disease).

In the 1990s, the pharmaceutical company Wyeth-Ayerst requested the FDA to approve estrogen for the prevention of heart disease in postmenopausal women. This was when there were only biased observational studies and no randomized controlled trials. The FDA did not approve estrogen treatment for the prevention of heart disease in postmenopausal women in the 1990s. This was because there were no randomized controlled trials demonstrating that estrogen therapy was effective at preventing heart disease. Pharmaceutical companies probably wanted to increase drug sales while disregarding the health risks such medication caused. Estrogen had not been completely studied and researched since the 1940s when the medication was approved for postmenopausal symptoms in postmenopausal women. (There is the need to be skeptical of untested and unresearched medication and "vaccines".)

"In 1998 the results of the first randomized controlled clinical trial of HRT were published. This manufacturer-sponsored study showed that despite significantly lowering LDL (bad) cholesterol and raising HDL (good) cholesterol, HRT increased women's risk of heart disease by 50 percent in the first year. And over the four years of the study, treatment with hormones provided no reduction in the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. In fact, this study showed that the overall death rate was not lower in the women who took hormones; it was slightly higher."

It was noted in 1998 and in the 2000s in medical journal articles that combined estrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy caused worsening health effects such as heart attacks and strokes. It is questionable how estrogen therapy could have been promoted on medical journals, books, magazines, and commercials for so long while actually leading to cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and even dementia. Even in 2000 when a journal article published in JAMA showed an 8 percent increase in breast cancer in women every year that combined estrogen replacement therapy was taken, doctors continued to prescribe combined hormone replacement therapy. In 2001, despite a new journal article describing that combined estrogen replacement therapy causes cancer, estrogen was the third most prescribed medication in the US. That was after journal articles published in 1975, 1998, and 2000 showed significant adverse health effects in postmenopausal women taking combined estrogen replacement therapy. It was not until 2004 that estrogen and combined estrogen replacement therapy was repudiated as a treatment due to multiple scientific studies with randomized control trials. (There is the need for healthy skepticism with new medications and "vaccines".)

"The truth about HRT came out very slowly and was difficult for most doctors to accept. Even after the article appeared in JAMA in 2000 showing the 8 percent per year increase in the risk of breast cancer in women taking combined hormone therapy, most experts continued to recommend, and most doctors continued to prescribe, routine hormone replacement for postmenopausal women. In 2001, estrogen was still the third most frequently prescribed drug in the United States."- (page 68)

"[Article in July 2002] The study found a statistically significant increase (15 percent) in the overall frequency of adverse events in the women taking HRT compared with the women who took a placebo. This translated into about one adverse event for every 100 women who took hormones for five years. The data and safety monitoring board of the study determined that the increased frequency of complications in women who had taken HRT instead of a placebo had 'crossed the designated boundary... of a finding of overall harm,' and that it was no longer ethical to continue the study knowing that the women taking HRT were going to be harmed more than helped." -(page 69)

"The newspapers were full of articles about the government-sponsored Women's Health Initiative study, which had been specifically designed to determine whether routine HRT was beneficial for postmenopausal women. The 16,000 women in the study had been randomly assigned to take either (estrogen and progestin) HRT or placebo. The study had been scheduled to run through 2005, but the women received letters instructing them to stop taking the study medication because the risk (increase in breast cancer, heart attack, stroke, and blood clots) associated with combined HRT had been found to be significantly greater than the benefit (decrease in hip fractures and colon cancers). The study found a statistically significant increase (15 percent) in the overall frequency of adverse events in the women taking HRT compared with the women who took a placebo." -(page 69)

"In May 2003 more results from the Women's Health Initiative were published showing that combined HRT not only did not prevent Alzheimer's disease, but actually doubled the risk of developing dementia (primarily Alzheimer's disease) in women aged 65 and older, causing about 1 additional case of dementia for every 100 women treated with HRT for five years." 

"[Another study with sample size of 1 million described increased cancer in the women taking combined estrogen replacement therapy.] The results showed that women who were currently taking hormones had a 66 percent higher chance of getting breast cancer (30 percent for those taking only estrogen, and 100 percent for those taking both estrogen and progestin) than the women who were not taking hormones. The women taking hormones were also significantly more likely to die of breast cancer than the women not taking hormones. To put the risk into perspective, the researchers calculated that there had been about 20,000 extra cases of breast cancer caused by HRT in the United Kingdom over the previous 10 years. Based on the difference of population size alone, even at the same rate of hormone use, there would have been an extra 94,000 cases of breast cancer in the United States in the previous 10 years as a result of women taking HRT. The total number of American women who developed breast cancer because of taking HRT was likely to be much higher than this, though, because women in the United States were about four times more likely to take HRT than women in the United Kingdom."- (page 70)

It was concluded through multiple research articles published in medical journals in the 2000s that women who took HRT for more than five years developed significant adverse health effects. Such adverse health effects included breast cancer, heart attack, strokes, dementia and Alzheimer's disease, blood clots, and possibly even other health complications including cardiac problems. It is stated that probably 94,000 women in the US were affected in ten years yet estrogen replacement therapy had been approved and prescribed since the 1940s. It is possible that a lot more women were affected due to the use of estrogen replacement therapy and combined replacement therapy. This describes how the pharmaceutical companies did not fully research the effects of estrogen therapy for postmenopausal women in 1940. It took 60 years later to prove that the increase of cancer cases in women was due to estrogen replacement therapy. There is the need to be skeptical of new medications and "vaccines".

 "...Starting in the early 1980s, progestins where added to estrogen to reduce the risk of uterine cancer in women who had not had a hysterectomy. The risk of uterine cancer was reduced to near zero, but nobody evaluated the overall effect of adding progestin to routine HRT. The Million Women Study confirmed that taking estrogen without progestin caused 10 extra uterine cancers and 5 extra breast cancers, a total of 15 extra cancers per 1000 women over 10 years. Adding progestin did, in fact, eliminate the risk of uterine cancer but caused an extra 19 breast cancers per 1000 women over 10 years. In other words, the problem of uterine cancer was 'solved' by adding a drug that increased a woman's risk of getting other types of cancer."- (page 70)

Dr. Abramson described how progestin was added to estrogen replacement therapy in order to prevent uterine cancer in postmenopausal women. The treatment was approved yet was not completely researched. It was not until the 2000s that randomized controlled trials described that progestin did not in fact prevent cancer. Progestin prevented uterine cancer yet resulted in additional types of cancer. The pharmaceutical industry advertised combined estrogen therapy as a good treatment against cancer while actually causing different types of cancer. A study conducted in the 2000s described how progestin prevented 15 cases of uterine cancer while adding 19 cases of other types of cancer. This describes that estrogen and progestin combined hormone replacement therapy caused more cancers than estrogen therapy alone. This was after combined estrogen replacement therapy with progestin was approved in 1980. Ethical researchers told participants of the study to stop taking combined estrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy because it caused cancer and other adverse health effects. It was not until the 2000s that the truth about estrogen and progestin replacement therapy was told and estrogen therapy was no longer favored as a treatment for menopausal symptoms.

"The estrogen-only part of the Women's Health Initiative Study was ended prematurely, in February 2004. Researchers concluded that after almost seven years, the women taking estrogen had more strokes and fewer broken hips than the women taking placebos. The most important finding was that there was no overall benefit to taking estrogen and that, therefore, it 'should not be recommended for chronic disease prevention in postmenopausal women.'"- (page 70)

The Women's Health Initiative Study was ended prematurely in February 2004 because the findings noted that estrogen therapy caused strokes to postmenopausal women. The researchers published their findings and allowed for the truth on estrogen replacement therapy to be known. The most interesting and significant finding was that taking estrogen replacement therapy showed no overall benefit and that it should not be recommended for chronic disease prevention in postmenopausal women. This was when estrogen replacement therapy was said to prevent postmenopausal symptoms in the 1940s without having significant adverse health effects. Estrogen was touted as helping combat osteoporosis and heart disease in the 1980s without randomized controlled trials. The treatment showed no overall benefit to health after randomized controlled trials were done in the 2000s. This describes the need to see science as a tool and not as a religion. Science can be used for good, yet can also be misutilized by unethical scientists. We should keep healthy skepticism against pseudo-science, lies, deceit, and bad medicine. The estrogen replacement therapy treatment was approved since the 1940s without knowing how the medication actually affected individuals until the 2000s

"Twenty million American women have taken HRT not only to relieve symptoms such as hot flashes... but also believing that hormones would protect their hearts, decrease Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, prevent tooth loss and diabetes, strengthen their bones... improve the quality of their lives, and increase their longevity... Despite this, they unwittingly exposed themselves to increased risks of breast cancer, heart attack, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and blood clots."

"In the end, the 26 percent increase in the risk of breast cancer caused by HRT found in the Women's Health Initiative study was deemed by the National Institutes of Health 'too high a price to pay, even if there was a heart benefit.' The risk had been known a decade earlier, when the American College of Physicians made its recommendation that all women without unusual risk should consider taking HRT, but was not of enough concern at the time to invoke the principle 'First do no harm.' Far more than 100,000 unnecessary cases of breast cancer resulted."- (page 71)

"The important lessons from this chapter of American medical history will be lost if we simply attribute the debacle of routine HRT for healthy postmenopausal women to the vagaries of medical progess. Failure to understand how this mistake occurred commits us (doctors and patients alike) to being naïvely swept up by each new cycle of exaggerated claims about the effectiveness and safety of ever more expensive medical therapies- that is, until even newer 'medical knowledge' is produced that supports even costlier drugs. The fundamental lesson to be learned from the HRT debacle is that therapeutic decisions must be based on solid and unbiased scientific evidence. The trend, however, is going in exactly the opposite direction.'"- (page 71)

Dr. Abramson describes that there is a lesson to learn from the prescription of HRT since the 1940s that caused cancer, strokes, heart attacks, falls, and severe disease to women. We can learn that there is the need for healthy skepticism against newer "medication" and "vaccines" that may have been created in haste and attempted to lead to adverse health conditions. There is the need to study the effects of new "vaccines" and "medications" prior to deciding to take said newer "vaccinations" and "medications". There is the need to be skeptical of newer "medical knowledge" that may be false and written with the intention to lead to the taking of bad "medication" and "vaccines". We can persevere without covid "vaccines".

Increased Corruption in the 1980s in Medicine

It seems that the 1980s was when medicine began to be increasingly corrupted by financial ties with big pharma and researchers from medical journal articles (newer statins). Cost saving H.M.O.'s and great primary care physicians were under attack from the socialist media for preventing the rising cost of medical care while also preventing chronic disease in patients

Great primary care and cost saving insurance H.M.O.'s were preventing medical costs from increasing substantially. Socialists despised that Americans were getting affordable quality care and began to state lies about how doctor visits were being rushed and that cost saving H.M.O.'s were not good. This led to increased medical costs with inflation of prices in the double digits. Quality of care also decreased because counseling the patient on preventative medicine was not remunerated economically while patient visit times were decreased. While lifestyle changes such as exercise, nutrition counseling, and smoking cessation have led to healthier lives without the need of newer, expensive, and brand name medication, patient counseling was not looked upon favorably by socialists (prevention of chronic diseases). This would describe why the patient doctor visit times were significantly decreased from an hour or thirty minutes prior to 1980s to fifteen minutes. (There was a psychiatrist that was let go for spending more than fifteen minutes per visit with her patients while being an amazing psychiatrist in the 2010s).

H.M.O. Plans and Managed Care Plans Caused Medical Costs to Decrease While Providing Great Medical Care

"The period of the late 1980s and early 1990s was the golden era of HMOs and managed care plans. They appeared to have solved the problem of rising health insurance costs..."-(page 78)

"Health care spending budgets that would have been unacceptable coming from the government were created by competing independent health plans, which employers choosing which to offer and employees usually (but not always) given a choice of several from which to choose... This market-based approach successfully tamed the double-digit percentage increases in health insurance premiums of the late 1980s and early 1990s, bringing the annual rate of increase down from a peak of 18 percent in 1989 to less than 2 percent by 1996."

Dr. Abramson described how competing HMO plans in the 1980s allowed for decreased medical costs and great quality of care. HMO insurance plans worked with employers to provide inexpensive health insurance plans while also providing great medical quality working with primary care physicians. Dr. Abramsondescribed how his work with HMO plans helped patients. Dr. Abramson described how preventative care allowed for better health outcomes, decreased hospitalizations and emergency room visits, and inexpensive routine check ups and vaccination visits that improved the health of communities in many cities in the United States. It is probable that because the insurance companies had to compete with other insurance companies through real capitalism, socialists were envious

True competition allows for the better insurance companies to get more patients while expensive and ineffective insurance companies do not get customers. Because individuals were getting great healthcare at reduced costs in the 1980s, socialists began to slander and speak lies about great HMOs. A statistic stated that the annual rate of increase of health insurance premiums fell from 18 percent in 1989 to less than 2 percent in 1996. The cost of health insurance premiums fell 16 percent which may have caused envy from socialists. Since medical care costs had decreased signicantly with improved outcomes for patients and less hospitalizations with chronic disease, socialists attacked HMO cost saving plans. Socialists did not want healthier individuals and a decreased cost to great medical care. HMO plans began to be the major health care plans in the 1980s and 1990s until socialists slandered and lied about rushed doctor visits in the television (medical journal studies described how patient visits from HMO plans were not rushed and actually within average patient visit times. This is while socialists actually have caused for patient doctor visit times to decrease significantly from the early 1980s from an hour or half an hour to fifteen minutes.) Dr. Abramson described how it was probable that the pharmaceutical monopoly, medical equipment industries, and hospital industries may have had decreased financial revenues that led to negative coverage of HMO plans. Socialists probably did not care about improved health outcomes and actually cared about financial revenues. HMO plans were attacked and slandered because they prevented medical costs from increasing significantly each year.

Dr. Abramson Described How H.M.O. Plans Were Beneficial and Cost Effective

"Almost all of my patients welcomed the new plans. The broader insurance coverage meant that they no longer had to pay for their office visits or go through a lot of paperwork to collect from their indemnity insurance. And because family doctors take care of a broader range of problems than other primary care physicians, most of my patients already expected to discuss most of their medical problems with me before going to a specialist anyway. Besides the additional administrative burden of processing referrals to specialists, the added responsibility of functioning as the medical gatekeeper had little impact on my practice. Despite the discounted fees, I preferred taking care of my patients on the new insurance plans. I could provide better care because patients were willing to come in for routine exams and follow-up visits. Money was removed as an impediment to the doctor-patient relation. True, the low co-pay for office visits contributed to some nonessential patient-generated visits, but most of these served to increase the patients' trust and enhanced my ability to provide good care."- (page 79)


Dr. Abramson described that while being a family practice physician, he saw that H.M.O. plans were good. The H.M.O. plans helped individuals obtain cost effective medical treatment that was inexpensive and of great quality. H.M.O. plans along with Medicare were the two medical plans most seen in the 1980s. Dr. Abramson described that he saw that the health management plans were actually decreasing the cost of medical care while providing good health outcomes for patients and communities. It was noted that preventative medicine prevented individuals from getting chronic disease, being hospitalized, and from visiting the emergency department. Because all of that caused decreased medical costs, socialists probably envied H.M.O. plans. 

Dr. Abramson described that patients actually benefitted from the insurance plans and were grateful for the insurance plans. Patients were able to have inexpensive insurance that decreased medical costs and also resulted in a healthier lifestyle. Dr. Abramson described that the insurance plans allowed patients to discuss and speak about their medical concerns with ease since medical costs were decreased and the medical care received was of great quality and affordable. Socialists probably hated H.M.O. plans and slandered the insurance plans causing an increase of medical spending similar to Medicare in the 1960s. Apparently, socialists are stingy and also envied that Americans could have great inexpensive medical care quality in the 1980s and 1990s. This was after increasing the costs of medical care in Medicare in the 1960s. That is why socialism and monopoly "capitalism" need to be repudiated.

"The stage could not have been set more perfectly for prescription drug advertising to become a major force in American medicine. And so it did. In 1991 the drug companies spent a paltry $55 million on advertising drugs directly to consumers. Over the next 11 years, this increased to more than 50-fold to over $3 billion in 2003. The ads appeal to viewers as independent decision makers-capable of forming their own opinions about which drugs they need- and resonate with the growing concerns that HMOs and managed care plans tend to withhold the best care to save money."- (page 80)

Pharmaceutical companies spent on ads to get consumers to buy newer, expensive, brand name medication and also speak negatively on HMOs and managed care plans (lying about cost saving insurance). The ads were marketed to convince consumers to request brand name medications (that may not have been better than generics and even caused worse disease.) We can learn that we should not believe lies of commercials and ads that speak deception. Necessary items are never on commercials and ads. 

"Largely freed of concerns about out-of-pocket costs, enticed by advertisement and media coverage of developments in medicine, and emboldened by a sense of autonomy, patients began requesting, and then demanding, specific tests, drugs, and procedures. Indeed, it became nearly impossible to convince many patients that more medical care was not necessarily better."- (page 80

Dr. Abramson described how advertisements on television were deceptive and leading patients to request and demand newer, brand name medication that may have caused serious adverse health effects. Dr. Abramson did not prescribe more expensive medication that could have led to adverse health outcomes. Because patients saw advertisements, they began to demand specific newer medication. Dr. Abramson may have left practice because he preferred to not prescribe bad medication that may cause adverse health effects. Advertisements from pharmaceutical companies attempted to promote brand name medications, speak negativity about HMO plans, disrupt the doctor patient relationship by telling patients to request "better" medication, and spoke lies. Dr. Abramson described how some patients believed the lying ads and began demanding medications like Vioxx and Celebrex which actually cause strokes and adverse health outcomes. Dr. Abramson decided to not be a part of corruption and left family practice to write Overdo$ed America.

Pharmaceutical Companies Paid For Lying Advertisement to Strain the Doctor-Patient Relationship

"Indeed, it became nearly impossible to convince my patients that more medical care was not necessarily better. Rather than adopting lifestyle changes that could prevent illnesses, many people began to believe that the latest "medical breakthroughs" were all that was needed to keep them healthy. Ethicist Daniel Callahan in his book False Hopes sums this up beautifully: "The market sells dreams and hopes as well as things."- (page 80)

The pharmaceutical companies paid to make lying advertisements about how newer, expensive, brand name medications were better than generics when they caused severe healh problems. Dr. Abramson described how even after counseling patients on the truth of false advertisements by the pharmaceutical companies, there were patients that still demanded faulty medications to be prescribed. The pharmaceutical companies were actively trying to strain the doctor-patient relationship through false advertisement. The false advertisements were made with the intention to lead patients to request and then demand medication that may have been harmful to their health. Instead a healthy lifestyle with adequate nutrition and exercise is better than brand name expensive medication that can cause adverse health effects. 

Dr. Abramson described how pharmaceutical companies were trying to get patients to get doctors to prescribe expensive medication based on lies, deception, and falsehoods. The commercials were false and attempted to make it seem that brand name medications would solve their medical problems when nutrition and exercise were better options. Dr. Abramson describes how false advertisement sells unneeded products based on lies and deceit. We should skip the false advertisements and have healthy skepticism. (I have never seen commercials for generic medications. Also never seen commercials for vitamins and minerals during the covid "pandemic", but there were multiple commercials for experimental covid "vaccines".)

Dr. Abramson Described How the Pharmaceutical Company Used False Advertisements to Cause Conflict Between the Doctor-Patient Relationship

"To exactly the same extent that a person is seduced by the false hopes and dreams offered by the medical industry's marketing efforts, the ability to trust his or her doctor, especially a primary care doctor, is eroded."- (page 80)

Dr. Abramson described how false advertisement led to the straining of the doctor patient relationship in the 1990s and 2000s. The pharmaceutical companies were probably looking to cause conflict between patients and physicians. Socialists do not like harmony and cooperation between patients and doctors. Socialists tried to decrease the amount of time of doctor visits since the 1980s for primary care doctor visits. Then advertisements tried to tell patients to tell their doctors to prescribe the medications on the advertisements. This was when some medications were not good and caused adverse health effects

Dr. Abramson tried to reason and counsel patients on not believing the deceit of false advertisement especially with bad medications (Vioxx and Celebrex). Patients began demanding the medications on advertisement when they may have caused adverse health effects. Dr. Abramson decided to not prescribe such medications. Dr. Abramson described how false advertisement from pharmaceutical companies may have also contributed to the doctor patient relationship being affected in a negative manner. There were patients who were angry when their med requests were not granted and even demanded faulty medications. Dr. Abramson decided against prescribing bad medication and left practice in the 2000s.

HMO's and Managed Care Plans Were Attacked By the Media When They Were Suppressing Price Inflation in the 1990s

"It wasn't long, however, before the enthusiasm about HMOs and managed care plans started to wane. News stories about HMOs unreasonably withholding care became a dominant theme, and by 1997, critical stories were outnumbering positive ones by a seven-to-one margin. The health insurance industry added grist to the mill by imposing one-day obstetric hospitalizations for normal deliveries, selectively contracting with doctors so that long-standing doctor-patient relationships were disrupted, and trying to save money by avoiding high-cost patients like those with HIV/AIDS. Patients' rights legislation emerged as a major political issue as the public focused on restricted access to care. The public's esteem for managed care companies plummeted. In 1997, 51 percent of those surveyed said that managed care companies were serving patients well; that figure was down to 29 percent just four years later."- (page 81)

Dr. Abramson described how the media began to speak negativity about HMO plans and managed care plans that were preventing price inflation in medical care. Because HMOs were cost effective and provided great care, socialists disdained that medical care costs were not increasing. Socialists had already increased the price of medical care in the 1960s by increasing the fees of hospitals and doctors since Medicare was paying for elderly patient's medical care. Socialists envied that the government was paying for the medical care of the elderly and made hospitals and doctors raise their fees while at the same time blaming Medicare for the rising costs of medical care. In the 1990s, HMOs were decreasing the cost of medical care and prevented price inflation. HMOs were good insurances, yet socialists envied that medical prices were not increasing each year.

The media then attacked HMOs with negative news stories about how HMOs were withholding care, the quality of care worsening under HMOs, patient visits were being rushed, and physicians denying patient requests for referrals and specialists. Dr. Abramson described how there were seven negative stories for every one positive story of HMOs in the media in 1997. This was probably done with the intention to lead individuals to believe that HMOs were bad. The reason for the negative coverage was because HMOs were offering great medical care and preventing price inflation. The negative media coverage caused insurances to make medical decisions that increased the price of medicine leading to price inflation and arbitrariness. Insurances added a one day hospitalization stay to normal deliveries in addition to disrupting patient doctor relationships. High risk patients such as HIV and AIDS patients were dropped to save costs paying for high cost anti retrovirals. (Even idolatrous socialists hate LGBT homosexuals despite socialists being LGBT homosexuals. We hate sin and not the individual.) This was blamed on the insurances when it was the socialists who were attempting to prevent cost saving by leading to price inflation. Socialists wanted the prices of medical care to inflate every year since that leads to profits for socialists. HMOs were an obstacle to price inflation and were slandered and attacked on the media. Insurance companies increased costs and price inflation from 2 percent in 1996 to 13.9 percent in 2003 every year. Idolatrous socialists envied elderly patients in 1965 for obtaining Medicare, patients with physical discapacities in 1965 for obtaining Medicaid, and patients with HMO insurance in the 1990s for saving costs on great medical care. There is bad and then there is socialism. Socialists are greedy, stingy, envious, covetous, bitter, fake, and still want to appear as if they "help the working class and patients". The increase of medical care prices in the United States is all due to socialism and greedy, stingy socialists. We should avoid the lies of the socialists and lying media.

Stingy and Greedy Socialists Disdained Competition Between Insurance Companies That Kept Medical Costs Down

"Initial cost savings had come fairly easily. Doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers had little choice but to accept discounted fees in order to be included in the newly formed networks of healthcare providers; otherwise they risked losing access to their patients. These so called volume discounts controlled prices during the transition to managed care, but the apparent solution was short lived. Once the discounts had been factored in, this apparently exquisite solution to controlling costs- local health budgets set by the marketplace instead of the government- became the problem."- (page 81)

Dr. Abramson described that the villification of the media against cost saving HMO insurances may have been due to the prevention of health care cost inflation. Socialists saw that HMO insurances decreased medical costs and gave great medical care. Socialists were envious of cost inflation prevention and slandered competitive insurance companies. The insurance companies were efficient, ethical, and cost effective while decreasing costs. This was because Bastiat capitalism was used instead of monopoly "capitalism". Socialists hate true capitalism styled after Frederic Bastiat and attempt to oppose true competition. HMO and managed care insurances in the 1990s under an impressive Democrat economy, allowed for cost savings and great medical care to be given to patients. Insurance companies competed in the marketplace and caused for medical costs to decrease. Insurance companies had to give good medical care in order to gain patients while bad medical care from bad insurance companies caused patients to choose the better insurance. In a competitive capitalist marketplace, patients obtain cheaper insurance and medical care while receiving great medical care. Socialists hate and envy true competition and also great medical care because it is based on merit. Socialism disdains great medical care and also low prices for insurances and medical care. This actually occurred in the 1990s. Because patients were being benefitted and profits to socialists were decreased based on preventing price inflation, socialists attacked and lied about great insurance companies on the media with negative news stories that outnumbered positive news stories. 

The real problem to socialists was cost controls on medical care based on local health care budgets set by the market place and not by the government. Socialists envied that great insurance companies had more patients based on merit and also that the cost of medicine had decreased significantly while price inflation was held down. Socialists then caused price inflation to rise each year starting in 2003 leading to expensive and also not so great medicine (this is concerning primary care since bad medication from big pharma was being prescribed that caused strokes, heart attacks, GI bleeds, and falls, office visit times were decreased, and litigation was causing the doctor patient relationship to be adversarial instead of cooperative). This led to increased prices and decreased quality of care. All of this because socialists disdained cheap, inexpensive, competitive, and amazing insurances. The problem was socialism and socialists who hate the utilization of resources with responsibility and effectiveness. Socialists hated that the government paid for Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 and attempted to slander and lie about how Medicare caused price inflation in medical care when it was socialists who caused price increases. Almost forty years later, and the same socialists or monopoly "capitalists" decided to increase medical prices by slandering and lying about HMOs and managed care plans. This describes why medical costs in the United States have increased significantly. Socialists hate true competition, cost saving, thriftness, and responsibility. We can avoid socialism and fake "capitalism" styled after non compete and prefer Bastiat capitalism. We should avoid socialists who make everything worse for everyone seeing how socialists caused cheap and inexpensive medical care in the 1990s to become expensive  in the 2000s. In the 2020s, socialists are responsible for the experimental covid "vaccines" that caused strokes and blood clots.

Socialists Slandered HMOs and Managed Care Plans Because of Cost Savings

"When there were no more cost savings to be squeezed out of the fees paid to health care providers, HMOs and managed care companies had only one avenue open: they had to start to really 'manage' care, that is, control costs by eliminating unnecessary or wasteful care. (Of course, cutting down on advertising, executive salaries, and profits would have helped, too.)"- (page 81)

Dr. Abramson described how the insurance companies had lowered the cost of medical care and also allowed for the management of price inflation. This led to unnecessary and wasteful care to be eliminated. This meant that insurance companies and providers in primary care were helping contain costs of medical care. Medical care inflation was at 2% in the 1990s each year yet grew to almost 14% in 2003 each year once the slander and lies occurred against price saving insurance companies. Socialists saw that great insurance companies and great physicians were reducing the cost of medicine. 

Because medical costs were decreased, socialists wanted more revenues and did not like that health care was inexpensive and effective. Since medicine was being practiced efficiently and effectively and reducing costs, socialists turned to lying and slander. Socialists instead of lowering executive salaries or decreasing advertisements decided to lie about insurance companies not being good for patients. 59% of people expressed negative feelings about HMOs and managed care in general after lying propaganda, yet 69% actually were satisfied by the medical care they were receiving by HMOs and managed care plans. It is probable that marxist socialists disdained great, low cost medical care

Socialists Caused Public Disgruntlements To Prevent Great Insurance Companies From Reducing Medical Price Inflation

"Each of the constituencies of this complex system felt threatened by the limitation of medical expenditures. Though I have no proof, I strongly suspect that the parties that had the most to lose financially-the drug, medical equipment, and hospital industries; and the specialty care doctors-played the biggest role in fanning the flames of public disgruntlement. When public opinion turned so strongly against the measures to control health care costs, the insurance companies had no choice but to loosen their management of care. Yearly increases in health insurance premiums once again started to balloon out of control, rising steadily from a low 2 percent annual increase in 1996 to 13.9 percent in 2003."

The HMOs and managed care companies were being opposed by socialists because of price inflation controlled by cheap prices and great medical care created through competition between the private market. Socialists hate healthy competition in the economy that results in inexpensive and great medical care. Socialists actually prefer bureaucracy and red tape that is monopoly "capitalism". This form of socialism leads to increased prices and not the best healthcare. Socialists in the pharmaceutical monopolies probably opposed great inexpensive insurance companies since price inflation was being prevented. 

The pharmaceutical industry probably got the hospital industry, medical equipment industry, and specialist doctors to foment negativity against great insurance companies so that insurance companies would stop containing price inflation and allow increases in medical care prices. This actually occurred and price inflation in 2003 led to expensive medical care that decreased in quality due to socialism and non-compete. Great insurance companies were made to manage medical care in a less efficient manner that allowed prices to keep increasing significantly each year. The socialists hated price containment and wanted price inflation to benefit the pharmaceutical industry profits for bad medication (Vioxx and Celebrex) and also cause negative outcomes for patients while misutilizing Medicare prescription coverage in the 2000s. Socialists caused medicine to be less inexpensive and not so good seeing the types of meds that were being produced (Actonel and Fosamax), advertised on medical journals, and then recalled by the pharmaceutical companies once bad medications were causing adverse health effects. This explains part of why medicine had changed negatively in the 2000s. The pharmaceutical monopoly probably did not want individuals to get great medical care at cheap prices and attacked insurance companies with lies. This describes how the pharmaceutical companies had attempted to change medicine from an ethical field into a monopoly industry in the 2000s. This was to negatively affect the great economy that was existing in the 1990s because of the Democrats who were classical liberals and not marxists. Socialists wanted to prevent a great economy in the 2000s, increase the price of medical care through non-compete socialism, advertise, approve, and prescribe bad medication, and increase profits for the pharmaceutical monopoly that created covid experimental "vaccines".

The Importance of Primary Care

"Comparisons both within the United States and between countries show that access to comprehensive, family-oriented primary care service is the distinguishing characteristic of health care systems that are both effective at producing good health and efficient at controlling costs."

Dr. Abramson described how primary care physicians are important at providing great care and also reducing the cost of medical care. Dr. Abramson described how countries with great medical care have half of their physicians being primary care physicians. The United States has had less primary care physicians since 1965 when the number of primary care physicians and specialists were the same. Only 31% of physicians are primary care physicians. Since the 2000s, only 22% of medical students wanted to go into primary care. The shortage of primary care physicians may have led to increased medical costs in medical care and also increase of chronic diseases.

(02/24/2026 Socialists are slowing down the internet and hindering.)

"In 1965 there were as many primary care doctors as specialists in the United States. Since then, the ratio of primary care doctors to the U.S. population has remained about the same, while the ratio of specialists has more than doubled."- (page 83)

The amount of primary care doctors in the US has decreased since the 1960s. The percentage fell from 50% to 31% due to primary care being seen as a field that did not offer monetary remuneration compared to specialty fields. Less students wanted to go into primary care because the medical field encouraged high paying specialties over primary care. Specialties were paid almost double the amount that primary care physicians were paid each year. Primary care physicians also have less free time working more hours. Students were also encouraged into specialty practice because of the high debt of medical school. This would explain why students did not want to go into primary care. 3 out of 1000 students in a survey described that they were encouraged to go into primary care. This describes how the medical field had encouraged students into specialty care over primary care in the past 40 years. It is unknown whether socialists did this intentionally to decrease the amount of primary care physicians. With less primary care physicians in the medical industry, there is more chronic disease. It may be that socialists attempted to decrease the number of primary care physicians while increasing the number of specialists. Specialists are also needed, yet primary care physicians are important at preventing chronic disease and counseling about preventative medicine. This has also contributed to the increase cost of medical care over the years. 

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Also Increased the Price of Medical Care

"In addition to the growing imbalance between primary care doctors and specialists, the ever-present threat of malpractice litigation is also increasing the cost of American medical care.
 This threat may provide some protection to patients and allow recourse for substandard care, but the justice meted out is inconsistent. In a New York times op-ed piece, Philip K. Howard, author of the Collapse of the Common Good: How America's Lawsuit Culture Undermines Our Freedom, commented that most of the doctors who do commit malpractice are not sued, and most of the lawsuits brought against doctors are about situations in which malpractice was not committed. Nonetheless, the current medical malpractice system consistently distorts our medical care."- (page 84)

Dr. Abramson described how in addition to a decreased amount of primary care physicians and insurance companies being prevented from containing costs, increased litigation in medicine caused medical care prices to increase. Dr. Abramson described how litigation had increased in the late 1990s and early 2000s. This was probably due to socialists who decreased patient doctor visit times compared to the past. Doctor patient visits were decreased to fifteen minutes. Commercials were used to tell patients to request from physicians newer and more expensive medication. Dr. Abramson described that patients sometimes demanded prescribed medications that were on commercials despite not needing them. This also led to hostilities and an adversarial doctor patient relationship. 

Due to these changes and decreased patient doctor visit times, increased cases of litigation occured in medicine. While there were cases when bad medicine was practiced, the adversarial relationship between doctor and patients led to more litigation. This led to doctors ordering unnecessary tests, labs, and meds in order to prevent litigation. This also could have led to increased medical costs in the medical field. An author of a book on the subject, Philip K. Howard, described how most of the doctors that commit malpractice are not sued while most lawsuits brought against doctors are about situations in which malpractice was not committed. This means that medicine had been changed so that patients and doctors were adversarial to each other instead of cooperative with one another. This was probably done by socialists in order to increase the costs of medicine and also cause a negative perception of empathy and understanding

Dr. Abramson Described How Increased Litigation in Medicine Caused Doctors to Leave Medicine and Increased the Cost of Medical Care

Dr. Abramson described how increased litigation in medicine caused for medical care to also increase in costs. Medical care prices were increasing due to the attacks of socialists against the HMOs and managed care plans. Socialists caused medical prices to increase substantially almost 14% in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Another cause of price increases was the increase of litigation in medical care. It is possible that the socialists were also responsible for increased medical prices due to increased litigation. The increase of litigation cases caused medical prices to increase because physicians ordered more tests to prevent a negative interaction with hostile patients that could have led to litigation. The cost of medical malpractice insurance also went up due to the increase use of litigation. This may have been due to socialists who wanted the doctor patient relationship to be adversarial instead of co-operative. 

Even physicians left medical practice because of high medical malpractice insurance costs. The costs of medical malpractice insurance increased substantially in the 2000s. Primary care physicians left private practice and instead chose to change professions because of high medical malpractice costs and an adversarial doctor patient relationship in the 2000s. Physicians with multiple years of experience left private practice because of the litigation in medicine and high medical malpractice costs. Others practiced without insurance. This contributed to the high costs of medical care in the 2000s. The socialists and socialism are the reason that medicine in the US has substantially increased in pricing due to preventing HMOs and managed care plans from controlling price inflation, an adversarial doctor patient relationship fomented by pharmaceutical drug advertisement (telling patients to request newer, brand name medication) and 15 minute doctor patient visits, increased litigation in medicine, and increased costs of medical malpractice.  

Why Medical Care Quality in the US Has Decreased Despite Higher Costs?

Dr. Abramson described that since 2004 the cost of medical care in the United States has increased significantly while the quality has not improved. It has been noted that the quality of care in the US has decreased because of big pharma's influence on primary care, changes in the doctor-patient relationship (decrease of time in doctor visits), and also because of the commercialization of medicine (despite no universal healthcare). On the measure of performance on the level of health, the US was number 72 in the world. 

"Despite the poor performance of the American health care system, our healthcare costs are simply staggering. In 2004, health expenditures in the United States are projected to exceed $6,100 for every man, woman, and child. How does this compare with other countries? The United States spends more than twice as much per person on health care as the other industrialized nations. Even taking into account our higher per person gross domestic product, the United States spends 42 percent more on healthcare per person than would be expected, given spending in healthcare in the other OECD nations. The excess spending on health care in the United States is like a yearly tax of more than $1,800 on every American citizen. (And still the United States is the only industrialized country that does not provide universal health insurance, leaving more than 43 million Americans uninsured.)"- (page 46)

The United States has increased spending in health care, yet the quality of the medical care has decreased according to surveys and statistics. Most of this is due to many factors dealing with envy and socialism. It is known that primary care medicine is vital and indispensible for a nation's good health. Nations with good and excellent health care have multiple primary care physicians. Almost 50% of physicians in countries with excellent healthcare are primary care physicians and not specialists (compared to less than 30% in the US). In the United States, there are more specialists than primary care doctors since socialist medical mentality has disdained primary care for its long hours, decreased pay, and the manner that primary care actually allows for preventative medicine to be practiced. Preventative medicine prevents chronic disease from becoming worse disease. (Specialists are still needed in countries with good healthcare, yet primary care physicians are actually given importance, respect, and are seen with admiration for preventing chronic disease through the patient-doctor visit.) The socialists in the US since the 1980s have attempted to portray primary care as "insignificant", low paying, too much work, and inane while giving positive support of other specialties. Younger doctors since the 1980s were discouraged from being primary care physicians while being led to high paying specialties creating a limited amount of primary care physicians. Less primary care physicians means less preventative care. Less preventative care means more chronic diseases. More chronic diseases means more spending on health care.) Do socialists prefer instructing preventative care or allowing for less preventative care and more chronic disease? Socialists prefer chronic disease and disdain preventative care. That is why primary care has been disdained by socialists in the US since the 1980s

There is also the manner that medicine is a practice that has increased litigation also since the 1980s. This is because socialists want patients and doctors to be hostile to each other instead of being partners in the improvement of health. Socialists wanted patients and doctors to be in conflict instead of working together. This has been seen in how litigation increased in the medical field causing doctors to order unnecessary testing based on patient requests or in order to prevent a negative patient visit to prevent litigation (this makes sense of why unnecessary tests and treatments have caused for medicine to increase in costs. Can not blame the physicians for this and rather can blame socialism (monopoly "capitalism"). The socialists probably caused for litigation to be seen in medicine after causing the decreased patient visit times from 30 minute to an hour visits prior to 1980 to 15 minutes.) Instead of only ordering needed tests and treatment, doctors had to order unnecessary tests in order to prevent litigation rather than not order tests. Litigation in medicine is from socialism. (Yet at the same time in 2019, pharmaceutical companies did not want individuals to litigate against pharmacutical companies and faulty covid experimental "vaccines".)

Another cause of increased spending in medicine while causing decreased quality of care has been the manner that pharmaceutical medications have been seen as the solution to everything. Instead, preventative care is more important to preventing disease. Expensive, newer, and brand name medication has caused increased costs in medical care. Part of the high cost of medicine is due to expensive medication that is not better than generics. Medicare also helped pharmaceutical companies prescribe newer and more expensive medication instead of generics in the 2000s. Dr. Abramson described how some of the dangerous medications (Pravachol, Lipitor, Vioxx, Celebrex, Actonel, and Fosamax) were among the most prescribed to medicare recipients instead of generic medication. Even tax payers had to pitch in to pay for expensive bad meds in the 2000s. The newer and more expensive bad medications may have also caused strokes, heart attacks, osteoporosis, and falls that also increased medical costs while not increasing quality of care. This describes why medical care has decreased in quality while increasing in cost

This is also with the understanding that there is no universal healthcare in the US. Instead there are faulty covid experimental "vaccines". Not the best of times.

The Movie Bicentennial Man

                  The Movie Bicentennial Man The movie Bicentennial Man was one of the greatest movies produced in the 1990s. The movie was ...