The Doctors and Scientists That Told Individuals to Not Take the covid "vaccines"

 The Doctors and Scientists That Told Individuals to Not Take the covid "vaccines"

In the year 2020, there were doctors and scientists who decided to tell individuals to not take the covid "vaccine". The doctors and scientists were from different nations including from China, Uruguay, Italy, Japan, and the United States. The doctors and scientists described that the covid "vaccine" was fairly recent (being approved in 9 months) and needed additional time to study the effects of the vaccine.

Scientists and doctors from different nations described that it would be better to not take the vaccine because it had not been studied rigourously for multiple years. This was in 2020 when the vaccine was being touted as the only manner to prevent death from covid, cure covid, and prevent additional cases. The scientists and doctors described that the arguments were flawed and that the covid vaccine needed additional time to be deemed effective and safe. 

Brave scientists and doctors in 2020 decided to speak truth than to tell individuals to vaccinate with an experimental vaccine. They were probably not liked by the socialists and yet spoke truth. The righteous physicians and scientists decided to tell the truth than to harm their patients. This was while the media was saying day and night that the covid vaccine was the only manner to end the covid pandemic. (The media never stated that individuals can boost their immune system with proper nutrition and exercise. Nor that a covid viral infection can lead to immunity.) Then there is the question of how can there be multiple variants of covid instead of the eradication of the supposed "virus" after vaccinations? Nations that vaccinated have variants, and nations that did not vaccinate do not have variants.

I spoke out in 2021 when the vaccines were noted to cause blood clots. In a specific nation (may have been Denmark), warning labels were placed to indicate that the covid vaccines may cause blood clots. This was when children of 5-11 years of age were the next group that was touted as needing vaccinations by pseudo-science socialists. Despite the incentives offered once the vaccination rate had decreased, individuals kept denying the vaccine. (Even with the incentive of a free beer, donut, scratch off or lottery ticket, and gift cards in the US). I think that the actual percentage of people vaccinated globally never passed 60% and may be anywhere from 50-60% of people receiving one vaccine. There were false reports online as top searches in 2023 or 2024 that stated that 80% of people globally were vaccinated with at least one vaccine. Seems highly unlikely because at 50% the rates of vaccination decreased significantly. Even with incentives, the media promoting the vaccine for 3 years on the news, and additional covid vaccine commercials, individuals refused vaccinations. In 2022 (2 years after saying that all covid vaccines were the same in 2020), Moderna covid vaccines were noted to contain double the mRNA quantity as vaccines from Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Aztra Zeneca. The double quantity of mRNA may explain the adverse health reactions including strokes, blood clots in the lungs, anaphylactic reaction (severe allergic reactions), fatigue, generalized weakness, shortness of breath, and neurological symptoms. We can be grateful to GOD Almighty for good individuals who cared more about speaking truth than telling lies about an experimental vaccine. We can also keep learning about science and history so that we can avoid pseudo-science and lies. There is no doubt that the covid "vaccines" were invented by socialists. (The 1976 flu vaccines were also prepared in haste to an unknown viral strain and resulted in hundreds or thousands of individuals having side effects including death (the unknown 1976 flu virus caused only one death and few infirmities. Only one third of the US was vaccinated.) Dr. Sabin spoke out and said that the vaccine needed to be stored in case of pandemic and not used until there was the need. The vaccines were recalled in 3 months after physicians spoke out against the vaccine.)

6 Years Later and There is Still No Mention of the Origin of the covid "Virus"

The socialists still have not stated how the covid "virus" originated. There was the story of a supposed bat soup that was eaten in China that supposedly led to the covid "pandemic". From what I know, bats are reservoirs of rabies and not covid. I also doubt that there are Chinese individuals that eat bat soup. If bats were the reservoir of covid, then there would have been more cases prior to 2019. However prior to 2019, bats were only known to cause rabies. This describes that the pandemic is still not explained with logic nor with veracity. The covid "virus" has an illusive origin since it causes respiratory symptoms, yet no animal reservoir has been identified (i.e. Avian and Swine flu). The other cause stated was close contact with individuals that had respiratory symptoms. Yet the "virus" has not been gathered, studied, or sequenced? Even the 1918 virus was able to be gathered, studied, and sequenced successfully and that was in the past century, but not the covid "virus" in 2019?

The socialists stated no social gatherings because it may lead to covid infections, yet there is the question of where the virus originates from? There was a commercial on the TV in 2020 that stated that young individuals should not speak to their elder family members because they can spread covid. The commercial seemed disingenous and propaganda. I still spoke to older family members and even an acquaintance of a family member about not getting vaccinated with the covid "vaccine" since it was created in 9 months and not 8-10 years. I told them not to trust the lies and to not get vaccinated. The older family members did not develop covid infection from a conversation. So the commercial (in a Mexican TV channel) probably did not want youth to learn from grandparents who probably have healthy skepticism, wisdom from experience, and have lived through the Great Depression, First World War, Second World War, Cold War, Civil Rights Movement, Collapse of the Soviet Union, 9/11 and destabilization of the Middle East, Collapse of the Banking System in 2009, Avian Flu, Swine Flu, E. Bola outbreak, and still had motivation, encouragement, healthy skepticism, and a sense of humor. In 2021, I still spoke to my grandparent and her friend that they did not need a covid vaccine and also in 2021 spoke out against the covid "pandemic" and experimental vaccine propaganda.

Figures of History and Individualism is meant to remind us that there are good people despite the lies of the snake. While the snake says that "everyone sins and is evil," the reality is that there have been and there are individuals who are good, positive, practice integrity, and hate evil. We can persevere practicing civil disobedience, pacifism, and worshiping GOD Almighty above everything of this temporary and imperfect world. We can persist acknowledging that GOD Almighty is everything to us and deny the lies of the snake.

Immanuel Kant

 Immanuel Kant

Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who described that individuals have the moral imperative to maximize utilitarianism. Utilitarianism describes that everyone works for the good of others and so that society benefits. This means that individuals decide to practice goodness and responsibility because it maximizes the good in society. This allows for society to keep improving and everyone benefits. 

Christianity is the source of utilitarianism and is described being goodness. We learn that marxism has attempted to say that "marxism is utilitarianism" while actually being dishonest, self-serving, deceitful, envious, covetous, and greedy. The source of greed and non-competition is socialism (in the forms of communism, anarchy, and monopoly "capitalism"). Why does socialism attempt to create a two tier system in every country it tries to deceive and where it has been a failure?

Therefore, marxism is not utilitarian. Marxism is actually covetous and seeks to prevent the common good for the benefit of the greedy few. (3 billion people in the world can not read described since the 2000s.) Immanuel Kant described that utilitarianism is preferred to selfishness and egoism. To the logical mind, there are questions of how can wanting the best for others help oneself? The answer is that when everyone practices empathy, everyone benefits. That is why the wicked were reproved, chastised, and disciplined. This was to prevent the gangrene of socialism from infecting society and civilization. 

Immanuel Kant describes that society benefits when everyone is responsible and good. This has been seen in multiple nations that accepted Christianity and resulted in amazing development and growth in education, employment opportunities, creating innovations, and improving the economies that benefitted everyone. The United States was founded by Pilgrims who preached and obeyed GOD Almighty. The United States has improved significantly due to Christianity even with racist socialists. Spain and Portugal also improved with Catholicism allowing Spain to discover America with Christopher Columbus in 1492, and Portugal also discovering Brazil with Amerigo. South America has also improved since schools and churches were planted and the caste systems of the Incas and Aztecs were removed. The only individuals that hate that everyone improves are... the fickle and angry socialists. Socialists disdain that individuals can improve because instead they see their bretheren as "competition" although they do not actually like to compete. We learn that since Christianity planted schools and churches in America, North and South America has improved. There have been improvements including the advancement of Democratic Republics and capitalism. (There is the beautiful story of how Brazil asked for independence from Portugal in a letter. Portugal responded by saying that Brazil was free and independent and no warfare resulted. This describes that we can live in harmony with one another and there is no need for warfare and conflict.) Democracy and capitalism have allowed for true utilitarianism to occur. This is something that socialist idolators hate (especially warmongers). This describes why we can not believe that marxism is "utilitarianism". Christianity preaches true utilitarianism. 

Figures of History and Individualism is meant to remind us that there are good people despite the lies of the snake. While the snake says that "everyone sins and is evil," the reality is that there have been and there are individuals who are good, positive, practice integrity, and hate evil. We can persevere practicing civil disobedience, pacifism, and worshiping GOD Almighty above everything of this temporary and imperfect world. We can persist acknowledging that GOD Almighty is everything to us and deny the lies of the snake.

Andrew Jackson

 Andrew Jackson

Andrew Jackson was an American Major General and President of the United States. Jackson is villified and hated in history books for reasons not completely described. While Jackson is blamed for relocating Native Americans to reservations, there is more to the story than what is described in history books. Andrew Jackson was not establishment meaning he was actually from humble beginnings. He was not born into affluence and was not a trust fund beneficiary. 

Jackson was a soldier and was able to improve and be promoted to the point that he became a commander. In 1812, he fought against the British and won the Battle of New Orleans. The Americans would defeat the British in the War of 1812. Jackson would also fight against Creek Indian tribe uprisings, and also won those battles. Jackson was disciplined and righteous. Jackson had seen that some Native Americans tribes were still hostile despite genuine empathy from Americans and attempted to resolve a manner that there could be serenity between Americans and Native Americans (Native Americans still wanted to war constantly and also do peyote. There are multiple stories of Native American Chiefs that wanted to keep warring for the sake of warring. Socialist lies state that Native Americans lived in harmony without wars and it was the "Pilgrims who started wars". The same "evil" Pilgrims (knew about disease and bacteria in the 1600s while germ theory was yet to be discovered in the 1800s by Louis Pasteur) who knowingly gave free blankets with disease to Native Americans.)

Jackson decided to create reservations and allow the Native Americans to still live in the US in reservations. The history books describe that he was a "dictator" and hated Native Americans arbitrarily when this was a blatant lie. (The Pilgrims created Jamestown in the 1600s, and the Native Americans burned down that settlement in 1676. Other Native America Chiefs kept attacking settlements despite Pilgrims being kind and caring.) Instead Jackson had the first hand account of the reality having served in different wars. 

Who really hated Andrew Jackson? The establishment of those times for being genuine, brave, patriotic, and humble. Jackson was elected in 1828 and was a humble president. Jackson thwarted the creation of the Second American Bank of the US based on what we considered "elite interests". (Alexander Hamilton had fought against the First Bank and was hated also). The Bank was meant to print unlimited money in order to stimulate the economy. Jackson was against printing money that was not backed by silver, gold, or precious metals. This is the real story of the hatred against Andrew Jackson. Jackson also promoted humble individuals from modest backgrounds to positions in the White House. This irritated the establishment who only wanted socialists and establishment members in positions of authority even in the 1800s. Jackson was an individual that was humble throughout his life and no dictator. Jackson cared about citizens, wanted serenity and harmony between everyone, and fought the Bank that wanted to print unlimited money. Andrew Jackson was an amazing president. (I myself am of multiple ethnicities including part Native American and not offended at the truth.) 

Figures of History and Individualism is meant to remind us that there are good people despite the lies of the snake. While the snake says that "everyone sins and is evil," the reality is that there have been and there are individuals who are good, positive, practice integrity, and hate evil. We can persevere practicing civil disobedience, pacifism, and worshiping GOD Almighty above everything of this temporary and imperfect world. We can persist acknowledging that GOD Almighty is everything to us and deny the lies of the snake.

 

Paul Revere

 Paul Revere

Paul Revere was an American Patriot in the 1770s. Revere was part of the American Revolution (a true Revolution and not persecution). Revere is denoted as having bravery and courage to have warned Samuel Adams and John Hancock that the English were seeking to go after rebels including Adams and Hancock for signing the Declaration of Independence in 1776. When Revere learned that the British had incoming ships, he rowed through a river undetected by British ships, galloped through the countryside, and yelled out the indication that the British were in America. Revere went to Lexington and woke up Adams and Hancock. The United States decided to be independent from England because they were self-sufficient and were being taxed without representation. 

England had decided to exact taxes arbitrarily on the Americans due to the manner that they were industrious. The American Revolutionaries did not want to be taxed arbitrarily and decided to declare their independence from tyrannical England. The English were looking to arrest and remove Hancock and other individuals who supported the American call for freedom.

Once Paul Revere learned that the British were in America, he warned the American Revolutionaries that the "regulars were out!" and that the British were about. To this, Revere had courage despite knowing that if he was captured, he would have been charged with treason. Despite that, Revere warned the American militia and Revolutionaries describing the real American Patriotism that cares about their land and their bretheren. Revere risked his life to warn his American bretheren of opposition and is regarded in history as a real hero. 

Revere after warning his fellow bretheren was almost captured by British troops on almost reaching the town of Concord. When the British had surrounded Revere, shots fired out from American militia muskets and the British took off leaving Revere unharmed and uncaptured. Revere knew that the shots fired were from American militia members. The American militia defended Revere and also repelled the British at Concord. Despite not having an army and not being the world power at that time, the American militia was able to beat the British troops and obtain freedom. Paul Revere is considered an example of American bravery and true fraternity who allowed fellow Americans to persevere despite opposition. (We can persevere reminding ourselves of amazing individuals who were brave and persevere with integrity. We can persevere trusting in GOD Almighty and avoiding socialism.)

Figures of History and Individualism is meant to remind us that there are good people despite the lies of the snake. While the snake says that "everyone sins and is evil," the reality is that there have been and there are individuals who are good, positive, practice integrity, and hate evil. We can persevere practicing civil disobedience, pacifism, and worshiping GOD Almighty above everything of this temporary and imperfect world. We can persist acknowledging that GOD Almighty is everything to us and deny the lies of the snake.

Literary Review

 Literary Review of the Unraveling of America by Allen Matusow

The book by Matusow describes the 1960s through different persepectives. The first section details the importance of John Fitzgerald Kennedy and his presidency in allowing America to improve despite the existence of socialism. Kennedy's presidency displayed how classical liberalism helped improve the United States by fighting for Civil Rights, using Keynesian economics to get the country out of a recession, created jobs, prioritized schools, wanted to send a man to the moon in the Space Race against the Soviet Union, created the Peace Corps, and fought agaist socialism. Kennedy was a bureaucrats nightmare for choosing to improve the United States through jobs and educations consistent with Christianity, Democracy, and capitalism. (Nixon is described in positive terms at times while he was a crook while Kennedy was criticized concerning the Cuban Missile Crisis. Kennedy was described having a "personal vendetta against Castro" while Castro had nuclear weapons pointed at the US in Cuba. It seems that Kennedy was defending the US against Cuba and there was no vendetta, but actually removal of nuclear threats. Kennedy is described being impressive throughout the book yet at times is criticized unfairly in the book. This is while racist affluent socialists in SDS are described being a part of the Civil Rights Movement.)

The book also significantly contrasts the mid 1960s when the disillusionment from Kennedy's assassination attempted to discourage Americans from being idealistic and courageous (Socialists envied JFK including Hoover, Sullivan and Nixon for being an impressive and innovative leader who practiced empathy and was a real Catholic Christian). The socialists attempted to cause a racial and class war between American citizens because the US had improved under Kennedy who was a classical liberal. The "counter culture" movement was created by socialists to prevent any further improvements by conservatives and classical liberals in the US. The socialists wanted Americans fighting against Americans based on race. (Racist socialists wanted to keep segregation and were oppressing and persecuting the Civil Rights Movement activists. The intention was for racist socialist bureaucrats to radicalize African Americans and minorities into aggression and violence against Caucasian racists so that bureaucrats could propagate further conflict and division so that there was no unity. The Civil Rights Movement kept civility and prevented a race war that was intended by the socialist bureaucrats in the 1960s.) Then the socialists in 1964 and 1965 attempted to foment class war. The bureaucrat socialists denied grants to Civil Rights activists like Farmer for ending segregation on buses, trains, and airplane while they gave grants to socialist "intellectuals". The socialist propaganda promoters gave free paychecks to poor socialists in order to instigate race and class war. Socialist "intellectuals" made propaganda to instigate class and race warfare identifying themselves with the oppressed while being affluent. (While being affluent they also helped themselves to tax payer funds.)  The intention was not equality but fomenting division and chaos. Despite all of this, Americans citizens still kept integrity and did not give in to incivility and violence. Idolatry was seen shapeshifting since the 40s from socialist nazism to beats to hippies to materialism to SDS to racism to marxism to rock and roll to the Liberation Party to weatherman to Black Panthers to communism to bureaucracy. Socialism is deception and does not have a stable basis. Despite the different iterations of tempting to disobey the commandments of Moses, socialism fails. We are created to practice empathy and not envy. 

Socialism is the Source of the World's Problems

In contrast to the start of the book that describes an impressive United States under classical liberal, JFK, the book also describes how socialism and counterculture attempted to diminish and decrease the United States in the mid 1960s. The book concludes that the existence of socialism in the mid 1960s contributed to the election of Ronald Reagen in the 1980s and clear repudiation of marxism in the US. This does not mean that socialism has disappeared but means that the socialists became covert socialists. The book describes how college affluent students were indoctrinated (and deceived) by socialist agents who may also have been FBI agents such as Black Panthers H. Rap Brown and Carmichael, Mark Rudd, LeRoi Jones, Marcuse, Savio, and Brown. The socialist agents preached hate and racism in order to cause a class and racial war between Americans. Affluent college students also decided to rebel against a quality education preferring to foment division in SDS and also shutting down classes for others. Despite such opposition from marxists against Education, Democracy, capitalism, and genuine empathy, it is stated that only 1 out of 5 students were marxists in 1967. Despite the abrasiveness and foolishness of marxists, only 1 out of 5 college students were socialists. This helps us know that the majority of students in the United States and in the mid 1960s preferred Christianity, Democracy, and capitalism to marxism.

While marxism wanted to eradicate classical liberalism and conservatism, it was actually socialism that declined in the 1960s and later led to the popularity of humble conservatism that was anti-establishment under Carter and Reagen. Despite the oppressiveness and negativity of marxism, moderates were able to persist protecting Democracy and capitalism from racist marxists. Instead classical liberalism and conservatism increased,  and marxist counter culture (not actually culture but heathenism) declined. This was described in how racist socialist groups declined in the 1960s including SDS, weatherman, Black Panthers, marxists, and progressive liberal party. SDS declined seen in how students were barricading universities instead of helping others get a quality education. Instead of fighting the source of inequality that is socialism and socialists, affluent college students trashed their universities and cities. Socialists fought against police in order to be allowed to trash schools and universities. Marxists went to schools and staged sit ins to indoctrinate students in socialism. When confronted with the National Guard on different occassions, the coward socialists dispersed. Marxist students only fought against police when they had more numbers and never against marshalls and the National Guard. Matusow described in great detail the cowardice of marxist affluent students who were neither fighting for the working class nor for their own betterment but for disorder and non-sense. Marxist affluent students wanted to end Democracy and capitalism and instead created a rise in moderates and conservatives who saw that marxism is essentially parasitic and deleterious.

Constructive Criticism Concerning How the Civil Rights Movement Had Nothing To Do With Racism and Marxism

At times the book describes that the racist and marxist groups originated from the Civil Rights Movement. This is a lie. The Civil Rights Movement was anti-violence and anti-segregation. The racist groups and marxist groups were pro-violence and pro-segregation. The Civil Rights Movement is mutually exclusive from the racist marxist groups because pacifism has nothing to do with aggression. The book at times makes statements that the marxist groups were with the Civil Rights Movement, helped, or were derived from the Civil Rights Movement. This is a lie. Independent individuals who may have become radicalized and chosen to practice marxism in the times of the 1960s were no longer Civil Rights activists. Yet it may have been that marxists attempted to obfuscate the truth by calling themselves Civil Rights Activists in order to blame the Civil Rights Movement for riots and looting. This was also to make it appear that Democrats were distruptive and chaotic when in fact it was marxists who were rioting and looting. Marxists projected their evil actions onto Classical Liberals and Christians. (The book was written in the 70s or 80s and may have not conflagrated marxists with the Civil Rights Movement and classical Liberals with malicious intent. The book does describe that marxists were disruptive and disobedient and actually the source of conflict and quarreling). However at times it does criticize Civil Rights leaders with intense scrutiny (MLK could have retired early from the Civil Rights Movement in 1964) while easing off on Hoover (lied to JFK about MLK being a communist and Hoover kept bugging MLK until 1966, yet JFK is described as having allowed the espionage. Hoover was responsible for the espionage and also persecuted JFK and MLK), Sullivan, and Nixon (a "reformed" Nixon was a lie because Nixon was always a crook). Civil Rights Activists kept their integrity and values and were never a part of socialism. Although the book does describe marxist groups as the culprit of the instability in the 1960s.

"[Describing 1961] Participatory democracy was SNCC's implicit goal, anarchism its intuitive philosophy."- (page 346)

"How black power evolved out of the civil rights movement and then failed ideological challenge was one of the decade's more melancholy stories."- (page 345)

The author described that in 1961, SNCC's goal was "participatory democracy" when in fact it was desegregation and enfranchising disenfranchised African-Americans. Initially in the early 1960s, SNCC was working by using pacifism and civil disobedience consistent with MLK's beliefs. The goal was not anarchism nor marxism that was called "participatory democracy" by socialists that included rioting, looting, and harassment. The goal of SNCC in 1961 was breaking apart racist segregation laws in public places and educating African-Americans on their voting rights. This could hardly be called anarchism or "participatory democracy" that was used by marxists to call for harassment of liberals and conservatives. The description was not true because anarchism and harassment was used by marxists in 1965 and was described as "participatory democracy". SNCC in 1961 was harassed and reviled by racist socialists for educating disenfranchised African-Americans on their voting rights and helping them learn how to vote. Racist socialists were actually anarchists and used "participatory democracy" against SNCC in 1961 for educating and helping their African American brethen to exercise their right to vote.

There was a specific quote that described that nationalism (hating other nationalities or ethnicities) "evolved" from the Civil Rights Movement, yet it actually originated from marxism. The socialist Caucasian racists oppressed pacifist African Americans, Caucasians, and minorities in order to lead to a race war. Racist and idolatrous African Americans and minorities attempted to radicalize individuals to use violence and aggression against racists in order to keep promoting violence and racism. The righteous Civil Rights Activists were not a part of calling for violence and resisted hate. To equate the marxist racists to Civil Rights is to equate unneeded war with pacifism or racism with equality. 

Christopher Hitchens

 Christopher Hitchens

Christopher Hitchens was an atheist that fought against the lies of post-modernism and socialism. During the mid-2010s, Christopher Hitchens described the incongruencies and discrepancies that existed between the lies of post-modernism and the truth of true liberalism. We learn that in the mid-2010s, the marxist feminists and socialists began to be more envious and resentful attempting to cause individuals to use supposed preferred pronouns and cater to their perceived offenses and sensibilities.

Christopher Hitchens was an atheist that argued with socialists and marxist-feminists about the lack of congruency from said false doctrines. While Christopher Hitchens was an atheist, he was able to fight against hypocritical arguments and lies. Christopher Hitchens argued about how individuals have autonomy to not use preferred pronouns and how individuals can not be compelled to use preferred pronouns.

Christopher Hitchens also fought against the restrictive and offended socialist-left that did not want individuals to learn about truth based on being offended for everything. We learn that Christopher Hitchens described how being offended from the socialists was a strategy to prevent the speaking of truth. Hitchens would argue succinctly and convincingly against radical feminists and socialists who believed in double standards and attempted to defend socialism.

Hitchens was important in helping us see that we do not have to believe the temporary lies of socialism nor use preferred pronouns that attempt to restrict freedom of speech. In the mid-2010s in universities, socialism attempted to restrict freedom of speech through the use of preferred pronouns and also catering to the offenses of offended socialists. We learn that there were individuals that valued freedom and autonomy who spoke out against socialism and marxist-feminism. I do not know if Christopher Hitchens converted to Christianity, yet he did fight against socialism and communism describing the incongruencies of double standards and restrictions of freedom of speech.

Christopher Hitchens Described the Need to Not Be Elitist and Arrogant Based on IQ

"There is, and there always has been, an unusually high and consistent correlation between the stupidity of a given person and that person's propensity to be impressed by the measurement of IQ."- Christopher Hitchens

Hitchens has a specific quote that describes that IQ is not everything. There have been racist studies that have stated that IQ is fixed and that races are superior based on IQ (from racist socialists obviously). While IQ has been demonstrated to describe intelligence, it does not actually reflect all the intelligence of a person. Greater than intelligence is wisdom. Wisdom allows individuals to worship GOD Almighty above everything and persevere improving in wisdom. Scripture says that even intelligence can improve in the worship of GOD Almighty. We learn that more important than IQ is how individuals decide to use their intelligence. Individuals that are humble know that IQ is not everything and it is more important that individuals use their talents for the worship of GOD Almighty and for good than for evil. 

Hitchens described that individuals should not care so much about IQ. Instead individuals should keep improving themselves. There are also studies in Positive Psychology that have shown that there are different types of intelligence and that intelligence can actually keep improving throughout one's life instead of remaining fixed. There are Psychology studies that show that intelligence can actually improve with age if individuals decide to keep learning. Instead of being arrogant and elitist based on IQ, we can have gratitude towards GOD Almighty who tells us that wisdom is greater than intelligence and that there is the need to have empathy for others instead of discouraging others with negativity. (There was an Asian teacher who had one of the highest IQs in the modern age and yet decided to teach and help others instead of going into a lucrative career. The teacher acknowledged that he cared greater about sharing his talents and giving a quality education to students instead of caring about money.)

Hitchens Was an Atheist Yet Fought Against the Socialist Sycophants

While Christopher Hitchens was not a Christian and was actually an atheist, Hitchens fought against the hypocrisy and sycophantry of socialists. In America, there have been different political parties describing that freedom of speech is not only allowed but also celebrated. This is because freedom of speech allows us to see different points of views and perspectives and choose the better choice. Instead of only having one political party seen in Soviet Russia in the 1920s, America had multiple political parties at the same time. Some political parties even faded into oblivion seen in the pro-slavery democrats of 1865 (although there are still racists in the US) who lost the election to Abraham Lincoln who was an anti-slavery Democratic-Republican. Having multiple political parties allowed us to see that there can be differing points of view and yet individuals can live in peace and serenity with one another. This is a clear distinction between improving Democratic Republics and socialist stagnated countries. 

Socialists in the 2010s began to say that individuals should be restricted from speaking truth on account that the truth can be offensive to some people (socialists find the truth offensive because they speak lies, do not like competition, and envy that multiple view points can exist in Democratic Republics while people live in harmony.) Socialists hate individuality and the freedom to think and actually cherish oppression and speaking lies (seen in the opposition to the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.) Socialists began censoring people in the 2010s because they did not want free thinking individuals speaking the truth. While Hitchens was not perfect, he was not a sycophant. Hitchens spoke out against socialists who tried to restrict his freedom of speech rights because he was authentic and unique. Hitchens criticized snobbery based on IQ, criticized socialism, and hated conformism seen in sycophantry. The socialists in the 2010s did not want comedians speaking truth in stand up, intellectuals arguing for liberty and autonomy, and clergy members speaking well of Christianity. Hitchens also criticized marxist-feminist hypocrisy describing that LGBT feminists and homosexuals were trying to appear to be offended to restrict freedom of speech that obviously was not pro-socialism nor pro-communism. Instead of ignoring comedians, intellectuals, and Christians, they actually wanted to prevent comedy, logic, and autonomy from being spoken about describing the hypocrisy of socialists. This is while they did not want anyone restricting their freedom of speech. Hitchens saw straight through the charade in the 2010s and spoke out against socialist sycophantry and hypocrisy. His arguments against socialism and communism are intense and most if not all socialists were not able to argue back with logic and obviously attacked Hitchens with ad hominem attacks (revilings) and by feeling offended. Hitchens helped individuals know that socialism and communism are not good and should be avoided. We should avoid sycophantic socialists who actually hate autonomy and that individuals can live in peace having different points of view. Socialists actually hate freedom and diversity in all its forms including the freedom to think differently, the freedom to learn different perspectives, and the freedom to be unique.

Christopher Hitchens Also Repudiated Henry Kissinger

Christopher Hitchens was a journalist who not only fought against easily offended marxist fascists but also wrote against Kissinger. Hitchens described that Henry Kissinger was an evil individual who had caused unneeded warfare in Vietnam and Cambodia. Kissinger was a neoconservative, marxist imperialist, and idolator. Hitchens wrote a book on Kissinger and described that Kissinger was actually a warmonger. Hitchens was opposed by marxists describing that he may have been right on Kissinger. Marxists and neoconservatives (war mongerers) are actually idolators and worshipers of the snake.

This would describe why moderates have been despised by socialist marxists and racist warmongers since the 1960s. This is because moderates are not conflict causing, prefer debating ideas, and oppose violence. Meanwhile, marxists hate peace and serenity (9/11 that led to Iraq and Afghanistan invasion instead of going after the FBI and FBI trained terrorists. There is gangstalking but no prevention of 9/11), hate arguments with logic and decorum (because there is no logic in marxism), and are pro-aggression. Despite the evil of the marxists, there is justice. (In Benghazi where the American diplomat was probably allowing for there to be peace, the marxist warmongers attempted to destabilize the area. Most of the American soldiers were able to survive and return home.) Kissinger had done harm instead of benefitting society.

Figures of History and Individualism is written to motivate and instruct the importance of fighting against sin, idol worship, self-worship, and the temporary lies that have increased over the years. We learn that despite not living in the best of times, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against the temporary lies of evil and did not become indoctrinated to false doctrines of hate and lust. When the snake tries to discourage, we can remind ourselves of individuals who fought against indoctrination, hate, and envy seen in socialism and communism.

The Creators of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy Films

 The Creators of The Lord of the Rings Trilogy

The films, the Lord of the Rings, were amazing because they were based on the books of J.R.R. Tolkien. Tolkien made amazing books in the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings. The films were impressive because they kept to the books and were made in the 1990s or 2000s prior to the LGBT trying to limit and prevent free speech and the telling of amazing stories (prior to the 2010s). While the Lord of the Rings is fiction, it is an impressive story of bravery and goodness. 

The story describes a battle between good and evil. We learn that an evil individual, Sauron, decided to create rings that contained power. The evil individual wanted to have unlimited power over the whole world. The different rings were combined into one ring that could rule everything. The evil ring gets lost and is found by a hobbit named Bilbo Baggins. Despite Bilbo not being strong, he is able to defeat a dragon and take its treasures. Among the treasures, was the evil ring.

Baggins wears the ring and notices that he becomes invisible. Despite the supposed superpower that the ring provides, Baggins is able to be wise and does not depend on the ring. Baggins lives independent of the ring's seduction for invisibility and power. Baggins has dominion over the ring and lives his life normally. It is until there is war that Baggins understands that the ring is evil and must be destroyed. Since he was advanced in age, he gives the task to Frodo to take the ring and destroy it. Frodo is innocent, positive, good, and brave. Frodo and the Hobbits lived in harmony until the wicked decided to wage war and wanted complete control over everything.

Frodo along with a few other Hobbits do not fear and decide to take the ring to Mordor to destroy it. Frodo is courageous and decides to embark on a journey to rid the Middle Earth of the dreaded evil ring. Frodo has opposition from the wicked, yet decides to persevere with high courage and unwavering determination. The three films are superb and impressive. The ratings were also positive with the original film being given 9 out of 10 stars (the other films also were given great reviews). The films are a cinema masterpiece. The Lord of the Rings describes the beauty of harmony and serenity contrasted to war. Despite the coveting and envy that resulted in war, there were brave individual that fought against tyranny by choosing to practice integrity and goodness. The films and books describe that it is possible to persevere with bravery and courage despite the existence of envy and coveting that is of evil.

 

The Lord of the Rings Describes That There is Power in Self-Restraint and Discipline

While most movies and series attempt to say that might is in muscles and height, the Lord of the Rings describes that there is power in self-control. Frodo is not tall nor muscular yet is powerful because he is able to deny the allure of the evil ring. While most individuals were tempted to wear the ring and thought that the ring gave power, in reality, it was diminishing individuals. The ring gave the ability to be invisible, yet was diminishing the wearer of the ring. Frodo similar to Baggins is able to have self-restraint and is weary of the ring. Frodo is given the mission to reach Mordor that is the territory of Sauron and destroy the ring. Instead of being fearful, Frodo accepts the mission and has healthy skepticism about the temptation of wearing the ring. Frodo is amazing because while he fights different enemies and opposition, he does not get discouraged. Frodo is opposed by Sauron, Sauron's personal army, orcs, giant spiders, and a fake hobbit in Gollum. (Even Frodo had a fake peer.)

Despite the opposition, Frodo persists. While he is tempted to wear the ring, Frodo fights temptation and perseveres with integrity. The ring also lies and tells its wearers that they can become powerful beyond imagination if they only wear the ring. Frodo decides to deny temptation and keeps on his journey. The books and films describe that a human being is far more powerful when he decides to remove sin and perseveres with bravery and integrity. We saw how Gollum was devastated by years of using the ring and believing the lies. Gollum looked withered, bluish purple or gray (almost hypoxic), and paranoic for wearing the evil ring. Frodo persevered without diminishment because he had dominion over the ring. We can persevere denying sin, denying lying temptations, and acknowledge that we do not believe lying propaganda from marxist socialists. We can persevere trusting in GOD Almighty and paying attention to helpful and positive information instead of discouraging and unhelpful infomation that wants to lead to sin. (We can set aside time in the day to read positive information seen in Scripture, Positive Psychology, and amazing individuas who persevered with integrity so that we encourage ourselves. We also must exercise each day minimum 30 minutes each day except Shabbath to boost our immune system. Our immune system gets better with age and is to be trusted over an experimental "vaccine" created in haste and approved in 9 months that lasts 6 months. We can remove any socialist propaganda and distrust socialists since marxists wanted individuals to vaccinate their children including their 6 month olds. Also there is the need to not believe any revilings and insults from marxists who hate Christianity, Democracy, capitalism, discipline, happiness, competition, bravery, goodness, integrity, themselves, their country, and others.)