The Doctors and Scientists That Told Individuals to Not Take the covid "vaccines"

 The Doctors and Scientists That Told Individuals to Not Take the covid "vaccines"

In the year 2020, there were doctors and scientists who decided to tell individuals to not take the covid "vaccine". The doctors and scientists were from different nations including from China, Uruguay, Italy, Japan, and the United States. The doctors and scientists described that the covid "vaccine" was fairly recent (being approved in 9 months) and needed additional time to study the effects of the vaccine.

Scientists and doctors from different nations described that it would be better to not take the vaccine because it had not been studied rigourously for multiple years. This was in 2020 when the vaccine was being touted as the only manner to prevent death from covid, cure covid, and prevent additional cases. The scientists and doctors described that the arguments were flawed and that the covid vaccine needed additional time to be deemed effective and safe. 

Brave scientists and doctors in 2020 decided to speak truth than to tell individuals to vaccinate with an experimental vaccine. They were probably not liked by the socialists and yet spoke truth. The righteous physicians and scientists decided to tell the truth than to harm their patients. This was while the media was saying day and night that the covid vaccine was the only manner to end the covid pandemic. (The media never stated that individuals can boost their immune system with proper nutrition and exercise. Nor that a covid viral infection can lead to immunity.) Then there is the question of how can there be multiple variants of covid instead of the eradication of the supposed "virus" after vaccinations? Nations that vaccinated have variants, and nations that did not vaccinate do not have variants.

I spoke out in 2021 when the vaccines were noted to cause blood clots. In a specific nation (may have been Denmark), warning labels were placed to indicate that the covid vaccines may cause blood clots. This was when children of 5-11 years of age were the next group that was touted as needing vaccinations by pseudo-science socialists. Despite the incentives offered once the vaccination rate had decreased, individuals kept denying the vaccine. (Even with the incentive of a free beer, donut, scratch off or lottery ticket, and gift cards in the US). I think that the actual percentage of people vaccinated globally never passed 60% and may be anywhere from 50-60% of people receiving one vaccine. There were false reports online as top searches in 2023 or 2024 that stated that 80% of people globally were vaccinated with at least one vaccine. Seems highly unlikely because at 50% the rates of vaccination decreased significantly. Even with incentives, the media promoting the vaccine for 3 years on the news, and additional covid vaccine commercials, individuals refused vaccinations. In 2022 (2 years after saying that all covid vaccines were the same in 2020), Moderna covid vaccines were noted to contain double the mRNA quantity as vaccines from Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Aztra Zeneca. The double quantity of mRNA may explain the adverse health reactions including strokes, blood clots in the lungs, anaphylactic reaction (severe allergic reactions), fatigue, generalized weakness, shortness of breath, and neurological symptoms. We can be grateful to GOD Almighty for good individuals who cared more about speaking truth than telling lies about an experimental vaccine. We can also keep learning about science and history so that we can avoid pseudo-science and lies. There is no doubt that the covid "vaccines" were invented by socialists. (The 1976 flu vaccines were also prepared in haste to an unknown viral strain and resulted in hundreds or thousands of individuals having side effects including death (the unknown 1976 flu virus caused only one death and few infirmities. Only one third of the US was vaccinated.) Dr. Sabin spoke out and said that the vaccine needed to be stored in case of pandemic and not used until there was the need. The vaccines were recalled in 3 months after physicians spoke out against the vaccine.)

Chinese Scientists Were the First to Speak Out Against the covid "virus"

At the beginning of the covid pandemic and the calls to vaccinate in 2020, Chinese scientists spoke out against taking the vaccine. Despite being in a communist country (not entirely communistic because capitalism has also been added recently), Chinese ethical scientists described that the vaccine was too recent to vaccinate with the vaccine. The ethical Chinese scientists described that it was better not to vaccinate with the covid experimental "vaccines" in 2020 and while living in China. The courageous individuals decided to speak truth than say lies.

We can be grateful to GOD Almighty for amazing scientists and doctors who refused to speak lies for temporary wealth and pleasures. Instead they warned us to have healthy skepticism about an experimental "vaccine". The courageous scientists decided to warn everyone about not taking the covid vaccine. We learn that there are good people in the world who prefer to persevere with morality than deceive their bretheren with lies and falsehoods. The Chinese scientists were the first to speak out followed by an Italian doctor who also created a video on Youtube telling individuals not to vaccinate. Then there were Japanese doctors who also spoke out against the vaccine. Uruguayan Pediatricians also told the truth and said that the vaccine should not be taken. Finally, American Doctors also spoke out against the covid vaccine. There may have been other individuals from other countries who spoke out, but in 2019-2021, I remember reading or watching videos of scientists and doctors from those countries that spoke out against the vaccine. We can persevere with gratitude to GOD Almighty for helping us have healthy skepticism and for great Doctors and Scientists who spoke out in 2019-2021 against the vaccine.

Poland Kicked Out the Medical Establishment that Wanted to Vaccinate With an Experimental "vaccine"

There was the story in the 2020s that individuals in Poland had fought against the covid "vaccines" and denied the experimental "vaccines". Poland was among the least vaccinated nations with less than 30% vaccination rates. Poland had lived through tyranny due to nazi socialism and soviet socialism. Poland understood that socialism is the worst method of governance and was able to deny the "vaccine" created by socialists. Poland was able to improve with Catholicism and denying socialism. Despite going through persecution due to Hitler and Stalin, Poland abounded in the worship of GOD Almighty. Poland also had a magnificent leader in Pope John Paul II. Poland was able to improve significantly and persevere. 

Poland in the 2020s also kicked out the socialist doctors who attempted to vaccinate and promote lies. Individuals did not believe the lies of socialism and did not get vaccinated. Individuals also distrusted the socialist doctors that wanted to vaccinate arbitrarily with new "vaccines" approved in haste in 9 months. Poland described the importance of resisting misinformation, lies, and deceit. (It is most likely that brave Polish doctors also spoke out against the "vaccine" but may have been censored by the media or technological monopoly. Censored in the sense that individuals that spoke out were not top results online on Youtube and search engines. This could also have happened against other doctors from other nations who spoke out.)

Ukraine Had the Lowest Vaccination Rate

Ukraine was the nation that had the lowest vaccination rate in the 2020s with less than 18% of the population vaccinated. Ukraine also resisted the lies and denied the experimental "vaccine". Ukraine had gone through the persecution of Stalin and was able to persevere. Since Ukraine abounded after Stalin and the Soviet Union collapsed, socialists were envious. Ukraine is one of the most industrious nations because of Christianity, and was envied by socialists. Ukraine's population also abounded with Democracy and capitalism after the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s. Ukraine had impressive economical improvement for almost four decades until covid "vaccines" attempted to decrease economic growth. Ukraine is predominantly Christian Orthodox and denied the lies of socialists. Ukrainians also denied the covid "vaccine". 

Because most of the population declined the experimental "vaccine" and were industrious, there was probably unneeded warring. (Socialism hates that individuals can improve seen in how Stalin envied industrious individuals including Solzhenytsin and individuals of other ethnicities. The FBI socialists in the 1960s envied and persecuted Civil Rights Activists who were Christian, egalitarian, and good.) Most likely instead of actual warfare, there is persecution. This describes that racist Russians and racist Ukrainians that are socialists with the CIA are persecuting and causing destruction. Despite the persecution, righteous individuals go to Heaven and do not have to live during the times of adversity. (At least we know the times we are living in. We prefer autonomy, authenticity, and freedom to envy, cowardice, and sycophantry.)

6 Years Later and There is Still No Mention of the Origin of the covid "Virus"

The socialists still have not stated how the covid "virus" originated. There was the story of a supposed bat soup that was eaten in China that supposedly led to the covid "pandemic". From what I know, bats are reservoirs of rabies and not covid. I also doubt that there are Chinese individuals that eat bat soup. If bats were the reservoir of covid, then there would have been more cases prior to 2019. However prior to 2019, bats were only known to cause rabies. This describes that the pandemic is still not explained with logic nor with veracity. The covid "virus" has an illusive origin since it causes respiratory symptoms, yet no animal reservoir has been identified (i.e. Avian and Swine flu). The other cause stated was close contact with individuals that had respiratory symptoms. Yet the "virus" has not been gathered, studied, or sequenced? Even the 1918 virus was able to be gathered, studied, and sequenced successfully and that was in the past century, but not the covid "virus" in 2019?

The socialists stated no social gatherings because it may lead to covid infections, yet there is the question of where the virus originates from? There was a commercial on the TV in 2020 that stated that young individuals should not speak to their elder family members because they can spread covid. The commercial seemed disingenous and propaganda. I still spoke to older family members and even an acquaintance of a family member about not getting vaccinated with the covid "vaccine" since it was created in 9 months and not 8-10 years. I told them not to trust the lies and to not get vaccinated. The older family members did not develop covid infection from a conversation. So the commercial (in a Mexican TV channel) probably did not want youth to learn from grandparents who probably have healthy skepticism, wisdom from experience, and have lived through the Great Depression, First World War, Second World War, Cold War, Civil Rights Movement, Collapse of the Soviet Union, 9/11 and destabilization of the Middle East, Collapse of the Banking System in 2009, Avian Flu, Swine Flu, E. Bola outbreak, and still had motivation, encouragement, healthy skepticism, and a sense of humor. In 2021, I still spoke to my grandparent and her friend that they did not need a covid vaccine and also in 2021 spoke out against the covid "pandemic" and experimental vaccine propaganda.

Removal of the Treatment of covid

It was noted by physicians that the medication that most worked against covid infection was Hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine is effective against malaria infections and was discovered to be effective against the covid virus. There were physicians who said that once Hydroxychloroquine was given to patients with moderate to severe respiratory symptoms, they resolved. Physicians stated that the medication was a good medication against covid. After 2021, the medication was removed. The medication that was helping the most was removed from the US. This is a big discrepancy concerning the covid narrative.

Doctors still decided to treat covid infections with high doses of Vitamin C and oxygen. Individuals who had respiratory symptoms improved significantly with high doses of Vitamin C. We can keep using Vitamin C in order to help boost our immune system. Vitamic C helps create biochemical reactions that boost the immune system and prevents disease. Vitamin C is not only a great supplement but can serve as treatment against cold and flus. We can persevere making sure that we eat nutritional food and exercise almost everyday 30 minutes a day except Shabbath.

Different Side Effects (Symptoms) From covid "vaccines"

Another incongruency about the covid "pandemic" was how covid "vaccines" were causing different symptoms. There were reports that covid experimental "vaccines" may have caused different side effects. The side effects included respiratory symptoms like shortness of breath, cough, and wheezing. However the vaccine also caused pulmonary embolism or blood clots in the lungs and brains of certain individuals. Some individuals developed lethal anaphylactic reactions (a young med student vaccinated once and did not survive). Other individuals may have developed Guillen Barre syndrome that leads to arm and leg weakness and neurological symptoms. Others developed fatigue and generalized weakness.

Instead of being recalled once side effects were noted in 2021, the vaccines were promoted in the media everyday for 3-4 years and with additional commercials. Then they wanted to vaccinate 6 month olds twice. The covid "vaccine" propaganda in 2020 may have been very similar to the 1976 experimental "vaccine" mass vaccination campaign to a flu strain of unknown origin except that the 1976 experimental vaccine was recalled in three months after reports of side effects. A large number of people denied the vaccine and only a third of the US population got vaccinated or 40 million of 120 million adults in 1976. So maybe only 50-60% of the global population is vaccinated once with a covid experimental "vaccine" after 6 years.

The Origin of covid variants

There are questions as to how the variants began? We know that the most vaccinated nations have variants while the least vaccinated nations do not have covid infections nor variants. It could be that the covid "vaccine" is the source of the variants. This is because nations and states that vaccinated a large portion of their population had variants. Nations and states that did not vaccinate and refused the covid "vaccines" did not have variants. There were variants in different nations that were vaccinated including reports of variants in China, India, France, and Democrat states and districts in the US during the 2020s (although there were skeptical individuals who did not vaccinate from those nations and states). Meanwhile no infections nor variants were reported in the least vaccinated nations. The statistics also seemed inflated and cooked. 6 nations were described being >99% vaccinated when even the Polio vaccine did not reach more than 70% vaccination in the 1950s. (This was when people who did not vaccinate with the polio vaccine had the risk of getting poliomyelitis and the weakening and paralysis of lower limbs.) It was stated that 9 billion vaccines were administered the first year, yet only 28-32% of the population was vaccinated once during the first year. That would be 2-3 billion vaccines administered and not 9 billion (No one vacccinated 4 times in the first year.) In the following years (2022-2023), the number of people vaccinated once may have actually been 50-60% at most and that was with incentives. The statistic of 80% of the global population being vaccinated once seems false. It was during 2022 and 2023 that the variants began to emerge.

The variants began after the administration of the covid experimental "vaccines" and not before. There was no mention of variants before the "vaccines" in 2019 or before that time. This is while no source has been identified as the cause of covid. It may be that covid is not an organic or normal virus found in nature or an animal reservoir (swine or avian flu) and instead was used to cause fear and get people vaccinated with an experimental "vaccine" that causes variants. The variants may cause respiratory symptoms along with weakness and fatigue. We can have gratitude for not being vacinated once with an experimental "vaccine" that causes variants and even symptoms.

The Media Lied For Three Years and Never Mentioned Manners to Boost the Immune System

The mainstream media on television also lied for close to three straight years about how covid experimental "vaccines" were the only manner to end the "pandemic" when a nutritious diet and exercise are more efficient at boosting the immune system. Experimental "vaccines" were touted as the only manner to eradicate the covid "virus" but did not mention that the immune system is resilient and can develop immunity to a viral infection. The media lied and said that individuals do not develop an immune response to covid, yet covid is a virus. A virus can be eliminated by the immune system. It may also be that the covid experimental "vaccines" may harm the immune system. The immune system gets better with age after combating viruses, bacteria, microorganisms, and parasites. The immune system of an individual gets better after combating pathogens. Exercise and a nutritious diet also helps improve the immune system. The news media never stated this despite promoting the experimental "vaccine" for 3 years almost every day and also having commercials. It could be that the experimental covid "vaccine" may actually cause health complications, adverse side effects, and variants. The solution to the covid variants was administrating more experimental covid "vaccines".

The media also did not say where the variants occured from nor the source of the covid virus. The covid experimental "vaccine" may be responsible for adverse health outcomes and increased number of variants. The covid "vaccine" may be worse than the covid virus. The covid virus also was noted to have a high survival rate of 95% on some sources and 99% on other sources. Malaria, E. bola, and West Nile virus are more lethal than covid and yet some of those diseases do not have vaccines.

Medical Journal Articles on covid Are Not Truthful

I read journal articles concerning covid vaccines and side effects and they seem rather false. Articles on the covid experimental vaccines described that there were few cases of side effects from vaccinations. It may be that the journal articles under reported known cases of side effects and adverse reactions. Some articles stated that there was only ten cases of adverse side effects, when it may be in the thousands or hundreds of thousands based on the number of side effects of the 1976 experimental flu vaccine of unknown strain. There were journal articles on the free database, Plus One, yet the articles did not seem very truthful. The articles did not seem to be speaking the truth and possibly underreported known side effect cases. 

There may be disinformation on medical journal articles since the 2000s. Dr. Abramson described that since the 2000s, even once prestigious and honest medical journal articles including the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) have also published lying articles from pharma company sponsored research seen in Celebrex and Vioxx. It is possible that the adverse side effects of pulmonary embolism (blood clots), chronic cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, chronic generalized weakness, Guillen Barre syndrome, anaphylactic reactions, and reporting of variants may not be truthful and underreported. The correlation and association of increase of variants and increased applications of experimental "vaccines" may also not have been made or validated (not the best of times when even medical journals lie).

Denied the Job of covid surveillance monitor

After medical school not working out, I went back to work part time jobs including Patient Satisfaction Surveyor conducting interviews with patients to know how they felt about their appointments. I also was working another part time job concurrently that was English and Spanish Interpreter (while writing in my blogs). At the Interpreter job I was being gangstalked by socialists from the past and left that job. I kept applying for other jobs during the covid pandemic in 2021 including covid surveillance monitor. (I was surprised that despite applying to 100s of jobs, I was not receiving interviews. At that time I began to reason that we are not living in the best of times.)

I received the chance to interview for covid surveillance monitor but denied the interview for the job. The covid surveillance monitor position seemed to attempt to help prevent the spread of covid while in retrospect it was probably additional stalking from the system against people who probably were given covid. I was probably given covid in 2018 while in med school. I had a cold that was worse than usual while taking exams, yet passed my exam for the Immunology block. I can not confirm that it was covid but the cold symptoms were worse than a common cold. Either manner I received immunity from the covid virus and did not need to take 4 experimental "vaccines" (especially after learning about immnology in med school). Hallellu JAH! I think that the covid surveillance monitor position actually wanted to stalk people who were given covid and survived. When people got other communicable diseases, there were no Swine flu, Malaria, or West Nile Virus  surveillance specialist position in 2009 or 2021. I think the socialists wanted to keep stalking people who survived covid infections with "calls of concern". I think most people had healthy skepticism and did not answer the phone calls or doubted the intention of the socialists. (That "job" position was created by socialists.) After some months in 2021, that job position was no longer on job posting sites meaning that people did not answer or that it was a temporary position. I am grateful to GOD Almighty allowing me to have healthy skepticism about covid propaganda and not having to stalk through the covid surveilance monitor position and much less promote the "vaccine".

Figures of History and Individualism is meant to remind us that there are good people despite the lies of the snake. While the snake says that "everyone sins and is evil," the reality is that there have been and there are individuals who are good, positive, practice integrity, and hate evil. We can persevere practicing civil disobedience, pacifism, and worshiping GOD Almighty above everything of this temporary and imperfect world. We can persist acknowledging that GOD Almighty is everything to us and deny the lies of the snake.

Dr. Robert Fletcher

 Dr. Robert Fletcher

"At the same time that medical journals are given incentives to please the drug companies, they are also given strong disincentives to go against drug company interests."

Dr. Abramson described that the medical journal articles in the 2000s were beginning to be affected by bias because of the pharmaceutical companies. Journal articles were being published that were positive reviews for newer medication when writers were choosing to hide real information to prevent negative results from being published or described in the case of Vioxx and Celebrex. In the case of Celebrex, the adverse effects were omitted from being published in the twelve month study and only the first six months of the study were published. 

Dr. Fletcher spoke truth being an editor of a journal of Internal Medicine. Dr. Fletcher published an article that stated that 44% of the drug ads in medical journals are written in a way that would lead doctors with no other source of information to prescribe improperly. Dr. Fletcher also described that 92% of the drug ads were in violation of FDA rules (Overdo$ed America page 113).

This describes the incongruency between how individuals that spoke truth to prevent medical harm to others were actually punished instead of rewarded. This was in 1992 that Dr. Fletcher described concern over drug ads in medical journals that are known to be significant in the prescribing of medication. This is similar to Dr. Gueriguian and Dr. Applegate who spoke out against the bias that the pharmaceutical companies were attempting to have on research of new medications.

Dr. Fletcher wrote in The Lancet in 2003 about how he was punished by the pharmaceutical industry who withdrew ads from the journal where he was the main editor. This describes that pharmaceutical companies have attempted to encroach and prevent real unbiased research in favor of positively reviewing newer medication that can have significant side effects and symptoms. This is interesting noting how since the 2000s, the pharmaceutical companies have attempted to prevent unbiased research in favor of newer medication approved in haste. 

Statins May Not Only Be Correlated With Incidence of Cancer But Also Strokes

"Not mentioned in the article's abstract, and mentioned only once in passing in the text, were the unexpected findings that the lower (that is, what we think of as healthier) the total and LDL (bad) cholesterol, the greater was the risk of stroke. (More on cholesterol later, but generally total cholesterol and more specifically LDL cholesterol play a role in blocking arteries, and HDL cholesterol partially counteracts this effect.) Buried with the tables included in this article were statistics showing that lower levels of total cholesterol and lower levels of LDL cholesterol were both significantly correlated with a higher risk of stroke (p< .001 and p= .04, respectively). As I read on, I was completely baffled by the authors' statement that 'we found no relation between total cholesterol levels and stroke when their own data showed that the odds were greater than 1000 to 1 that lower total cholesterol levels were associated with a higher risk of stroke? A follow-up letter to the editor of JAMA from a doctor employed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (expressing his own views) pointed out that the authors had 'neglected to discuss these findings'... The article got even stranger when it argued that its data supported the use of statins to prevent strokes in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels. Statins raise HDL cholesterol only half as much as the article found would be necessary to significantly reduce the risk of stroke. But statins lower total and LDL cholesterol at least three times more on a percentage basis, far more than enough to significantly increase the risk of stroke, according to the data from the study. Nevertheless, the article concluded that treatment of low HDL cholesterol with statin drugs could significantly decrease the risk of stroke- ignoring its own findings that the overall effect on cholesterol would be associated with increased risk of stroke."- (page 19-20)

Dr. Abramson described how statin use may be correlated with potential carcinogenicity based on a medical journal article in 1994. Dr. Abramson also described that using statin medications may also increase the risk of strokes when they were said to have decreased the risk of stroke based on medical journal articles on Pravachol medication. Medical journal articles stated that statin medications supposedly increase (good cholesterol) HDL while decreasing total cholesterol and LDL (bad cholesterol). Dr. Abramson found out that statins only increase HDL by half of the amount that would cause a health benefit while actually decreasing LDL and total cholesterol that has been proven to cause strokes. Statins decrease LDL and total cholesterol about three times as much and can cause strokes instead of helping reduce strokes. A doctor of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services even sent a letter in June 2001 to an editor of JAMA to describe the discrepency. 

Statin medications may cause strokes by reducing total cholesterol and LDL. Dr. Abramson stated that lowering total cholesterol and LDL leads to increase of strokes. Dr. Abramson also stated that exercise can be more beneficial to lowering stroke risk than taking statins, yet medical journal articles did not state that exercise is of greater benefit than statins. (Probably because exercise does not have a monetary cost while statins can be expensive if they are brand name and newer than generics.)

"I started to wonder why the article ["Pravastatin Therapy and the Risk of Stroke"] focused on cholesterol at all. The study found that other factors were just as significant as low HDL cholesterol in increasing the risk of stroke: untreated blood pressure, lack of exercise, cigarette smoking, heavy drinking... In fact, the authors of this study had used data from the same case-control study in an article published in 1998 to show that even light to moderate physical activity reduced the risk of stroke in the same people by 61 percent and that heavy exercise reduced the risk of stroke by 77 percent. The benefit of exercise documented by these authors certainly overshadows the 19 percent reduction in stroke associated with an increase in HDL of mg/dL-almost twice as much as is achievable with statins. Curiously, the authors' earlier findings about the important role of exercise were not even mentioned in the current article. And, though the authors did cite the earlier NEJM article about Pravachol and stroke, they failed to mention that the article found no relationship between low HDL levels and increased risk of stroke."- (page 20) 

Bat Masterson

 Bat Masterson

"All the toughs and thugs fear him as they do no other dozen men."- Newspaper on Bat Masterson

Bat Masterson was a sheriff who battled against the criminals in 1877 until 1902 in the United States. Masterson was an individual that had integrity and did not compromise his values. While there were criminals, Masterson was able to take down crime. Masterson was interesting because he inspired fear in the heart of criminals who did not want to fight Masterson. Masterson even captured an outlaw thug, Dave Rudabaugh. Thugs and criminals feared him for being disciplined and efficient.

Masterson was a brave sheriff and caused for crime to decrease in the 1800s. After being a sheriff for decades he decided to retire and be a sportswriter. In 1902, Masterson retired from being a sheriff. Masterson decided to write about baseball and sports in older age at the Morning Telegraph. Masterson was still creative and industrious describing the integrity and work ethic of patriotic Americans. (There is even a tv series from the 60s about Bat Masterson.) In 1905, Theodore Roosevelt offered him a job as a law enforcement officer but Masterson declined saying that in that specific location, children that had read dime novels and were grown ups would essentially see him as an enemy instead of a peace officer. Masterson said, "I would be bait for grown up kids who had fed on dime novels."(Dime novels were short stories that romanticized crime and criminality while hating law enforcement and order. Even Masterson declined the job position offered by Roosevelt and preferred to be a sportswriter knowing dime novels were intent on scapegoating law enforcement as the source of evil and romanticizing criminality.)

With the breakdown of law and order in the US since the 2010s, we can still persevere with courage trusting in GOD Almighty. We have seen how incivility and lawlessness has increased since the 2010s consistent with Scripture. (At least we know the times that we are living in.) We have seen how even police forces have changed over the years with less male law enforcement officers (some were probably falsely accused to dimish the number of male officers and increase the number of female officers due to marxist feminism in the 2010s). (Also probably because of marxists who fear equal show of force as evidenced by marxism in the 1960s where socialists only fought against police when they were greater in number but not against the army, national guard, and marshalls. The socialists fled when confronted by national guard and marshalls describing their cowardice).

Police men were probably ambushed and hated for securing peace and order in the 2010s seen in socialist democrat cities. There were reports of fake calls in order to ambush police officers who were incorruptible. Marxists hate peace and order. Despite the envy of marxists against men with integrity and values in law enforcement, individuals were able to see the truth about the times that we live in. Some officers changed professions seeing how socialists were getting help in ambushing police from envious socialist law enforcement officers (Even Bat Masterson denied a law enforcement job in 1905 and changed professions and avoided individuals who romanticized crime). We can avoid marxists, socialists, and feminists who hate real men with integrity. (We do not have to use weapons yet there is the right of self-defense in the Constitution. The important lesson is to avoid socialist rat snakes who gangstalk, have yelled at civil people in universities and schools, and some even ambushed police during the 2010s with fake calls. Despite the negativity, we can persevere avoiding rat snakes who do not know how to compete in sports and even flee when there is equal combat (socialism and cowardice are correlated). In the 60s the marxists never got into confrontations with the marshalls and national guard because of cowardice.)

Hubert Humphrey

 Hubert Humphrey

"We can take another stand, which I take, on the principle of human equality and human opportunity... for every American, regardless of race, color, or creed."

Hubert Humphrey was the Vice President of Johnson in the 1964 election. Humphrey was not a racist being a part of helping the Civil Rights Movement. Humphrey was actually anti-segregation and in favor of the Civil Rights Movement.

"We are the only country on the face of the earth that has ever dared to try to make what we call a biracial, pluralistic society work."

Humphrey would decide to be the Presidential candidate in 1968 and competed against Nixon. Despite Nixon having substantial help from the establishment in 1965-1968 to make it seem that he was the ideal candidate to end the Vietnam war and riots, Humphrey made an attempt to defeat Nixon. Nixon may have helped escalate the Vietnam war, been involved in causing riots and looting through Hoover and the FBI, helped create marxist groups and/or funded them, and may have also intimidated Johnson to make illogical legislation and decisions concerning Vietnam and Community Action Programs. 

This was while marxists protested the Vietnam War in order to decrease Johnson's popularity due to the 1964's Civil Rights Movement legislation having passed and 1965 Voter Registration Act. The media also attacked Johnson and Humphrey while giving time in the news for H. Rap Brown to foment conflict. Despite having so much opposition in the idolatrous establishment of his time, Humphrey was close to beating Nixon by less than 1%. 43.4 to 42.7 percent. Nixon used Wallace to be an alternative to Humphrey being pro-union, anti-bureaucracy, and appearing to be protestant in order to take votes from Humphrey. Because Wallace was a third party candidate, Wallace had 13.5 percent of the vote or close to 10 million votes that would have gone to Humphrey. (This was to give Nixon the election and not to give an alternative to voters.)

Humphrey decided to differ from Johnson concerning the Vietnam war and said that there was the need to prevent warfare. Humphrey had seen that Johnson had decided to not run for presidency yet had bravery to take the challenge (Johnson was probably intimidated by Hoover seeing how Civil Rights Leaders were being removed.) Johnson also attacked and discouraged Humphrey while Humphrey was campaigning to keep fighting for democracy (Johnson actually discouraged his Vice President instead of encouraging him.) Humphrey also had 250 marxists shouting over him at his speeches. (Nixon?) Even against all of that, Humphrey almost beat Nixon. The silver lining is that Humphrey was able to keep being Senator for more than a decade after the election, and Nixon would be caught with the FBI in Watergate. Nixon knew that the 1972 Democratic nominee was probably going to beat him again. Watergate was Nixon's attempt to create a one party system in the US because the Democrats were probably going to win in 1972. Nixon told the FBI to break into the Democrat Headquarters, steal information, bug the installations, and lie. Nixon and the FBI were found out. Humphrey like Spiro Agnew may not have been president but at least they were able to survive. Agnew also was prevented from being President because he was a decent, non-racist, and good person who was not a part of Watergate. Humphrey was a decent and humble individual who took it to the establishment and did not falter. Humphrey may have been a reason Nixon feared the 1972 elections and decided for Watergate. Despite Humphrey not winning the election, Nixon resigned in 1974. (Humphrey did not fear and fought for Democracy. We can see that fighting for good does make a difference. Humphrey instead of allowing Nixon an easy election in 1968, knowing that the odds were not favorable, and most likely was tempted or intimidated to take it easy on the campaign trail, decided to fight against the machine or establishment. Humphrey accomplished so much for fighting against the marxist socialist non-compete mafia.)

Humphrey Was Reviled and Intimidated While Giving Speeches at the Democratic Conventions

When Humphrey accepted the Democrat nomination for the 1968 election, there were racist marxists trying to cause conflict outside of the Democratic Convention. Thousands of marxists who were supposedly "protesting the Vietnam war" where actually attempting to make it seem that the Democrats were the cause of riots and looting. This was to cause individuals to choose Nixon or Wallace instead of Humphrey. The marxists stated that they were "protesting the war with civil disobedience" while actually instigating fights with police and law enforcement (a marxist took an American flag down from a flag pole and was instigating for clashes). The marxists were trying to instigate clashes and fights with police so that the marxists could scapegoat Humphrey as being unable to prevent incivility and being the cause of conflict and riots in order for Nixon and Wallace to gain votes. Also the marxists were instigating violence so that moderates blamed Democrats for chaotic marxists and did not vote for Humphrey. It was probably described that the uncivil marxists were Democrats instead of marxists to blame Humphrey. 

It is noted that marxist agents were involved in the uncivil street demonstrations during the Democratic Convention of 1968. The intention was to discourage Humphrey from being the Democratic nominee and also cause individuals to vote for Nixon or Wallace. Humphrey persevered despite incivility from marxists shouting at him, harrassing civilians and police, and attempting to make him seem as a bad option (moderates were tired of the chaos and non-sense of marxists, and marxists wanted to make it seem that Humphrey was allowing for the disorder and incivility while also harassing Humphrey. The marxists were working for Nixon). Despite incivility and discouragements (tear gas was used by marxists that reached Humphrey's hotel accomodations), Humphrey persisted. The leftist Democrats also did not help Humphrey and were opposition also. Humphrey was not immediately endorsed by other candidates after not winning the Democrat nomination. Johnson also discouraged Humphrey by not keeping Humphrey informed of Vietnam developments and scolded him when he described the need to end the war. 

When Humphrey was giving speeches at the Democratic conventions, he was reviled and shouted against by racist marxists probably working for Nixon. On one occassion at an Amusement Park, there were more than 250 racist hippies yelling at Humphrey to prevent him from speaking truth. Humphrey had spoken with authenticity. Humphrey described how the US needed to persevere with ethics and without racism. Humphrey described how both Nixon and Wallace were racist and were difficult to tell apart. Humphrey called Nixon, Wallace's imitator. (This is true since Wallace tried to impede an African American student from going to university, and Nixon used Wallace as a third party candidate to prevent Humphrey from winning the 1968 election. Nixon was also using racist marxists to foment division and conflict and make it seem that segregation was a better option since the Civil Rights Movement had "led to nationalism". Wallace was used by Nixon describing that Nixon was a racist. The racist nationalists were FBI agents and were inciting others to loot and riot. It was actually black panthers, weatherman, and marxists who were working for Nixon who were inciting riots and looting attempting to lead others to rioting and looting. It was not Civil Rights Activists and Christians. Civil Rights Activists and Christians were impeding a race war.) Because Humphrey was authentic and real, probably Nixon sent 250 marxists to shout over him so that individuals could not hear him. Humphrey was reviled with non-sense and temper tantrums, and yet kept fighting for freedom and democracy. Humphrey kept speaking at different convention debates and speeches despite deranged marxists who did not want others to hear the truth spoken by Humphrey. It was most likely Nixon who wanted to prevent Humphrey from speaking truth being that Humphrey was authentic, real, and genuine.

Now we know where the marxists of 2010 learned about throwing temper tantrums and shouting non-sense from. In the 2010s, there was much incivility including marxists yelling at non-hostile people and not being able to have dominion over their anger issues. Humphrey was able to persevere despite non-sensical revilings that applied more to the marxists than to Humphrey.

Johnson Tried to Discourage Humphrey From Being the Democratic Nominee

When Johnson learned that Humphrey was the Democratic Nominee, Johnson actually took to discourage Humphrey. Instead of supporting his candidacy, he took to demotivate and scold him whenever he took anti-war stances on Vietnam. In one instance, Johnson did not receive Humphrey for a meeting choosing to not allow Humphrey in the meeting. In other instances, he was discouraged from making anti-war statements concerning Vietnam. Humphrey also was not informed about Vietnam developments and learned about them in the debates or conventions with the other candidates. Despite the negative treatment, Humphrey kept fighting for Democracy. 

Despite going against the establishment, Nixon, the media, and deranged marxists that shouted at his speeches, Johnson decided to also discourage him. (This describes that Johnson was probably told to not seek re-election and to also discourage Humphrey probably by Hoover). Despite the envy and discouragements, Humphrey kept fighting back against the establishment and Nixon. Humphrey did not resort to underhanded tactics like third parties and having true Democrats shout at Nixon's speeches. (Nixon's town hall meetings where people asked questions from the audience was also not authentic. He had also prepared responses to foreknown questions.) Humphrey was amazing and did not falter fighting racism, envy, and discouragements. Humphrey is a hero.

Spencer Churchill

 Spencer Churchill

 

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts.” – Winston S. Churchill

 

Winston Spencer Churchill was born in November 30, 1874. He was to become the most important, defiant, and mentally strong leader of the Western world for the 20th century. Among the many adjectives that could describe Winston Churchill, being headstrong in a positive way allowed him to defend the liberties of those in the Western world. When nazi socialist Germany invaded Europe and terrified the world with the enormous signs of destruction, Winston Churchill refused to capitulate. Of all the English leaders in Parliament, Winston Churchill, was the only leader to refuse to sign a treaty with the German leaders. While several English leaders feared Germany and wished to pacify it through forfeiture of sovereignty, Churchill decided to mount a defense to the German might.

 

“Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.” – Winston Churchill

 

When most Europe lay crumbling from the attacks of the German armies in World War II, Churchill decided to mount a resistance. He wrote extensively to the United States in favor of getting much needed equipment to defend democracy. He wrote a speech to unite England against the tyranny of the time. He decided to mount soldiers in strategic points to allow time for reinforcements to arrive. To say the least, this will to fight despite all obstacles makes Churchill stand as a defender of Western History.

 

“Never, never, never, give up.” – Winston Churchill

 

And what else could we expect from a self-made man. He learned to write, read, and continued to excel at everything that he placed his mind to. Churchill was known to write extensively on multiple subjects from the time he acted as a war correspondent, writing about his experiences in his British army service, to his experiences flying airplanes. Winston Churchill enjoyed living and enjoyed breaking limits. We know so much about him due to his extensive writing ability and volumes of information that he would dictate or write himself. He made sure that his ideas were recorded but also made sure to have fun while at it. Such men are able to lead when history calls for it.

 

“Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.” – Winston Churchill

 

A man of many successes but also of failures. It is impossible to recount the amount of times he was criticized for simply existing. People forgot about  him after freeing the Western world from German nazi destruction. He was often ridiculed by his own party or by the opposition party but he remained calm and collected. When a woman complained that he was a drunkard, Winston quickly quipped, “I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober while you will be ugly.” Such quick wit and mental fortitude shows that no one was allowed to have fun at the expense of Churchill.

 

“If you are going through hell, keep going.” – Winston Churchill

 

Despite all his supposed eccentricities and peculiarities, Winston Churchill was a leader than united a nation that wanted to fear the enemy. Churchill inspired greatness and fortitude even in the most trying times. His famous speech shows what kind of a man he was. A man that always places one foot in front of the other and continues, no matter the circumstances. A man who did not look to inspire pity or fear but rather unity and cohesion. By resisting World War II Germany, Churchill decided to embrace truth and protect history from being ravaged by evil doctrines. Even after England suffered terrible losses of life through the defense of Europe, it gave time for a nation to come to its rescue and the rest … well here we are speaking English, enjoying a representative democratic republic, with liberties.

Winston Churchill Was Persecuted For Galvanizing the West Against Racism

"I am an optimist. It does not seem too much use being anything else."

Winston Churchill was hated and envied for describing multiple times prior to being Prime Minister the need to repudiate and fight against racism when nazi socialists were beginning to persecute innocent lives. Churchill had to write multiple books and kept writing to prevent bankruptcy being that he was being hated by socialists in England. His house was close to being repossessed for not going along with socialism. The socialists harassed and hated Churchill for not favoring capitulation to Hitler and his deranged racist madness. It is noted that they even placed billboard signs to discourage Churchill from fighting against racism. It seemed that Churchill was fighting an uphill battle and was the only individual among politicans who never believed Hitler's lies. Churchill was given the option by Hitler to meet and discuss a capitulation agreement to which Churchill decided to deny a meeting and was absent from said meeting. Churchill stated that any capitulation to Hitler would be the start of the decline of freedom. Churchill preferred to fight it out than be a henchman of Hitler. Churchill would keep writing amidst intimidation and envy and would eventually be Prime Minister of England. 

"I hate nobody except Hitler- and that is professional."

Being Prime Minister of England allowed Churchill to galvanize the United States and Europe to fight against the socialist nazis who appeared to be gaining territory. Despite the opposition, Churchill kept giving speeches and writing for the need to remove nazi socialism that, in fact, is racism. The West decided to fight against Hitler and nazi socialism and was able to describe that bravery and courage are needed. Europe and the United States fought against nazi socialists in the Second World War and were able to vanquish nazi socialism in the 1940s. After nazi socialism had declined, soviet socialism was the next opponent that threatened freedom and autonomy in the world. Churchill was not perfect but he was impressive going against the flow and choosing to be distinct. Churchill was the voice of reason when individuals wanted to capitulate to racism. Churchill would then describe the need to fight against soviet socialism. Churchill's bravery is appreciated for allowing us to know that it is possible to persevere with values and without the need to hate for no reason.

Churchill Almost Met Hitler in 1932

Winston Churchill was close to meeting Hitler in 1932 when he traveled to Germany to learn about socialism. Churchill was able to speak with Putzi who was a spokesperson for Hitler. Putzi wanted for Churchill to meet Hitler. Churchill had reservations about Hitler for being anti-semitic. Churchill could not trust Hitler because Hitler had stated his hate of Jewish individuals simply because of their ethnicity. Churchill was open minded to Putzi's discussion yet could not allow for racism. Churchill repudiated Hitler's hate of the Jewish individuals. Churchill told Putzi that an evil philosophy of racism could not be logically supported. Putzi went and told Hitler about Churchill, and Hitler told Putzi that no one knew who Churchill was. Putzi told Hitler that people could say the same about Hitler. Hitler then did not want to meet with Churchill. Churchill was able to persist without meeting racist Hitler in 1932. Since Churchill never backed down, Hitler made numerous offers at meeting Churchill in the 1930s to discourage Churchill from his anti-socialist stance. Churchill again denied meeting Hitler on different occassions and instead galvanized the West against racism. After 1932, Hitler wanted to meet Churchill because he knew Churchill was courageous, steadfast, a standard of morality and honesty, and hated nazism. Churchill never compromised his integrity and negated every meeting. Churchill instead lived to see nazism collapse in 1945. Churchill avoided bad company and became better for it.

Putzi renounced nazi-socialism after being accused of anti-patriotic sentiments (Putzi was not a sycophant and criticized socialism that led him to fall out of favor with Hitler. Not only Stalin hated free speech and autonomy to think for oneself seen in socialism). Putzi had said a comment that was offensive to Hitler. Hitler told Putzi to skydive to Spain during the Spanish Civil War and fight against the anti-socialist movement. Putzi was placed in an airplane awaiting to skydive when the plane was stopped after going in circles for a long time. Putzi realized that Hitler actually wanted sycophants and left nazi germany. Putzi renounced nazi socialism. Churchill was wise in avoiding Hitler and fighting against tyranny.

Churchill Never Gave Up

"I knew that the nation had the heart. I had the luck to give the roar."

Churchill became Prime Minister in 1940 and was able to inspire England against Hitler and nazi german racists. Prior to 1940, Churchill had seen how Hitler was a threat. Despite Halifax and other individuals advocating for capitulation to Hitler, Churchill decided to mount a resistance against racism and persecution. While Hitler was praised by nazis and racists in England, Churchill knew that nazism was not needed in the world. Churchill saw through the fake rhetoric of Hitler who used oratory as a method to lead deceived individuals into hate and envy. Hitler also used drugs and alcohol to manipulate individuals into joining the nazi forces. Initially it was under the guise of gymnasiums but it was noted that the nazis gave out free drugs to control individuals. Hitler gave out free drugs to youth in order to tempt them to have anger, bitterness, and think that persecution was a viable option. (Hitler was not German and may have been Jewish. Definitely worked for the snake).

Churchill knew that Hitler was deceitful and unethical. Despite Hitler having invaded multiple European countries in 1939 including France and was advancing towards England, Churchill decided to fight Hitler and his nazi forces. There was doubt as to how England could prevent Hitler from advancing, yet Churchill did not cower. Instead of losing hope, Churchill encouraged England and Western Democracy by stating that, "We will never surrender." England fought Hitler and nazism and never surrendered. The US would enter the war in 1941 and supported Democracy against tyranny. Once Hitler had to actually fight military forces instead of persecuting innocent lives, he decided to end it with cyanide pellets commiting suicide. Hitler persecuted German Christians, Catholics, Jewish individuals, and anyone who disagreed with insanity and cowardice seen in nazism. Hitler was judged by King Jesus Christ seeing how he did not live to more than 40 years of life despite having a large army, tanks, bomber planes, informants, and idolatrous sycophants. Meanwhile Churchill became the hero of the Western World and an example of grit and manliness. 

Churchill Criticized and Fought Against Socialism

"Lenin: His sympathies cold and wide as the Arctic Ocean; his hatreds tight as the hangman's noose. His purpose to save the world: his method to blow it up."

"Democracy is the worst system devised by wit of man, except for all the others." (There is definitely sarcasm in the first part of the saying.)

Churchill fought against nazi socialism and helped the West understand the reality of racism and socialism. After the nazi socialists were defeated in the Second World War, soviet socialism began to demonstrate that it also was not trying to help individuals. Churchill again fought against soviet socialism and described the truth of the lying doctrine. Churchill criticized and showed that Lenin was not a good person and was hypocritical. While socialism describes that its intent is to foment peace and prosperity, it actually wants to repress individuality and diversity. Churchill understood this in the 1930s and was able to describe in great detail why democracy may not be perfect yet it is a better option than the worst option possible: socialism.

"Socialism is government of the duds, by the duds, and for the duds."

Churchill was serious in his criticism of socialism. Churchill is also known for having great wit and an amazing sense of humor. He has interesting quotes that describe that socialism should never be idealized acknowledging that Democratic Republics are much better off. Churchill wrote extensively about repudiating socialism in all its forms including nazi socialism and soviet socialism. Churchill described that socialists hate true capitalism because it allows individuals to improve themselves, be happy, and be grateful. Socialists want everyone to be miserable and also want individuals to appreciate being miserable. Socialists do not want others to improve themselves nor help others improve themselves. Churchill described that individuals are meant to get better through healthy competition and empathy seen in true capitalism. Churchill had one of the quickest and most impressive wits being able to repudiate nonsense and envy with humor. 

"The inherent "vice" of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent "virtue" of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

Churchill Was Envied and Opposed by Socialists in the mid 1940s For Fighting Against Socialism

"We must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and the English common law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of Independence... All this means that the people of any country have the right, and should have the power by constitutional action, by free unfettered elections, with secret ballot, to choose or change the character or form of government under which they dwell; that freedom of speech and thought should reign; that courts of justice, independent of the executive, unbiased by any party, should administer laws which have received the broad assent of large majorities or are consecrated by time and custom. Here are the title deeds of freedom which should lie in every cottage home. Here is the message of the British and American people to mankind. Let us preach what we practice-let us practice what we preach."- The Churchill Factor (page 273-274)

"The communist parties, which were very small in all these Eastern States of Europe, have been raised to pre-eminence and power far beyond their numbers and are seeking everywhere to obtain totalitarian control... [with] no true democracy (page 275)

Churchill was also hated by socialists in England in 1945 after helping defeat nazi socialists. Churchill described that socialism was not good and helped no one since 1917 and was opposed by the media in the mid 1940s after helping win World War II. Churchill saw that Stalin was maddened by socialism and began to make contentions to fight socialism in 1945 (Churchill saw that communism corroded the socialists and drove them mad.) Churchill wrote a famous speech about the beauty of Democracy and the vices of socialism in 1945 after the war had been won by the Allied Forces. The media took to oppose Churchill calling Churchill a looney "alarmist" for speaking truth about socialism. In the Soviet Union's newspaper, Pravda (that actually wrote lies), he was slandered as a crazy war monger and nazi racist. Stalin also slandered Churchill for calling out his totalitarianism, racism, and madness in dealing with Germany after World War II. Churchill called out the manner that Germans were being sent out of Poland to Germany based on Stalin's envy and racism. Stalin also wanted to murder Germans arbitrarily after the war had ended and Churchill said no. (The fascists, crazies, and racists are the socialists.) The slander from media was because socialism was beginning to be organized in a manner to oppose Christianity, Democracy, and capitalism in the 1950s during the mid 1940s.  Churchill saw that communism had devastated Germany and was also not what it appeared to be. Churchill described that soviet socialism was attempting to prevent democracy in West Berlin, and Stalin even went so far as to blockade West Germany and prevent resources from entering the city. (The US fought against the blockade by providing needed resources to West Germany through airplane delivery. West Germany was Democratic and capitalistic and hated by Stalin.) Eventually the blockade ended. 

Churchill saw that socialism was not good in the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union "appeared to be improving" while this was only propaganda to bolster the image of socialism. Solzhenytsin described how there was nothing being produced in the Soviet Union and instead the country was grinding to a halt. Churchill knew this and probably saw it too. Churchill was older than 60 years of age and was still speaking truth about the virtues of democracy and the vices of socialism. He kept speaking truth despite having already having won the Second World War. Churchill kept warning the Western Democratic Republics that Stalin and socialism were incompatible with democracy and capitalism. Because he was right, the socialists tried to side line him from prominence by calling him crazy, racist, and a fascist. Churchill kept speaking truth and the socialists slandered and lied about Churchill to prevent socialism from being exposed as a failed religion of envy. (He had helped end nazi socialism and idolators were not happy that he had insight about how soviet socialism was no better.) Socialists attempted to slander and discourage him, yet Churchill kept describing the reality of socialism and coveting.

Quotes from the Churchill Factor by Boris Johnson, Goodreads, and Great British Wit from Rosemarie Jarski

The Creators of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy Films

 The Creators of The Lord of the Rings Trilogy

The films, the Lord of the Rings, were amazing because they were based on the books of J.R.R. Tolkien. Tolkien made amazing books in the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings. The films were impressive because they kept to the books and were made in the 1990s or 2000s prior to the LGBT trying to limit and prevent free speech and the telling of amazing stories (prior to the 2010s). While the Lord of the Rings is fiction, it is an impressive story of bravery and goodness. 

The story describes a battle between good and evil. We learn that an evil individual, Sauron, decided to create rings that contained power. The evil individual wanted to have unlimited power over the whole world. The different rings were combined into one ring that could rule everything. The evil ring gets lost and is found by a hobbit named Bilbo Baggins. Despite Bilbo not being strong, he is able to defeat a dragon and take its treasures. Among the treasures, was the evil ring.

Baggins wears the ring and notices that he becomes invisible. Despite the supposed superpower that the ring provides, Baggins is able to be wise and does not depend on the ring. Baggins lives independent of the ring's seduction for invisibility and power. Baggins has dominion over the ring and lives his life normally. It is until there is war that Baggins understands that the ring is evil and must be destroyed. Since he was advanced in age, he gives the task to Frodo to take the ring and destroy it. Frodo is innocent, positive, good, and brave. Frodo and the Hobbits lived in harmony until the wicked decided to wage war and wanted complete control over everything.

Frodo along with a few other Hobbits do not fear and decide to take the ring to Mordor to destroy it. Frodo is courageous and decides to embark on a journey to rid the Middle Earth of the dreaded evil ring. Frodo has opposition from the wicked, yet decides to persevere with high courage and unwavering determination. The three films are superb and impressive. The ratings were also positive with the original film being given 9 out of 10 stars (the other films also were given great reviews). The films are a cinema masterpiece. The Lord of the Rings describes the beauty of harmony and serenity contrasted to war. Despite the coveting and envy that resulted in war, there were brave individual that fought against tyranny by choosing to practice integrity and goodness. The films and books describe that it is possible to persevere with bravery and courage despite the existence of envy and coveting that is of evil.

 

The Lord of the Rings Describes That There is Power in Self-Restraint and Discipline

While most movies and series attempt to say that might is in muscles and height, the Lord of the Rings describes that there is power in self-control. Frodo is not tall nor muscular yet is powerful because he is able to deny the allure of the evil ring. While most individuals were tempted to wear the ring and thought that the ring gave power, in reality, it was diminishing individuals. The ring gave the ability to be invisible, yet was diminishing the wearer of the ring. Frodo similar to Baggins is able to have self-restraint and is weary of the ring. Frodo is given the mission to reach Mordor that is the territory of Sauron and destroy the ring. Instead of being fearful, Frodo accepts the mission and has healthy skepticism about the temptation of wearing the ring. Frodo is amazing because while he fights different enemies and opposition, he does not get discouraged. Frodo is opposed by Sauron, Sauron's personal army, orcs, giant spiders, and a fake hobbit in Gollum. (Even Frodo had a fake peer.)

Despite the opposition, Frodo persists. While he is tempted to wear the ring, Frodo fights temptation and perseveres with integrity. The ring also lies and tells its wearers that they can become powerful beyond imagination if they only wear the ring. Frodo decides to deny temptation and keeps on his journey. The books and films describe that a human being is far more powerful when he decides to remove sin and perseveres with bravery and integrity. We saw how Gollum was devastated by years of using the ring and believing the lies. Gollum looked withered, bluish purple or gray (almost hypoxic), and paranoic for wearing the evil ring. Frodo persevered without diminishment because he had dominion over the ring. We can persevere denying sin, denying lying temptations, and acknowledge that we do not believe lying propaganda from marxist socialists. We can persevere trusting in GOD Almighty and paying attention to helpful and positive information instead of discouraging and unhelpful infomation that wants to lead to sin. (We can set aside time in the day to read positive information seen in Scripture, Positive Psychology, and amazing individuas who persevered with integrity so that we encourage ourselves. We also must exercise each day minimum 30 minutes each day except Shabbath to boost our immune system. Our immune system gets better with age and is to be trusted over an experimental "vaccine" created in haste and approved in 9 months that lasts 6 months. We can remove any socialist propaganda and distrust socialists since marxists wanted individuals to vaccinate their children including their 6 month olds. Also there is the need to not believe any revilings and insults from marxists who hate Christianity, Democracy, capitalism, discipline, happiness, competition, bravery, goodness, integrity, themselves, their country, and others.)

The Value of Bravery and Courage

The Lord of the Rings describes the importance of bravery and courage despite adversity and opposition. The Lord of the Rings describes how having courage can make a big difference and that cowardice is to be shunned and repudiated. Post-modern media and marxism have tried to make cowardice and vanity seem "cool" yet we know that it is to deceive and lead people to idolatry and negative emotions. The Lord of the Rings described that despite Frodo not being the strongest or tallest, he was courageous. We learn that despite discouragements from the snake, we can keep fighting against corruption, negative emotions, and temporary lies. 

Frodo had stability, bravery, and was able to dominate the negative emotions that Gollum tried to evoke and also did not place on the ring. Frodo was able to keep persevering with determination and discipline. The marxist critics also hate Lord of the Rings because it describes how individuals can make a significant difference by eliminating sin and envy. We learn that Gollum represents intemperance and lack of self-dominion. Even Psychologists have written articles of how addiction and intemperance can be described through Gollum. Gollum was hypocritical, envious, without self-control, consumed by the coveting of the evil ring, deceitful, schizophrenic, and maniacal. Bipolarity can also be explained through Gollum. Gollum was cowardly, unstable, hateful, and bitter. We can learn to be far apart from sin and idol worship and persevere with integrity and discipline. 

The Lord of the Rings Sountrack is Also Amazing

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy also has an amazing sound track with symphony music. The books are amazing, the motion pictures for the Fellowship of the Ring, the Two Towers, and the Return of the King are amazing, and also the soundtrack for the movies. The songs of the Shire are positive and relaxing while the songs for the Two Towers that includes the Battle of Middle Earth are intense. The Return of the King also has an amazing selection of songs. 

There is good symphonic music from amazing films, and we can appreciate good music. There have been great sountracks to movies, and the Lord of the Rings has great and amazing symphonic songs that are elaborate and complex.

Buddy Holly

 Buddy Holly

Buddy Holly was one of the first top rock and roll musicians in the United States. Buddy Holly was impressive for being able to make clean and good rock and roll music without suggesting or alluding to sex, drugs, alcohol, and idol worship. Buddy Holly was young when he became one of the top musicians in the 1950s when Elvis Presley was top rock and roll musician (I don't think Elvis envied Buddy since Elvis also was probably envied by socialists). 

Buddy Holly made top hits in the 1950s with "Every Day" and "That'll be the Day". Buddy Holly was able to be dedicated and motivated that he was one of the top musicians of the 50s. Since his image and lyrics were clean and encouraging, he was probably disliked by socialists and marxists. Buddy Holly changed bands, production studio, and was making new music. Instead of making crude and lascivious discouraging music, he made music with fast rhythm and high beats per minute.

While traveling on an airplane with Mexican American, Ritchie Valens, and other musicians, his plane fell. It is unknown if there was envy and/or racism involved. There were not that many Mexican American top musicians in those times, and Valens was probably envied by racists. Buddy Holly was probably envied by racists for not being a racist, being top musician, and not being a marxist musician. 

Buddy Holly was a good musician that sang well and played the guitar. Holly was probably envied for being talented. Holly's style and discipline was cherished by young Americans. It is possible that he was rising in the music charts and was close to being one of the top musicians at the young age of 22 or 23 (Valens was 18 or 19 when he made the dance hit "La Bamba"). Probably the socialists were envious of amazing talent and sabotaged Buddy's and Valen's plane. (Elvis Presley may have also been envied for having a lot of top hits and movies by the socialists in 1972 and the supposed drug overdose may be questionable.)