Leo Tolstoi
Leo Tolstoi was a Russian writer that was able to write important books about the importance of civility and morality. Leo Tolstoi lived in the time period of Fyodor Dostoevsky and about the time that Lenin and Trotsky were writing their lies about socialism. Leo Tolstoi was an individual that wrote about the importance of having integrity and morality. I have not read books on Tolstoi yet have learned about specific themes and ideas that he talked about. Leo Tolstoi was not a proponent of socialism and is among the Russian writers that composed interesting themes about the importance of civility and morality.
Among the important topics that Leo Tolstoi wrote about includes the Anna Karenina principle that describes the manner that feminists are negative. Leo Tolstoi probably wrote the Anna Karenina principle after feminist women and not righteous women. We have read stories about how both men and women are able to persevere being righteous. This is not about the biological sex of a person and actually about practicing integrity instead of envy and sin. Leo Tolstoi describes the Anna Karenina principle describing how socialist feminists think. The Anna Karenina principle states that if a feminist woman is being courted for a relationship, they will look at the positive qualities and attributes, yet will not appreciate all the qualities unless a man has all the qualities. This describes how feminism teaches women to not have gratitude and instead be negative concerning multiple things. Feminism does not look to help women and instead looks to lead them to negative emotions, envy, ingratitude, and the practice of sin.
The Anna Karenina principle states that if a man were to have nine out of ten qualities, the feminist would not appreciate the positive qualities and instead only focus on the quality that is lacking. This means that instead of appreciating the nine positive qualities, the feminist would care greater about the positive quality that is lacking. This describes how feminists see things through a negative lens. This is interesting since Leo Tolstoi wrote about this in the late 1800s. We learn that Leo Tolstoi was speaking truth because in our times we have seen the manner that socialism and feminism have attempted to cause idolatrous women to practice idol worship, sin, and envy. We have seen multiple examples of feminist women who decided to be adulterous (although in these times it is probably called polyamorism. We learn that not only women practice idol worship because there are also male idolatrous adulterers understanding that idolatry leads to adultery.) However, the important point is to flee idolatry and adultery.
We have seen in the past decade how marxist feminism has caused difficulties for societies because of the negativity and envy that results from idolatry. Leo Tolstoi described the importance of practicing integrity so that society can be stable. We have learned from the previous decade how post-modern society has devolved due to envy, coveting, hate, anger, resentments, and bitterness from idol worship. We can persevere seeing the positive of everything and know that these are not the best of times to start a relationship or have a family. We can be grateful to know that we can be far apart from idolators, adultresses, and adulterers that attempt to lead to sin and idol worship. We can understand that we can persevere being positive and grateful for the favor and blessings that we have instead of negative and envious. We can also choose to avoid false prophets, adultresses, adulterers, and idolators who want other people to also be discouraged, envious, and bitter.
Persevering Far Apart From Feminists and Socialist Enviers
We have seen in the past decade the manner that marxist-feminism and socialism has attempted to cause difficulties in society. We have seen multiple examples of marxist-feminists who acted in negative and hateful manners. There are multiple stories of how feminists in the 2010s began to act out and describe how socialism should be avoided. There were stories of narcissistic feminists who hated on men for no reason and misbehaved.
One story described a feminist who became angry and yelled incessantly after she saw a man who was arguing about the importance of human life. The man had a board with a picture of a baby sleeping that read "All Babies Deserve the Right to Live" to which the feminist became enraged. The feminist yelled and became indignant and kicked the pro-life board while being irrate. Instead of arguing her case or simply not caring about the pro-life message, she decided to be envious and yelled at the man who was arguing peacefully. She described that marxist-feminism looks to cause conflict and hate.
Marxist-Feminists Hate Men
In another story a marxist-feminist decided to take a taxi ride. The marxist-feminist became angry at the taxi driver and decided to rip papers that he had in the back seat of the car. The feminist did not own those papers and decided to rip them. The feminist felt entitled to act out and throw the driver's papers out of the car while yelling and making a scene.
In another story, a group of three feminist women took an uber taxi ride and began to be hostile to the driver. The driver attempted to keep calm while the feminists attempted to berate and annoy the driver. While driving, the feminists began to yell at the driver for trying to work and not paying attention to the feminists. To this, the feminists began to be more hostile and yelled even louder at the driver. The feminists did not apologize and instead continued to act in a hostile manner. These examples among so many other examples describe why we should avoid socialists who are envious and quarrelsome for no reason.
Marxist-Feminism and Ingratitude
Besides marxist-feminists behaving negatively and irresponsibly, they also are prone to ingratitude and infidelity. There are stories of marxist-feminists who left their significant other in order to divorce and marry another individual. There is the story of a woman who married a primary care physician. The feminist would meet a surgeon who was introduced by the first husband. The feminist divorced her first husband in order to marry the surgeon. We learn that marriage is an important institution that needs to be respected. Marriage is a sacred institution that allows for there to be stability in society. Socialism does not want stability and harmony in society by advocating disobedience to the commandments of Moses. Marxist-feminists do not respect marriages and may practice adultery. This is important to note so that we avoid feminists who are adulterous and negative.
Socialism advocates for the practice of adultery and idolatry. We can persevere far apart from idolators, adultresses, and socialists. Besides being negative and envious, feminists may also hate all men. This is because marxist-feminism teaches negative women to hate men for no reason. This would explain why the divorce rate has skyrocketed in the past fifty years consistent with the instructing of socialism since the 1970s and Roe v. Wade. 66% or two out of every three marriages ends in divorce. Socialism also does not care about the family structure. There are statistics about divorces that state that divorces are usually initiated by women. "No fault divorces" have led to increased divorces in the United States and also in other liberal nations. The male usually has to provide alimony payments each month with divorce and statistics state that women usually have custody of the children in 7 out of 10 divorce cases. In 1 out of 10 divorces, the male gets custody of the children. In 2 out of 10 divorces, there is shared custody. There are studies that state that after divorce, the man loses a friend while the woman gains a friend (this statistic describes why socialists are not to be trusted.) These statistics are to describe why it is better to persevere with fidelity to GOD Almighty instead of making fake relationships our everything. This allows us to persevere avoiding negative individuals and obeying the commandments of Moses.
Feminism and Adultery
There are stories of feminists who were idolatrous and adulterous in the 2010s that allowed the reality of feminism to be seen in civil society. The adulterous feminists decided to show their true self. There were publications in Vanity Fair, Cosmopolitan, and Vogue that described that feminists were allowed to have more than two boyfriends at the same time. Feminist writers from those magazines described that feminists needed to be in adulterous relationships with multiple partners at the same time to feel accomplished. While not calling the relationships adulterous, the understanding is that polyamorist relationships are open relationships that are adulterous and non-monogamous.
There was another story of a feminist model who was in a relationship with a soccer player. The soccer player played in a top professional league. While starting and being a good player, the feminist decided to also go out with another member of the same team. Not only was the other soccer player a member of the same team, but was the best friend of the soccer player. The adultress was not satisfied with having one relationship with a top soccer athlete and was in two relationships without telling the first boyfriend. This example describes the ingratitude of feminists who do not appreciate a single monogamous relationship and triangulate causing envy and division. The soccer team was divided once the infidelity was found out, and the team probably did not classify to playoffs. The feminist caused envy and coveting and describes why we should avoid marxist-feminists who are unfaithful and cause division. We also can avoid fake friends who envy and covet. Socialist fake friends actually envy and it is better to be far apart from such people as evidenced from the story of the professional soccer player.
Abusive Feminists
In the 2010s, there were stories of abusive feminists who punched and hit their signifcant other. Usually such stories were not common until the 2010s when there were stories that described that some feminists may have even physically abused their significant other. Such stories describe that relationships should be to help each other and not to diminish each other. If the intention is to cause strife and hate one another, then such relationships are not needed. There were stories of abusive feminists who verbally abused their significant other, yet in the 2010's there were additional stories of abusive feminists who were negative and even hit their boyfriends.
We can persevere avoiding marxist-feminists who hate men and do not look to help their significant other. While the snake says, "Life must be boring for not being in a relationship?" We learn that life is interesting because we choose to have meaning and purpose worshiping the LORD and Creator of everything instead of practicing idolatry. We do not need a relationship in these times that we are living in when there is envy by false prophets, natural disasters, veneral diseases without cure, and famines. We do not need a relationship if it tries to lead to idol worship and far from GOD Almighty. We do not need a relationship when there are abusive feminists who hate men.
The Marxist-Feminist Who Left Her Spouse When He Was Diagnosed With Cancer
There is the story of a marxist-feminist who married her spouse and left her spouse when she found out that he had cancer. Instead of being supportive, she decided to leave her spouse and not want to take care of him. While she did not have to be the nurse taking care of him, she also did not have to leave him. After the bout with cancer, the individual was able to recuperate from the cancer and improve himself being able to get back to work and exercising (the individual was still hated and envied by socialist feminists for being positive. He was able to go back to work and be cheerful while feminists co-workers tried to discourage him. He left that place to work at a more positive place.) The individual had an aggressive form of cancer and was able to recuperate from the cancer despite the spouse having left him.
While the story describes the negativity and parasitism of marxist-feminists, it also describes that individuals do not need a negative, toxic, and materialistic relationship where there is no genuine empathy. The individual was able to keep persevering with happiness despite the feminist wife leaving him and being hated for recuperating from cancer and being positive by feminist co-workers. The individual described that he was grateful for being alive and kept being positive in his life. He did not become bitter and kept providing positivity to individuals. If the soccer player story and the abusive feminist story is not enough evidence, this story should describe the importance of avoiding slimy, slithering snakes.
