Pope John Paul II

 Pope John Paul II 

Interpretacion a otros lenguajes

"In order to set man free from fear of himself, of the world, of others, of earthly powers, of oppressive systems, in order to set him free from every manifestation of a servile fear... it is necessary to pray fervently that He will cultivate in his heart the true fear of GOD, which is the beginning of wisdom."- Crossing the Threshold of Hope (page 228)

Pope John Paul II described the importance of worshiping GOD Almighty with zeal and fidelity. We learn that he was able to be a priest and then was able to be pope in 1978. Pope John Paul II described the importance of obedience to GOD Almighty and also genuine empathy to mankind. We learn that Pope John Paul II preached about the importance of responsibility. While Pope John Paul II preached about the importance of King Jesus Christ and obedience to the commandments, there was opposition from communism and socialism.

"This fear of GOD is the saving power of the Gospel. It is a constructive, never destructive fear."

Pope John Paul II kept preaching and speaking truth even when there was opposition seen in communism. We learn from his book, Crossing the Threshold of Hope, about the opposition that existed in the socialists and communists that did not want him to preach at universities. We learn that even when they attempted to prevent him from preaching and speaking truth, Pope John Paul II persevered preaching Christianity. We learn that Pope John Paul II decided to honor the Creator, GOD Almighty, instead of listening to the discouragements and envy of the communists. We learn that Pope John Paul II was led by the worship of GOD Almighty and not by fear. We learn that instead Pope John Paul II chose to worship GOD Almighty than listen to the discouragements of a flawed communist false belief.

"The fear of GOD creates people who allow themselves to be led by responsibility, by responsible love."

We learn that Pope John Paul II had an assassination attempt in 1981 in Moscow when a sniper rifle bullet hit Pope John Paul II. We learn that Pope John Paul II was able to recover from the assassination attempt and was able to keep preaching truth. We learn that Pope John Paul II even visited the individual that attempted to take his life. Pope John Paul II visited the individual in prison in Moscow. We learn that Pope John Paul II forgave the individual and described the power of forgiveness, genuine empathy, and preaching King Jesus Christ Eternal LORD and Savior. We learn that Pope John Paul II was able to persevere describing that there is no need for negative emotions describing hate, envy, resentments, and bitterness. 

"Responsibility and responsible love creates set apart men and women-true Christians- to whom the future of the world ultimately belongs."

Pope John Paul II kept preaching even after the assassination attempt, and we learned that the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s. We learn that while there are multiple reasons describing why the Soviet Union collapsed, one of the main reasons included the positive example of Pope John Paul II being able to preach the filial love and genuine empathy of Christianity amidst the bitterness and hate that attempted to prevent Pope John Paul II from preaching. We were able to see that love conquers hate and that GOD Almighty is very active in the lives of human beings that are righteous. We learn that Pope John Paul II was able to keep preaching decades later and describes the importance of having zeal, humility, responsibility, and most important of all fidelity to GOD Almighty.

---

Pope John Paul II Described the Importance of Worshiping GOD Almighty and Pacifism

"Buddhism is in large measure an 'atheistic' system. We do not free ourselves from evil through the good that comes from GOD; we liberate ourselves only through detachment from the world, which is bad. The fullness of such detachment is not union with GOD, but what is called nirvana, a state of perfect indifference with regard to the world."

Pope John Paul II described how Buddhism is atheistic because it does not accept the existance of GOD Almighty nor the need to worship the true GOD of gods. Buddhism does not acknowledge the existance of the Creator and LORD of everything, GOD Almighty. Buddhism states that individuals can free themselves and attain enlightenment without GOD Almighty even though GOD Almighty is the source of wisdom and understanding. Buddhism states that the worship of GOD Almighty is not needed and that instead detachment from the world allows for improvement. 

Pope John Paul II described that we do need GOD Almighty to improve and that we free ourselves from evil by worshiping GOD Almighty. We learn that we need GOD Almighty to persevere with righteousness and be pure. We can repudiate self righteousness and wickedness. Without GOD Almighty, there is the false perception that an individual by themselves can attain enlightenment. We learn to persist acknowledging that insight and wisdom are from GOD Almighty. Pope John Paul II kept to his belief in King Jesus Christ while still being a pacifist. Democracy describes how there can be disagreements while still believing in pacifism. (Something that socialism does not understand.)

Pope John Paul II described how Buddhism describes the importance of not coveting yet does not acknowledge that there is a Creator that created the Heavens and the earth and cares about us. While pacifist Buddhism speaks out against envying and coveting, it does not recognize that GOD Almighty exists. We learn that GOD Almighty's creation of the Heavens, the planets, the earth, the sun, moon, and stars, oceans, mountains, and rivers describe that GOD Almighty is aware of everything and creates order in his creation. 

Pacifist Buddhism acknowledges the need to avoid envy and coveting yet does not recognize GOD Almighty being Creator and LORD of all. Hinduist Buddhism is idolatrous and even attempts to lead to illicit drug use. In university, there was a Hinduist Buddhist who was handing out Hinduist Buddhism propaganda, and I noticed that the book was quite lengthy and had idols in the cover of the book. I denied having a copy of the book since I knew that there is idolatrous Hinduist Buddhism that instructs idol worship that is very similar to Hinduism. (Buddhism offers greater autonomy than Hinduism due to the caste system. Many individuals in India and Southeast Asia prefer Buddhism to Hinduism because Hinduism attempts to cause inequality through caste systems. Christianity has also increased tremendously over the past centuries seeing how individuals obtain eternal salvation and true autonomy.) While pacifist Buddhism does not offer eternal salvation, it does instruct the need to not covet and practice pacifism. Pope John Paul II was able to keep fidelity to King Jesus Christ while preaching pacifism and serenity among individuals of other religions. Even Buddhist monks respected and admired Pope John Paul II for preaching harmony. This is because Christianity gives autonomy to individuals to decide if they want to accept King Jesus Christ or not. Christianity does not force anyone to worship by force. Eternal salvation in King Jesus Christ is most important. Yet when comparing Buddhism, Pacifist Buddhism is better than Hinduist Buddhism.

Pope John Paul II Described How the Tao Instructs Morality

"They are systems of worship [Confucianism and Taoism] and also ethical systems, with a strong emphasis of good and evil. Tao means eternal truth-something similar to the "Word"-which is reflected in the actions of man by means of truth and moral good. The religions of the Far East contributed greatly to the history of morality and culture, forming a national identity in the Chinese, Indians, Japanese, and Tibetans, and also in the peoples of Southeast Asia and the archipelagoes of the Pacific Ocean."

The Tao is a philosophy that describes the importance of pacifism and morality. The Tao describes that individuals should live in harmony with others instead of causing conflict. The Tao was important in specific regions of China and Asia because of its instruction of morality. The Tao describes that there is good and evil and that individuals should strive to be good. Evil should be disdained and avoided. The Tao allowed individuals to understand the importance of goodness and empathy. It is possible that Taoists became Christians seeing that Tao pacifism and morality is supplementary to Christianity. The Tao taught goodness and ethics. 

It is noted that Christianity instructs us to be ethical and avoid iniquity. Christianity also tells us to practice pacifism and empathy. We choose to obey GOD Almighty yet there are philosophies that can be supplementary to Christianity. Stoicism preaches removal of negative emotions such as anger and envy. Pacifist Buddhism preaches the need to avoid materialism and coveting. We can choose to persevere practicing empathy and seeing the good in life. We can avoid idolatry. We should avoid negativity, negative emotions, conflict, unnecessary quarreling, division, hate, anger, envy, and iniquity that is the source of unhappiness and difficulties on earth. Idol worship is what causes unhappiness and difficulties on earth. That is why we worship GOD Almighty. While we prefer Christianity over everything, we can see that there are pacifist religions and philosophies that do not preach envy and malice seen in socialism. 

"Christ came into the world for all these peoples. He redeemed them all and has His own manner of reaching each of them in the present eschatological phase of salvation history. In fact, in those regions, many accept Him and many more have an implicit faith in Him (Hebrews 11:6)."

Pope John Paul II Rebuked Gnosticism and New Age False Doctrines

"A separate issue is the return of ancient gnostic ideas under the guise of the so-called New Age. [Gnosticism]... taking the shape of a philosophical movement... in distinct, if not declared, conflict with all that is essentially Christian."- (page 90)

Pope John Paul II rebuked false doctrines in the past century and throughout his preaching. Pope John Paul II rebuked the false doctrine of Gnosticism that is false "knowledge" that appears to be real knowledge and wisdom. Gnosticism states that "a god" exists but denies King Jesus Christ, Scripture, obedience to the commandments, and truth. Gnosticism is a heresy that is incompatible with true Christianity. The false belief attempts to discourage from the real faith deceiving individuals into thinking that paganism and lies are truth. Pope John Paul II described that Scripture tells the truth and false doctrines like Gnosticism and New Age should be avoided and rebuked. 

The New Age false belief looks to deceive individuals into thinking that they are gods and is idolatry (similar to Hinduist Buddhism). New Age was promoted since the 1950s but gained popularity with socialist idolators in the 60s and 70s. New Age preached "peace and love" while fomenting hate, anger, division, sin permissiveness, and fornication. New Age is essentially the religion of the hippies and beats repackaged through deceit into making people think that it is "pacifism". New Age is self worship and leads to hostilities, envy, homosexuality, illicit drug use, slothfulness, narcissism, deceit, and hate. New Age says that there is no need to worship GOD Almighty and instead there is the need for self worship. That is idolatry. The practice of idolatry does not lead to pacifism nor living in harmony with others. Idolatry leads to bitterness and persecution of the righteous. New Agers work for the snake also.

Pope John Paul II Described That the Worship of GOD Almighty Allows Us to Free Ourselves From the Chains of Sin and Idol Worship

“Original sin attempts, then, to abolish fatherhood, destroying its light which permeate the created world, placing in doubt the truth about GOD who is Love and leaving man only with a sense of the master-slave relationship.”- (page 228)

Pope John Paul II described how the truth of Scripture describing the importance of worshiping GOD Almighty above everything allows us to be freed from the temporary lies of the snake. We learn that the snake attempts to tempt to the practice of sin and vices while promising “freedom” and “autonomy”. This is with the intention to lead to captivity and darkness. We learn that the snake states blatant lies that GOD Almighty is authoritarian and arbitrary. We know that we can guard our heart and mind against such lies because we know that GOD Almighty is not authoritarian nor arbitrary. Pope John Paul II described how the snake wants individuals to think that instead of the relationship with GOD Almighty being that between a Loving Father and a child, it is that of a master and slave. This is an obvious lie that speaks about the projections of the snake.

We are able to free ourselves from the temporary lies of evil by choosing to persevere in the worship of GOD Almighty. We learn that the snake tells lies seen in the story of Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, Job, and Paul. We learn that if the snake is talking it is telling temporary lies. We learn that Pope John Paul II describes that the fear of the LORD allows us to persevere with true freedom and autonomy that prevents us from practicing sin and vices. We learn that the practice of sin and idol worship leads to the shackles of vices that lead to difficulties, negative emotions, and the destruction of the unrepentant wicked. We learn that Pope John Paul II spoke truth about how we can free ourselves and persevere being freed of fear, envy, anger, and coveting by choosing to worship GOD Almighty. 

Filial Love in King Jesus Christ

"Man is set free through love, because love is the source par excellence of all that is good.”- (page 226)

We learn from Pope John Paul II that we are able to persevere being freed from the fear of death and of evil by choosing to worship GOD Almighty. We choose to worship GOD Almighty and fear the King of kings, King Jesus Christ. We learn that King Jesus Christ has the keys of death and hades and decides the fate of individuals in this life and in the next. For this reason, we can persevere with courage and boldness preaching King Jesus Christ Eternal LORD and Savior. We learn that the fear of GOD Almighty sets us free from the fear of death. We learn that King Jesus Christ has eternal authority.

We learn that love conquers hate and is able to help us persevere. King Jesus Christ is the infinite and eternal love of GOD Almighty for humanity allowing us to have eternal salvation and also love. We learn that the things of the world want there to be hate and lust instead of love. We learn that perfect love casts out all fear meaning that there is no fear in the love of King Jesus Christ. We learn that Pope John Paul II helped us know that if we live our lives in the worship of King Jesus Christ, we are set free from fear. We can avoid false apostles and false prophets who want to lead to captivity, darkness, and fear through hate and lust.

The Right to Life

"For man, the right to life is the fundamental right. And yet, part of contemporary culture has wanted to deny that right, turning it into an "uncomfortable" right, one that has to be defended. But there is no other right that so closely affects the very existence of the person! The right to live means the right to be born and then persevere to live..."- Crossing the Threshold of Hope (page 204-205)

Pope John Paul II described the importance of fighting for the right of human life. We learn that Pope John Paul II fought for the rights of newborns and the importance of obeying the commandments. We learn that the socialists and communists opposed Pope John Paul II attempting to prevent him from preaching in the universities of Poland. Pope John Paul II also described that the media attempted to argue against pro-life arguments with the intention to lead to the use of abortions in cases of unwanted pregnancies in the 1980s. We learn that Pope John Paul II fought against these irresponsible and foolish arguments that attempted to lead individuals to think that abortions are an option. Pope John Paul II fought against abortions and the killing of innocent unborn human life. 

"The question of conceived and unborn children is a particularly delicate yet clear problem. The legalization of the termination of pregnancy is none other than the authorization given to an adult, with the approval of an established law, to take the lives of children yet unborn and thus incapable of defending themselves. It is difficult to imagine a more unjust situation, and it is very difficult to speak of obssession in a matter such as this, where we are dealing with a fundamental imperative of every good conscience-the defense of the right to life of an innocent and defenseless human being. Often the question is presented as a women's right to free choice regarding the life already existing inside her, that she carries in her womb: the woman should have the right to choose between giving life or taking it away from the unborn child. Anyone can see that the alternative here is only apparent. It is not possible to speak of the right to choose when a clear moral evil is involved, when what is at stake is the commandment Do not kill!"- (page 205)

Pope John Paul II did not waver in his commitment to speak truth and is one of the reasons why the socialists and communists did not like Pope John Paul II. We learn that Pope John Paul II kept preaching and writing truth that led to individuals learning about the filial love and genuine empathy that exists in the worship of GOD Almighty. We learn that Christianity describes the importance of human life and that each individual has the right to live based on the commandments of Moses. We learn that the socialists kept attempting to persecute Pope John Paul II and when they could not prevent him from preaching, they attempted to assassinate him. Yet, he was able to persevere preaching, writing, and worshiping GOD Almighty recuperating from the gun shot wound of a socialist. Pope John Paul II did not become resentful or discouraged and instead persevered with high courage and unbreakable valor.  

Guarding Human Rights and Fighting Against Disinformation and Deceit

"What are the human rights? It is evident that these rights were inscribed by the Creator in the order of creation, so we can not speak of concessions on the part of human institutions, on the part of states and international organizations. The Gospel is the fullest confirmation of all of human rights. Without it we can easily find ourselves be far from the truth about man."- (page 197)

We are able to understand that socialism and communism does not offer much to individuals seeing the manner that socialists and communists could not stand the reality of Pope John Paul II preaching truth, logic, wisdom, and filial love. We learn that he fought for the life of the unborn and even went through persecution for his faith. This allows us to understand why we can not be a part of evil, tyranny, and deceit that attempts to prevent individuals from seeing the beauty and wonders that GOD Almighty is able to accomplish. We learn that Pope John Paul II was able to help individuals realize that GOD Almighty is a loving Father who cares about humanity. We learn that GOD Almighty wants to help us persevere and that we can not believe the temporary lies of the snake that want to cause negative emotions and resentment to lead to disobedience. 

"The Redeemer confirms human rights simply by restoring the fullness of the dignity man received when GOD created him in His image and likeness."- (page 197)

In the 1990s and 2000s after the collapse of the Soviet Union, there were also preachers and pastors that described how they attempted to preach in churches and how there was opposition. Despite the opposition, preachers described that they would be able to preach in churches in Russia and different nations that were formerly of the Soviet Union, and described how GOD Almighty allowed them to persevere speaking truth amidst hate and envy from false apostles and idolators that did not want preachers to speak truth. We learn that Pope John Paul II gave us an important example of how we can persevere with bravery and courage despite opposition, persecution, and envy.

Pope John Paul II Described That Christianity Allows Civilization to Improve and Exist

"Western civilization which is marked by a positive approach to the world, and which developed thanks to the achievements of science and technology, two branches of knowledge rooted both in the ancient Greek philosophical tradition and in Judeo-Christian revelation. The truth about GOD the Creator of the world and about Christ the Redeemer is a powerful force which inspires a positive attitude toward creation and provides a constant impetus for its transformation and perfection."

Pope John Paul II described how civiliation exists due to the genuine empathy that exists in Christianity. We learn that GOD Almighty is the source of wisdom and who allows us to improve ourselves in the worship of GOD Almighty. We learn that not only individuals improve but cities and nations can improve in the worship of GOD Almighty. We learn that schools and churches caused civilization to exist in countries that practiced Christianity (Idolatry hates that people can receive an education and keep learning throughout their lives. Idolatry also hates that individuals can keep fidelity to GOD Almighty and practice genuine empathy instead of envying others and causing strife.) When Christianity was preached in the New World in the late 1400s and early 1500s, individuals and nations improved since they were freed from the caste system that idolatry tries to impose. There were Native Americans who converted to Christianity accepting King Jesus Christ Eternal LORD and Savior, helped build schools and churches, and avoided the idolatry caste system.

"The world which the Christians believe has been created and is sustained by the Creator's love, a world enslaved by sin but liberated by the crucified and Resurrected Christ in order to defeat evil, and destined, according to the divine plan, to be transformed and to reach its fulfillment." (page 89)

In the U.S. Pilgrims fled persecution in England and were also persecuted by hostile Native Americans. The first settlement in Jamestown was destroyed and burned down. It is probable that hostile warring Native Americans who did peyote attacked non-hostile settlers. This did not prevent Pilgrims and Puritans from building additional settlements, practicing their faith, and showing empathy to Native Americans. (Not all Native American tribes were hostile, but there were hostile Native American tribes. There were probably a few tribes that were not hostile described in helpful Native Americans like Sacagewea and her tribe who helped Lewis and Clark in an expedition. However, other tribes may have envied and even attacked peaceful settlers.) Socialists lie saying all Native Americans were peaceful when that is a blatant lie. Socialists also say that all Christians were hostile which is also a blatant lie. Socialists envy that Christianity was preached to the New World, allowed improvements to individuals that converted to Christianity, and the caste system was removed from the New World. Churches, schools, and autonomy improved individual's lives. Christianity improves everyone who worships GOD Almighty with sincerity of heart while idol worship attempts to decrease, stagnate, and enslave individuals and nations that practice grave sin.

Logic and Reason Confirm the Existence of GOD Almighty and Refutes Atheism and Nihilism

"The visible world, in and of itself, can not offer a scientific basis for an atheistic interpretation of reality. Instead, honest reflection does find sufficient elements in the world to arrive at the knowledge of GOD. In this sense the atheistic interpretation of reality is one-sided and tendentious."- (page 198)

Pope John Paul II described that he was able to speak with scientists and professors about the manner that we can understand that GOD Almighty exists. We learn that this wisdom prevents us from believing in false philosophies of hate and lust describing atheism and nihilism that socialism and communism derive from. We learn that Pope John Paul II was able to preach about the manner that atheism does not make much sense from a point of view with logic and reason. We learn that Pope John Paul II described that atheism could not be argued for since there is logical reason and order that confirms the existence and absolute sovereign authority of GOD Almighty. 

"I still remember those discussions. I also participated in many meetings with scientists, in particular with physicists, who, after Einstein, were quite open to a theistic interpretation of the world."- (page 199)

Pope John Paul II described that atheism is very one sided because there is no logic, reasoning, order, or filial love. There is arbitrariness and authoritarianism seen in the past regimes of socialism and communism that have never worked. We learn that we can persevere acknowledging the importance of logic, reasoning, truth, and order that exists. We learn that the creation of the world and the world has order. We know that GOD Almighty has established the order of creation concerning the earth seeing the sun, moon, stars, rivers, oceans, weather, seasons, and even with the planets and the universe. We learn that GOD Almighty established order in creation that allows us to acknowledge with learning and studying science that GOD Almighty is in absolute, infinite, and eternal authority over everything. 

Pope John Paul II Described the Manner that the Fall of the Soviet Union Describes How GOD Almighty is Present in the Lives of Individuals

"By your question you confirm that in the fall of communism the action of GOD has been almost visible in the history of our country." (page 130)

In the 1990's, the Soviet Union collapsed. Pope John Paul II described that with the collapse of the Soviet Union, we were able to see the action of GOD Almighty in the lives of individuals. We learn that Pope John Paul II was important in the faltering of the Soviet Union because of his preaching. We learn that GOD Almighty is very present in the lives of Christians seeing the manner that nazi socialism only lasted thirty years and Soviet socialism only lasted seventy years. While it appeared that socialism was going to lead to difficulties in the 1940s with Hitler, the Allied Forces attacked and destroyed the persecution that the nazi socialists were engaging in. During the 1960-1990s with the Soviet Union, we learned that many nations from the Soviet Union decided to renounce socialism and communism for Christianity and capitalism. We learn that evil attempts to say that GOD Almighty is not present in the lives of individuals, yet with the fall of the Soviet Union, we can acknowledge the power of GOD Almighty. We learn that even the nazi socialists hated the Soviet socialists and the Soviet socialists hated the nazi socialists seen in how Hitler attacked Stalin during Russian winter. We also saw how socialism and communism are not viable forms of governance because it is based on envy and hate. We learn that Pope John Paul II was able to help us acknowledge the power of filial love and genuine empathy. In the 1990s, the Soviet Union faltered and became new nations that embraced Christianity and capitalism. The newer nations decided to renounce the temporary lies and deceit of socialism and communism. 

"In fact, it was Leo XIII who in a certain sense predicted the fall of communism, a fall that would cost humanity and Europe dearly, since the medicine- he wrote in his encyclical of 1891- could prove more deadly than the disease itself." (page 131)

Pope John Paul II described that the supposed solution of socialism was actually worse than the disease. We learn that Pope Leo XIII predicted the fall of communism in the year 1891. While socialism and communism attempt to appear to be a solution to the injustices of hate and envy, it is actually the source of the hate and envy. We learn that idolatry is the source of difficulties, envy, and coveting. We learned from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn about the injustices that occured in Soviet Russia due to the envy and hate of Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, and their sycophantic "comrades" who professed the religion of envy and hate: socialism. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described the gulag system and the false accusations that led to loyal citizens and soldiers being sent to gulag for essentially being rational, civil, and truthful. We learned about a business owner who was arrested and sent to gulag for failing to keep applauding Stalin for more than ten minutes. The interrogator gave the business owner the suggestion and life advice to "never be the first to stop applauding." This describes the tyranny and totalitarianism that exists in socialism and communism and why we should keep persevering worshiping the true GOD of gods, GOD Almighty. While socialism and communism state that they are attempting to produce utopias, we know that the reality is very different. The supposed "utopias" without GOD Almighty end up being totalitarian stagnated dystopias. 

Pope John Paul II Preached Genuine Empathy

Pope John Paul II was respected and cherished by Catholics, Protestants, and Christian believers alike. Pope John Paul II was sincere and preached filial love and genuine empathy. This was seen in how he cared about individuals and was not fake. Believers saw that and admired Pope John Paul II for his honesty and commitment to true fraternity. Even Evangelicals respected and admired Pope John Paul II for preaching sound doctrine and fighting against socialism. It is noted that not only Christians admired Pope John Paul II but also individuals from other beliefs for being an example of genuine empathy. While Pope John Paul II did not lie and stated that King Jesus Christ is the only manner to obtain salvation, he was not hostile and hypocritical. While only King Jesus Christ allows us to have eternal salvation, GOD Almighty gives individuals autonomy to decide if they want to believe in King Jesus Christ or not. 

Pope John Paul II still sought harmony and serenity between individuals without compromising his faith in King Jesus Christ. Everyone respected Pope John Paul II. The only individuals that disdained Pope John Paul II were the socialists because individuals were believing in King Jesus Christ with fervor. The socialists envied and slandered Pope John Paul II for being righteous, faithful, zealous, and humble. Despite persecution, Pope John Paul II did not falter nor fear and kept preaching truth. Pope John Paul II also traveled often to Mexico where he was cherished for being humble and honest. Being both Polish and Jewish, Pope John Paul II described the need to persevere with goodness and remove hate and racism. Pope John Paul II rebuked socialism in all its forms. He described the need for empathy and unity between Catholics and Jewish individuals in the 1980s. (Although in the times that we are living in, there are fake catholics and fake jewish individuals who are actually socialists. We can practice healthy skepticism.) When Pope John Paul II was asked for an interview and was not able to make the interview, he told the journalist to write questions that he had about the faith. While being Pope and having multiple commitments, Pope John Paul II wrote back to the journalist. The book Crossing the Threshold of Hope were the answers that Pope John Paul II wrote describing that he cared about helping others increase their faith. Everyone from the grandparents generation to the younger generations appreciated Pope John Paul II. Only the socialists despised such a great example of filial love and genuine empathy. We can remind ourselves of positive examples that proclaimed King Jesus Christ with their words and their actions. We can also avoid socialists.

Figures of History and Individualism allows us to persevere knowing that throughout history there have been righteous individuals that decided to practice good and not practice sin. We are able to persevere knowing that there is no need to fear nor have negative emotions knowing that we trust in the Creator and not in idolatry. We are able to learn about righteous individuals that decided to speak truth and help others even when there are lies being told that attempt to lead individuals to disobedience and the practice of sin. We can persevere without practicing sin and idol worship.

Literary Review of Overdo$ed America

 Literary Review of Overdo$ed America

Overdo$ed America written by Dr. Abramson describes how the pharmaceutical companies had created a monopoly through compromising medical journal articles, promoting newer and more expensive dangerous medications, and affecting the doctor patient relationship negatively through false advertisements (seen in Claritin). Dr. Abramson's book is a great work on medical ethics. The book details how it is possible to be ethical in medicine despite the corruption and deceit that has increased since the 1980s and 1990s. With pharmaceutical companies and health insurance companies attempting to take autonomy from primary care physicians since the 1980s, Dr. Abramson describes how it is still possible to remain ethical and moral by choosing to not be a part of corruption and deceit.

We learn that there is always a choice to remain ethical and practice integrity. There is the choice to persevere with morality despite the temporary lies of the snake that says, "Everyone sins. Why not sin and be like everyone else?" We can choose to avoid the lies of the snake knowing that there are individuals that are good and practice integrity. We do not need to believe the temporary lies of the snake that envies when individuals worship GOD Almighty. We choose to remain ethical and speak out against corruption especially when it attempts to promote faulty "medications" and "vaccines". We can choose to avoid adverse experimental "vaccines" and expose corruption.

Medical Advancements in the Early and Mid 1900s and Decreased Medical Care Quality in the 1980s

Dr. Abramson described how there have been substantial medical advances in the US since the 1900s. There have been great medications and treatments created since the beginning of the 20th century. Dr. Abramson offers constructive criticism concerning how medicine has been commercialized since the 1980s and resulted in the decreased quality of medical care. This is interesting because science is a tool that can be used to help individuals and patients instead of leading to poor health outcomes including heart attacks, strokes, osteoporosis, and falls. There have been great innovations in medicine such as the Polio vaccine that was created in the 1950s by the healthy competition of Dr. Salks and Dr. Sabin that resulted in the decrease of polio cases and lower limb paralysis. The cardiopulmonary bypass machine has helped with surgery in the 1950s. Coronary artery bypass graft surgeries also were successful in the 1960s to remove blocked arteries. 

Dialysis machines created in the 1960s have helped individuals with chronic kidney disease. Hip and knee replacement surgeries allow for increased mobility for patients. There have been medical innovations such as Dr. Debackey's heart surgery inventions that have helped patients survive heart surgery. Izoniazid and streptomycin were antibiotic treatments that helped against bacterial infections. Tagamet was created in 1977 and helped against ulcers. Zantac was later created and approved because it caused less side effects than Tagamet. Prilosec OTC was later approved being better, cheaper, and without the need of a prescription compared to Zantac. Medical innovations and inventions have helped patients. Despite great innovations, medical care quality has decreased since the 1980s due to socialism's attempts to corrupt medical research, the medical supplies industry, and medicine. Socialism has attempted to decrease the quality of medical innovations seen most obviously with the covid experimental "vaccine" in 2019, yet even newer, expensive medications approved in the 1980s (including statins) can cause adverse health effects. Surveys and statistics have described how the quality of medical care in the US has decreased. It is most likely because of corruption and socialism (monopoly "capitalism") The quality of health care has decreased due to the decreased autonomy of physicians since the 1980s seen in how insurance companies have tried to usurp authority, and socialists have fought against H.M.O. plans that were actually suppressing the cost of medical care. H.M.O. plans were actually cost effective in the 1980s and also gave physicians autonomy to practice. Because H.M.O.s were cost effect and not allowing medical costs to balloon to double digits, socialists slandered and lied about cost saving H.M.O.s with great physicians who were preventing a rising cost of medical care while providing great medical care quality in primary care.

"Then I saw an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, in July 2000, claiming that 'the U.S. population does not have anywhere near the best health in the world.'"- (page 44-45)

"The low ranking of Americans' health reported in this article was so disparate from what I had believed that I started to look for other sources of comparitive data to see if this was right. An extensive comparison of the health of the citizens of industrialized countries done by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) confirmed the conclusions presented in Dr. Starfield's article. The United States again ranked poorly, with 18 industrialized countries having greater life expectancy."- (page 45)

"Children born in the United States today can expect to live the equivalent of about 69.3 healthy years of life, while children born in the other 22 industrialized countries can expect an average of 2.5 additional years of healthy life."- (page 46)

Corruption in Medicine in the 1940s

"Estrogen was approved by the FDA in 1942 for the treatment of symptoms associated with menopause." -(page 59)

"Clearly, restricting the use of Estrogen to women with troublesome menopausal symptoms limited its potential market greatly. If more drugs were to be sold, new reasons to take estrogen would have to be found."- (page 60)

"Estrogen became the most frequently prescribed drug in the United States in 1966. It remained one of the most frequently prescribed drugs through 1975."- (page 62)

It is difficult to pinpoint when medicine began to be corrupted. In the 1940s, there was a case of corruption when a corrupt physician, Dr. Wilson, decided to publish a book and an article in a medical journal about how estrogen replacement therapy helped women with menopause and also prevented "breast and gential cancer" in 1962. Combined estrogen therapy was marketed as supposedly helping decrease cervical cancer (1979), heart attacks (1985), strokes, and improved overall health.

"In a 1962 article published in JAMA, Dr. Wilson, a gynecologist, reported the results of a study in which 304 women had been treated with estrogen. Though 18 cancers were predicted over the time that the women had been taking estrogen, none developed."- (page 60)

"Perhaps Wilson's own tongue had been sharpened by the support his foundation was receiving from several drug companies, including the manufacturer of estrogen. In 1965 the Wilson Research Foundation received $34,000 (the equivalent of about $175,000 in 2004 dollars) in contributions from drug companies, enough to cover Wilson's expenses while he was writing his book. In total, Wilson's foundation received $1.3 million from drug companies."- (page 60)

Dr. Wilson had financial ties with pharmaceutical companies (Wyeth-Ayerst) who paid him to promote estrogen replacement therapy. It was noted in the 2000s that estrogen replacement therapy increases cancer incidence in women 8% for every year that they take estrogen. Dr. Wilson did not describe the risk of cancer in the 1940s despite there probably being cases. 

It was not until 2003 and 2004 that new studies described that taking estrogen replacement therapy causes cancer, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and heart attacks. It is possible that estrogen replacement therapy was marketed as an amazing treatment by pharmaceutical companies since the 1940s as population control. Socialists hate that the population size keeps growing and probably falsely marketed estrogen replacement therapy as a good treatment in the 1940s without real scientific evidence. A lying journal article and a lying book were used to promote cancer causing medication to women in the 1940s. It took 60 years to find out that estrogen replacement therapy actually caused adverse health effects. (Covid experimental "vaccines" may not be good vaccinations either despite lies from socialist propaganda.)

It seems that because American industriousness and ethics allowed for innovations in medicine since the 1900s, socialists wanted to prevent such great medical care and advancements starting in 1942 with false lying information published about estrogen replacement therapy. Initially, it was stated that estrogen replacement therapy prevented cancer while actually causing different types of cancer, strokes, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Researchers published medical journal articles in 1975 that described that estrogen replacement therapy caused cancer. Taking estrogen replacement therapy increased the risk of cancer 14 times after seven years of treatment. Yet another lying article stated that adding progestin hormone to estrogen therapy prevented cancer. This was probably to protect sales of estrogen replacement therapy in 1979.

"In December 1975, two articles published in NEJM showed that estrogen therapy increased the risk of cancer of the lining of the uterus (endometrial cancer), up to 14-fold after seven years of treatment. This fear was quashed when, four years later, in 1979, an article published in the Lancet showed that adding another hormone, progestin, for about 10 days each month to estrogen therapy prevented the changes in the lining of the uterus that predisposed to cancer. Several other studies soon confirmed that progestin protected women on estrogen therapy from developing endometrial cancer. Still, HRT had been linked with cancer in the public's mind, and sales plummeted. Only half as many prescriptions for Estrogen were filled in 1980 as had been filled in 1975."-(page 62)

"An aggressive drug rehabilitation program was needed. 'Marketing a disease is the best way to market a drug.'"- (page 62) [Osteoporosis was marketed as a disease that could be improved with estrogen replacement therapy in 1986.]

Since individuals were realizing that estrogen may have caused cancer in 1975, the socialists decided to rehabilitate the medication by marketing osteoporosis as another disease that can be treated with estrogen. Before 1985, few people had heard about osteoporosis being a deadly disease. Osteoporosis was marketed heavily in the 1980s as a dangerous disease for women that could lead to falls and fractures in order to sell estrogen since sales had plummeted in the 1970s. It is possible that the disease was heavily marketed to increase sales of estrogen. 

"And osteoporosis or thinning of the bones was a perfect disease to market: there are no symptoms until you develop fractures, so no postmenopausal woman could be sure she was safe. And the criteria were set so that one quarter of all women over 65, and more than half over 75, would be diagnosed with the disease if they had bone density tests. There was, however, a lot of work to be done to turn osteoporosis from part of the normal spectrum of skeletal aging into a feared disease."- (page 62)

Osteoporosis may have been marketed in advertising by pharmaceutical companies in medical journal ads, funded medical meetings, and lectures about osteoporosis to make osteoporosis a feared disease and cause estrogen sales to increase again. The pharmaceutical industry did not care about the health of women, and instead chose to market a non-existent disease (osteoporosis is actually normal in the aging process and improves with exercise and nutrition) that caused the prescribing of estrogen therapy. This may have led to numerous cases of heart attacks, strokes, cancers, and Alzheimer's disease to women. This was while it was known in 1975 that estrogen therapy caused cancer. The pharmaceutical companies marketed a drug that was known to cause cancer in 1975. 

"The next step was to 'educate' the public. In 1985, only 23 percent of women had heard of osteoporosis. But, according to US News and World Report, that changed quickly as the result of the efforts of Burson-Marsteller, the public relations firm hired by Wyeth-Ayerst. The campaign was successful at increasing public concern (some would say unnecessary fear), generating many articles in women's magazines and culminating in National Osteoporosis Week. The National Osteoporosis Foundation was started with drug company support in 1986. Doctors and patients came to fear that undiagnosed osteoporosis would lead to hip bones' suddenly snapping with minimal trauma, though in more than 20 years as a busy family doctor I never saw such a thing."

The pharmaceutical companies caused for estrogen to be seen as a good treatment to osteoporosis by helping create disinformation in ads, National Osteoporosis Week, and even the National Osteoporosis Foundation to educate women on the need to take estrogen. The pharmaceutical companies followed the disinformation about osteoporosis with additional lies that estrogen replacement therapy prevented heart attacks while actually causing heart attacks. The prescribing of estrogen increased to its 1975 high prescription levels in 1992 through lies and deceit and may be responsible for adverse health outcomes further described in randomized controlled studies in 2004.

"Coinciding with the public's "education" about osteoporosis was a 1985 report in NEJM about the positive effect of estrogen on the risk of heart disease. More than 30,000 postmenopausal women participating in the Nurse's Health Study, which followed the women for more than three years, showed that nurses who were currently using estrogen had 70 percent less risk of developing coronary heart disease than women who had not used hormones-a dramatic finding."- (page 63) [Another lying article published in a medical journal about estrogen therapy decreasing heart attack risk after sales had decreased.]

"By 1992, estrogen sales were topping their 1975 peak."

"One out of five postmenopausal women in the United States was taking hormones. The prestigious American College of Physicians issued guidelines to practicing physicians recommending that 'all women... should consider preventive hormone therapy,' and that 10 to 20 years of therapy were recommended for 'maximum benefit'. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology also recommended that all postmenopausal women, barring a medical contraindication like breast cancer, should take HRT for life. Bolstered by the recommendations of these professional organizations, estrogen use increased another 40 percent over the next three years. In 1995 estrogen once again became the most frequently prescribed brand-name drug in the United States. Perhaps the strongest evidence supporting routing HRT was presented in a 1997 article published in NEJM showing that 'mortality among women who use postmenopausal hormones is lower than among nonusers,' again overriding continuing concerns about the link to breast cancer."- (page 64)

After promoting estrogen as a treatment for osteoporosis and prevention of heart attacks, sales of estrogen increased. In 1992, one out of five women were taking estrogen replacement therapy even after studies in 1975 described that estrogen replacement therapy caused cancer. This was due to the advertisements placed in medical journals and lying medical journal articles published in 1979 and 1985. Not only the pharmaceutical companies created the Osteoporosis Foundation to promote estrogen as a treatment for osteoporosis, but they also told the American College of Physicians and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology to promote estrogen replacement therapy. In 1997, another lying article was published in the NEJM stating that women who took estrogen replacement therapy had lower mortality rates. It was not until the year 2000 that truthful journal articles described the risk of increased cancer incidence of women who took estrogen replacement therapy. Instead of helping women be healthier, estrogen replacement therapy caused increased mortality rates in postmenopausal women. 

"It is amazing that before 1998, not one of the claims supporting the benefits of HRT had been substantiated by large randomized control trials."- (page 66)

"The Nurses' Health Study was the source of the data for the 1997 NEJM article showing a lower mortality rate among women taking HRT. This benefit of HRT lasted for up to five years after woman stopped taking the therapy, but after five years they had a 16 percent increase in their death rate compared with women who had never taken hormones. These contradictory findings deserved a lot more attention that they got at the time. Why did the nurses experience a lower death rate while they were taking hormones, and for five years after they stopped? And why did they go on to experience a significantly higher death rate than women who had never been on HRT?" -(page 66) [1997 NEJM article describing that estrogen replacement therapy lowered mortality rate for five years then increased mortality rate after five years.]

The reasoning to why some women had decreased mortality rates while taking estrogen replacement therapy was that the warning label of estrogen therapy described that women with heart disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes were not supposed to take estrogen therapy. This could mean that women who were healthier and had not started estrogen replacement therapy did not have chronic disease such as heart disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes. 

"Dr. Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, a professor at the University of California, San Diego, points out that while the observational studies of HRT were going on, doctors across the country knew, from estrogen product labeling (included in the Physicians' Desk Reference), that woman with a history of heart disease, high blood pressure, or diabetes should not be treated with estrogen. This would contribute to the spurious findings in the observational studies that women who took hormones had less heart disease. Of course they did: Not only were they the type of women who were going to be healthier; the women taking hormones had already been screened to exclude those with heart disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes. The observational studies that found that estrogen decreased the risk of heart disease had not, according to Dr. Barrett-Connor, adequately adjusted for this." -(page 67)

After they stopped taking estrogen replacement therapy (after five years), they began to develop chronic disease and an increase incidence of mortality rates. This means that estrogen replacement therapy actually caused increased adverse health effects in healthy post-menopausal women taking estrogen replacement therapy for multiple years. However, these findings were not considered significant and estrogen kept being prescribed and sold in pharmacies in the 1990s. Also the studies were observational and not randomized controlled studies. (Observational studies are not the best type of studies because they can have significant bias compared to randomized controlled trials.) The observational studies may have been biased to make it appear that estrogen replacement therapy was beneficial to women (the women did not have chronic disease and were healthier), while not explaining the increased mortality rate after women stopped taking estrogen for multiple years (healthy women then had heart attacks and adverse heart disease).

In the 1990s, the pharmaceutical company Wyeth-Ayerst requested the FDA to approve estrogen for the prevention of heart disease in postmenopausal women. This was when there were only biased observational studies and no randomized controlled trials. The FDA did not approve estrogen treatment for the prevention of heart disease in postmenopausal women in the 1990s. This was because there were no randomized controlled trials demonstrating that estrogen therapy was effective at preventing heart disease. Pharmaceutical companies probably wanted to increase drug sales while disregarding the health risks such medication caused. Estrogen had not been completely studied and researched since the 1940s when the medication was approved for postmenopausal symptoms in postmenopausal women. (There is the need to be skeptical of untested and unresearched medication and "vaccines".)

"In 1998 the results of the first randomized controlled clinical trial of HRT were published. This manufacturer-sponsored study showed that despite significantly lowering LDL (bad) cholesterol and raising HDL (good) cholesterol, HRT increased women's risk of heart disease by 50 percent in the first year. And over the four years of the study, treatment with hormones provided no reduction in the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. In fact, this study showed that the overall death rate was not lower in the women who took hormones; it was slightly higher."

It was noted in 1998 and in the 2000s in medical journal articles that combined estrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy caused worsening health effects such as heart attacks and strokes. It is questionable how estrogen therapy could have been promoted on medical journals, books, magazines, and commercials for so long while actually leading to cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and even dementia. Even in 2000 when a journal article published in JAMA showed an 8 percent increase in breast cancer in women every year that combined estrogen replacement therapy was taken, doctors continued to prescribe combined hormone replacement therapy. In 2001, despite a new journal article describing that combined estrogen replacement therapy causes cancer, estrogen was the third most prescribed medication in the US. That was after journal articles published in 1975, 1998, and 2000 showed significant adverse health effects in postmenopausal women taking combined estrogen replacement therapy. It was not until 2004 that estrogen and combined estrogen replacement therapy was repudiated as a treatment due to multiple scientific studies with randomized control trials. (There is the need for healthy skepticism with new medications and "vaccines".)

"The truth about HRT came out very slowly and was difficult for most doctors to accept. Even after the article appeared in JAMA in 2000 showing the 8 percent per year increase in the risk of breast cancer in women taking combined hormone therapy, most experts continued to recommend, and most doctors continued to prescribe, routine hormone replacement for postmenopausal women. In 2001, estrogen was still the third most frequently prescribed drug in the United States."- (page 68)

"[Article in July 2002] The study found a statistically significant increase (15 percent) in the overall frequency of adverse events in the women taking HRT compared with the women who took a placebo. This translated into about one adverse event for every 100 women who took hormones for five years. The data and safety monitoring board of the study determined that the increased frequency of complications in women who had taken HRT instead of a placebo had 'crossed the designated boundary... of a finding of overall harm,' and that it was no longer ethical to continue the study knowing that the women taking HRT were going to be harmed more than helped." -(page 69)

"The newspapers were full of articles about the government-sponsored Women's Health Initiative study, which had been specifically designed to determine whether routine HRT was beneficial for postmenopausal women. The 16,000 women in the study had been randomly assigned to take either (estrogen and progestin) HRT or placebo. The study had been scheduled to run through 2005, but the women received letters instructing them to stop taking the study medication because the risk (increase in breast cancer, heart attack, stroke, and blood clots) associated with combined HRT had been found to be significantly greater than the benefit (decrease in hip fractures and colon cancers). The study found a statistically significant increase (15 percent) in the overall frequency of adverse events in the women taking HRT compared with the women who took a placebo." -(page 69)

"In May 2003 more results from the Women's Health Initiative were published showing that combined HRT not only did not prevent Alzheimer's disease, but actually doubled the risk of developing dementia (primarily Alzheimer's disease) in women aged 65 and older, causing about 1 additional case of dementia for every 100 women treated with HRT for five years." 

"[Another study with sample size of 1 million described increased cancer in the women taking combined estrogen replacement therapy.] The results showed that women who were currently taking hormones had a 66 percent higher chance of getting breast cancer (30 percent for those taking only estrogen, and 100 percent for those taking both estrogen and progestin) than the women who were not taking hormones. The women taking hormones were also significantly more likely to die of breast cancer than the women not taking hormones. To put the risk into perspective, the researchers calculated that there had been about 20,000 extra cases of breast cancer caused by HRT in the United Kingdom over the previous 10 years. Based on the difference of population size alone, even at the same rate of hormone use, there would have been an extra 94,000 cases of breast cancer in the United States in the previous 10 years as a result of women taking HRT. The total number of American women who developed breast cancer because of taking HRT was likely to be much higher than this, though, because women in the United States were about four times more likely to take HRT than women in the United Kingdom."- (page 70)

It was concluded through multiple research articles published in medical journals in the 2000s that women who took HRT for more than five years developed significant adverse health effects. Such adverse health effects included breast cancer, heart attack, strokes, dementia and Alzheimer's disease, blood clots, and possibly even other health complications including cardiac problems. It is stated that probably 94,000 women in the US were affected in ten years yet estrogen replacement therapy had been approved and prescribed since the 1940s. It is possible that a lot more women were affected due to the use of estrogen replacement therapy and combined replacement therapy. This describes how the pharmaceutical companies did not fully research the effects of estrogen therapy for postmenopausal women in 1940. It took 60 years later to prove that the increase of cancer cases in women was due to estrogen replacement therapy. There is the need to be skeptical of new medications and "vaccines".

Increased Corruption in the 1980s in Medicine

It seems that the 1980s was when medicine began to be increasingly corrupted by financial ties with big pharma and researchers from medical journal articles (newer statins). Cost saving H.M.O.'s and great primary care physicians were under attack from the socialist media for preventing the rising cost of medical care while also preventing chronic disease in patients. 

Great primary care and cost saving insurance H.M.O.'s were preventing medical costs from increasing substantially. Socialists despised that Americans were getting affordable quality care and began to state lies about how doctor visits were being rushed and that cost saving H.M.O.'s were not good. This led to increased medical costs with inflation of prices in the double digits. Quality of care also decreased because counseling the patient on preventative medicine was not remunerated economically while patient visit times were decreased. While lifestyle changes such as exercise, nutrition counseling, and smoking cessation have led to healthier lives without the need of newer, expensive, and brand name medication, patient counseling was not looked upon favorably by socialists (prevention of chronic diseases). This would describe why the patient doctor visit times were significantly decreased from an hour or thirty minutes prior to 1980s to fifteen minutes. (There was a psychiatrist that was let go for spending more than fifteen minutes per visit with her patients while being an amazing psychiatrist in the 2010s).

Why Medical Care Quality in the US Has Decreased Despite Higher Costs?

Dr. Abramson described that since 2004 the cost of medical care in the United States has increased significantly while the quality has not improved. It has been noted that the quality of care in the US has decreased because of big pharma's influence on primary care, changes in the doctor-patient relationship (decrease of time in doctor visits), and also because of the commercialization of medicine (despite no universal healthcare). On the measure of performance on the level of health, the US was number 72 in the world. 

"Despite the poor performance of the American health care system, our healthcare costs are simply staggering. In 2004, health expenditures in the United States are projected to exceed $6,100 for every man, woman, and child. How does this compare with other countries? The United States spends more than twice as much per person on health care as the other industrialized nations. Even taking into account our higher per person gross domestic product, the United States spends 42 percent more on healthcare per person than would be expected, given spending in healthcare in the other OECD nations. The excess spending on health care in the United States is like a yearly tax of more than $1,800 on every American citizen. (And still the United States is the only industrialized country that does not provide universal health insurance, leaving more than 43 million Americans uninsured.)"- (page 46)

The United States has increased spending in health care, yet the quality of the medical care has decreased according to surveys and statistics. Most of this is due to many factors dealing with envy and socialism. It is known that primary care medicine is vital and indispensible for a nation's good health. Nations with good and excellent health care have multiple primary care physicians. Almost 50% of physicians in countries with excellent healthcare are primary care physicians and not specialists (compared to less than 30% in the US). In the United States, there are more specialists than primary care doctors since socialist medical mentality has disdained primary care for its long hours, decreased pay, and the manner that primary care actually allows for preventative medicine to be practiced. Preventative medicine prevents chronic disease from becoming worse disease. (Specialists are still needed in countries with good healthcare, yet primary care physicians are actually given importance, respect, and are seen with admiration for preventing chronic disease through the patient-doctor visit.) The socialists in the US since the 1980s have attempted to portray primary care as "insignificant", low paying, too much work, and inane while giving positive support of other specialties. Younger doctors since the 1980s were discouraged from being primary care physicians while being led to high paying specialties creating a limited amount of primary care physicians. Less primary care physicians means less preventative care. Less preventative care means more chronic diseases. More chronic diseases means more spending on health care.) Do socialists prefer instructing preventative care or allowing for less preventative care and more chronic disease? Socialists prefer chronic disease and disdain preventative care. That is why primary care has been disdained by socialists in the US since the 1980s. 

There is also the manner that medicine is a practice that has increased litigation also since the 1980s. This is because socialists want patients and doctors to be hostile to each other instead of being partners in the improvement of health. Socialists wanted patients and doctors to be in conflict instead of working together. This has been seen in how litigation increased in the medical field causing doctors to order unnecessary testing based on patient requests or in order to prevent a negative patient visit to prevent litigation (this makes sense of why unnecessary tests and treatments have caused for medicine to increase in costs. Can not blame the physicians for this and rather can blame socialism (monopoly "capitalism"). The socialists probably caused for litigation to be seen in medicine after causing the decreased patient visit times from 30 minute to an hour visits prior to 1980 to 15 minutes.) Instead of only ordering needed tests and treatment, doctors had to order unnecessary tests in order to prevent litigation rather than not order tests. Litigation in medicine is from socialism. (Yet at the same time in 2019, pharmaceutical companies did not want individuals to litigate against pharmacutical companies and faulty covid experimental "vaccines".)

Another cause of increased spending in medicine while causing decreased quality of care has been the manner that pharmaceutical medications have been seen as the solution to everything. Instead, preventative care is more important to preventing disease. Expensive, newer, and brand name medication has caused increased costs in medical care. Part of the high cost of medicine is due to expensive medication that is not better than generics. Medicare also helped pharmaceutical companies prescribe newer and more expensive medication instead of generics in the 2000s. Dr. Abramson described how some of the dangerous medications (Pravachol, Lipitor, Vioxx, Celebrex, Actonel, and Fosamax) were among the most prescribed to medicare recipients instead of generic medication. Even tax payers had to pitch in to pay for expensive bad meds in the 2000s. The newer and more expensive bad medications may have also caused strokes, heart attacks, osteoporosis, and falls that also increased medical costs while not increasing quality of care. This describes why medical care has decreased in quality while increasing in cost. 

This is also with the understanding that there is no universal healthcare in the US. Instead there are faulty covid experimental "vaccines". Not the best of times.

The Doctors and Scientists That Told Individuals to Not Take the covid "vaccines"

 The Doctors and Scientists That Told Individuals to Not Take the covid "vaccines"

In the year 2020, there were doctors and scientists who decided to tell individuals to not take the covid "vaccine". The doctors and scientists were from different nations including from China, Uruguay, Italy, Japan, and the United States. The doctors and scientists described that the covid "vaccine" was fairly recent (being approved in 9 months) and needed additional time to study the effects of the vaccine.

Scientists and doctors from different nations described that it would be better to not take the vaccine because it had not been studied rigourously for multiple years. This was in 2020 when the vaccine was being touted as the only manner to prevent death from covid, cure covid, and prevent additional cases. The scientists and doctors described that the arguments were flawed and that the covid vaccine needed additional time to be deemed effective and safe. 

Brave scientists and doctors in 2020 decided to speak truth than to tell individuals to vaccinate with an experimental vaccine. They were probably not liked by the socialists and yet spoke truth. The righteous physicians and scientists decided to tell the truth than to harm their patients. This was while the media was saying day and night that the covid vaccine was the only manner to end the covid pandemic. (The media never stated that individuals can boost their immune system with proper nutrition and exercise. Nor that a covid viral infection can lead to immunity.) Then there is the question of how can there be multiple variants of covid instead of the eradication of the supposed "virus" after vaccinations? Nations that vaccinated have variants, and nations that did not vaccinate do not have variants.

I spoke out in 2021 when the vaccines were noted to cause blood clots. In a specific nation (may have been Denmark), warning labels were placed to indicate that the covid vaccines may cause blood clots. This was when children of 5-11 years of age were the next group that was touted as needing vaccinations by pseudo-science socialists. Despite the incentives offered once the vaccination rate had decreased, individuals kept denying the vaccine. (Even with the incentive of a free beer, donut, scratch off or lottery ticket, and gift cards in the US). I think that the actual percentage of people vaccinated globally never passed 60% and may be anywhere from 50-60% of people receiving one vaccine. There were false reports online as top searches in 2023 or 2024 that stated that 80% of people globally were vaccinated with at least one vaccine. Seems highly unlikely because at 50% the rates of vaccination decreased significantly. Even with incentives, the media promoting the vaccine for 3 years on the news, and additional covid vaccine commercials, individuals refused vaccinations. In 2022 (2 years after saying that all covid vaccines were the same in 2020), Moderna covid vaccines were noted to contain double the mRNA quantity as vaccines from Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Aztra Zeneca. The double quantity of mRNA may explain the adverse health reactions including strokes, blood clots in the lungs, anaphylactic reaction (severe allergic reactions), fatigue, generalized weakness, shortness of breath, and neurological symptoms. We can be grateful to GOD Almighty for good individuals who cared more about speaking truth than telling lies about an experimental vaccine. We can also keep learning about science and history so that we can avoid pseudo-science and lies. There is no doubt that the covid "vaccines" were invented by socialists. (The 1976 flu vaccines were also prepared in haste to an unknown viral strain and resulted in hundreds or thousands of individuals having side effects including death (the unknown 1976 flu virus caused only one death and few infirmities. Only one third of the US was vaccinated.) Dr. Sabin spoke out and said that the vaccine needed to be stored in case of pandemic and not used until there was the need. The vaccines were recalled in 3 months after physicians spoke out against the vaccine.)

Chinese Scientists Were the First to Speak Out Against the covid "virus"

At the beginning of the covid pandemic and the calls to vaccinate in 2020, Chinese scientists spoke out against taking the vaccine. Despite being in a communist country (not entirely communistic because capitalism has also been added recently yet there is socialism based corruption), Chinese ethical scientists described that the vaccine was too recent to vaccinate with the vaccine. The ethical Chinese scientists described that it was better not to vaccinate with the covid experimental "vaccines" in 2020 and while living in China. The courageous individuals decided to speak truth than say lies.

We can be grateful to GOD Almighty for amazing scientists and doctors who refused to speak lies for temporary wealth and pleasures. Instead they warned us to have healthy skepticism about an experimental "vaccine". The courageous scientists decided to warn everyone about not taking the covid vaccine. We learn that there are good people in the world who prefer to persevere with morality than deceive their bretheren with lies and falsehoods. The Chinese scientists were the first to speak out followed by an Italian doctor who also created a video on Youtube telling individuals not to vaccinate. Then there were Japanese doctors who also spoke out against the vaccine. Uruguayan Pediatricians also told the truth and said that the vaccine should not be taken. Finally, American Doctors also spoke out against the covid vaccine. There may have been other individuals from other countries who spoke out, but in 2019-2021, I remember reading or watching videos of scientists and doctors from those countries that spoke out against the vaccine. We can persevere with gratitude to GOD Almighty for helping us have healthy skepticism and for great Doctors and Scientists who spoke out in 2019-2021 against the vaccine.

Poland Kicked Out the Medical Establishment that Wanted to Vaccinate With an Experimental "vaccine"

There was the story in the 2020s that individuals in Poland had fought against the covid "vaccines" and denied the experimental "vaccines". Poland was among the least vaccinated nations with less than 30% vaccination rates. Poland had lived through tyranny due to nazi socialism and soviet socialism. Poland understood that socialism is the worst method of governance and was able to deny the "vaccine" created by socialists. Poland was able to improve with Catholicism and denying socialism. Despite going through persecution due to Hitler and Stalin, Poland abounded in the worship of GOD Almighty. Poland also had a magnificent leader in Pope John Paul II. Poland was able to improve significantly and persevere. 

Poland in the 2020s also kicked out the socialist doctors who attempted to vaccinate and promote lies. Individuals did not believe the lies of socialism and did not get vaccinated. Individuals also distrusted the socialist doctors that wanted to vaccinate arbitrarily with new "vaccines" approved in haste in 9 months. Poland described the importance of resisting misinformation, lies, and deceit. (It is most likely that brave Polish doctors also spoke out against the "vaccine" but may have been censored by the media or technological monopoly. Censored in the sense that individuals that spoke out were not top results online on Youtube and search engines. This could also have happened against other doctors from other nations who spoke out.)

Ukraine Had the Lowest Vaccination Rate

Ukraine was the nation that had the lowest vaccination rate in the 2020s with less than 18% of the population vaccinated. Ukraine also resisted the lies and denied the experimental "vaccine". Ukraine had gone through the persecution of Stalin and was able to persevere. Since Ukraine abounded after Stalin and the Soviet Union collapsed, socialists were envious. Ukraine is one of the most industrious nations because of Christianity, and was envied by socialists. Ukraine's population also abounded with Democracy and capitalism after the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s. Ukraine had impressive economical improvement for almost four decades until covid "vaccines" attempted to decrease economic growth. Ukraine is predominantly Christian Orthodox and denied the lies of socialists. Ukrainians also denied the covid "vaccine". 

Because most of the population declined the experimental "vaccine" and were industrious, there was probably unneeded warring. (Socialism hates that individuals can improve seen in how Stalin envied industrious individuals including Solzhenytsin and individuals of other ethnicities. The FBI socialists in the 1960s envied and persecuted Civil Rights Activists who were Christian, egalitarian, and good.) Most likely instead of actual warfare, there is persecution. This describes that racist Russians and racist Ukrainians that are socialists with the CIA are persecuting and causing destruction. Despite the persecution, righteous individuals go to Heaven and do not have to live during the times of adversity. (At least we know the times we are living in. We prefer autonomy, authenticity, and freedom to envy, cowardice, and sycophantry.)

6 Years Later and There is Still No Mention of the Origin of the covid "Virus"

The socialists still have not stated how the covid "virus" originated. There was the story of a supposed bat soup that was eaten in China that supposedly led to the covid "pandemic". From what I know, bats are reservoirs of rabies and not covid. I also doubt that there are Chinese individuals that eat bat soup. If bats were the reservoir of covid, then there would have been more cases prior to 2019. However prior to 2019, bats were only known to cause rabies. This describes that the pandemic is still not explained with logic nor with veracity. The covid "virus" has an illusive origin since it causes respiratory symptoms, yet no animal reservoir has been identified (i.e. Avian and Swine flu). The other cause stated was close contact with individuals that had respiratory symptoms. Yet the "virus" has not been gathered, studied, or sequenced? Even the 1918 virus was able to be gathered, studied, and sequenced successfully and that was in the past century, but not the covid "virus" in 2019?

The socialists stated no social gatherings because it may lead to covid infections, yet there is the question of where the virus originates from? There was a commercial on the TV in 2020 that stated that young individuals should not speak to their elder family members because they can spread covid. The commercial seemed disingenous and propaganda. I still spoke to older family members and even an acquaintance of a family member about not getting vaccinated with the covid "vaccine" since it was created in 9 months and not 8-10 years. I told them not to trust the lies and to not get vaccinated. The older family members did not develop covid infection from a conversation. So the commercial (in a Mexican TV channel) probably did not want youth to learn from grandparents who probably have healthy skepticism, wisdom from experience, and have lived through the Great Depression, First World War, Second World War, Cold War, Civil Rights Movement, Collapse of the Soviet Union, 9/11 and destabilization of the Middle East, Collapse of the Banking System in 2009, Avian Flu, Swine Flu, E. Bola outbreak, and still had motivation, encouragement, healthy skepticism, and a sense of humor. In 2021, I still spoke to my grandparent and her friend that they did not need a covid vaccine and also in 2021 spoke out against the covid "pandemic" and experimental vaccine propaganda.

Removal of the Treatment of covid

It was noted by physicians that the medication that most worked against covid infection was Hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine is effective against malaria infections and was discovered to be effective against the covid virus. There were physicians who said that once Hydroxychloroquine was given to patients with moderate to severe respiratory symptoms, they resolved. Physicians stated that the medication was a good medication against covid. After 2021, the medication was removed. The medication that was helping the most was removed from the US. This is a big discrepancy concerning the covid narrative.

Doctors still decided to treat covid infections with high doses of Vitamin C and oxygen. Individuals who had respiratory symptoms improved significantly with high doses of Vitamin C. We can keep using Vitamin C in order to help boost our immune system. Vitamic C helps create biochemical reactions that boost the immune system and prevents disease. Vitamin C is not only a great supplement but can serve as treatment against cold and flus. We can persevere making sure that we eat nutritional food and exercise almost everyday 30 minutes a day except Shabbath.

Different Side Effects (Symptoms) From covid "vaccines"

Another incongruency about the covid "pandemic" was how covid "vaccines" were causing different symptoms. There were reports that covid experimental "vaccines" may have caused different side effects. The side effects included respiratory symptoms like shortness of breath, cough, and wheezing. However the vaccine also caused pulmonary embolism or blood clots in the lungs and brains of certain individuals. Some individuals developed lethal anaphylactic reactions (a young med student vaccinated once and did not survive). Other individuals may have developed Guillen Barre syndrome that leads to arm and leg weakness and neurological symptoms. Others developed fatigue and generalized weakness.

Instead of being recalled once side effects were noted in 2021, the vaccines were promoted in the media everyday for 3-4 years and with additional commercials. Then they wanted to vaccinate 6 month olds twice. The covid "vaccine" propaganda in 2020 may have been very similar to the 1976 experimental "vaccine" mass vaccination campaign to a flu strain of unknown origin except that the 1976 experimental vaccine was recalled in three months after reports of side effects. A large number of people denied the vaccine and only a third of the US population got vaccinated or 40 million of 120 million adults in 1976. So maybe only 50-60% of the global population is vaccinated once with a covid experimental "vaccine" after 6 years.

The Origin of covid variants

There are questions as to how the variants began? We know that the most vaccinated nations have variants while the least vaccinated nations do not have covid infections nor variants. It could be that the covid "vaccine" is the source of the variants. This is because nations and states that vaccinated a large portion of their population had variants. Nations and states that did not vaccinate and refused the covid "vaccines" did not have variants. There were variants in different nations that were vaccinated including reports of variants in China, India, France, and Democrat states and districts in the US during the 2020s (although there were skeptical individuals who did not vaccinate from those nations and states). Meanwhile no infections nor variants were reported in the least vaccinated nations. The statistics also seemed inflated and cooked. 6 nations were described being >99% vaccinated when even the Polio vaccine did not reach more than 70% vaccination in the 1950s. (This was when people who did not vaccinate with the polio vaccine had the risk of getting poliomyelitis and the weakening and paralysis of lower limbs.) It was stated that 9 billion vaccines were administered the first year, yet only 28-32% of the population was vaccinated once during the first year. That would be 2-3 billion vaccines administered and not 9 billion (No one vacccinated 4 times in the first year.) In the following years (2022-2023), the number of people vaccinated once may have actually been 50-60% at most and that was with incentives. The statistic of 80% of the global population being vaccinated once seems false. It was during 2022 and 2023 that the variants began to emerge.

The variants began after the administration of the covid experimental "vaccines" and not before. There was no mention of variants before the "vaccines" in 2019 or before that time. This is while no source has been identified as the cause of covid. It may be that covid is not an organic or normal virus found in nature or an animal reservoir (swine or avian flu) and instead was used to cause fear and get people vaccinated with an experimental "vaccine" that causes variants. The variants may cause respiratory symptoms along with weakness and fatigue. We can have gratitude for not being vacinated once with an experimental "vaccine" that causes variants and even symptoms.

The Media Lied For Three Years and Never Mentioned Manners to Boost the Immune System

The mainstream media on television also lied for close to three straight years about how covid experimental "vaccines" were the only manner to end the "pandemic" when a nutritious diet and exercise are more efficient at boosting the immune system. Experimental "vaccines" were touted as the only manner to eradicate the covid "virus" but did not mention that the immune system is resilient and can develop immunity to a viral infection. The media lied and said that individuals do not develop an immune response to covid, yet covid is a virus. A virus can be eliminated by the immune system. It may also be that the covid experimental "vaccines" may harm the immune system. The immune system gets better with age after combating viruses, bacteria, microorganisms, and parasites. The immune system of an individual gets better after combating pathogens. Exercise and a nutritious diet also helps improve the immune system. The news media never stated this despite promoting the experimental "vaccine" for 3 years almost every day and also having commercials. It could be that the experimental covid "vaccine" may actually cause health complications, adverse side effects, and variants. The solution to the covid variants was administrating more experimental covid "vaccines".

The media also did not say where the variants occured from nor the source of the covid virus. The covid experimental "vaccine" may be responsible for adverse health outcomes and increased number of variants. The covid "vaccine" may be worse than the covid virus. The covid virus also was noted to have a high survival rate of 95% on some sources and 99% on other sources. Malaria, E. bola, and West Nile virus are more lethal than covid and yet some of those diseases do not have vaccines.

Medical Journal Articles on covid Are Not Truthful

I read journal articles concerning covid vaccines and side effects and they seem rather false. Articles on the covid experimental vaccines described that there were few cases of side effects from vaccinations. It may be that the journal articles under reported known cases of side effects and adverse reactions. Some articles stated that there was only ten cases of adverse side effects, when it may be in the thousands or hundreds of thousands based on the number of side effects of the 1976 experimental flu vaccine of unknown strain. There were journal articles on the free database, Plus One, yet the articles did not seem very truthful. The articles did not seem to be speaking the truth and possibly underreported known side effect cases. 

There may be disinformation on medical journal articles since the 2000s. Dr. Abramson described that since the 2000s, even once prestigious and honest medical journal articles including the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) have also published lying articles from pharma company sponsored research seen in Celebrex and Vioxx. It is possible that the adverse side effects of pulmonary embolism (blood clots), chronic cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, chronic generalized weakness, Guillen Barre syndrome, anaphylactic reactions, and reporting of variants may not be truthful and underreported. The correlation and association of increase of variants and increased applications of experimental "vaccines" may also not have been made or validated (not the best of times when even medical journals lie).

Pharmaceutical Companies Did Not Tell The Amounts of Ingredients in the Vaccine

Initially in 2020 when the covid "vaccine" was created, pharmaceutical companies did not state the amount of mRNA in each different vaccine. Multiple articles stated that all four vaccines were the same. In 2022, it was stated that the Moderna vaccine had twice as much mRNA as other vaccines. One dose of Moderna covid "vaccine" was the equivalent of two doses of the Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Aztra Zeneca vaccines. It may be that adverse health effects occured in individuals that took multiple doses of Moderna vaccines. Other vaccines may have also caused adverse health effects and symptoms. 

It is also noted that some vaccines had aluminum ingredients in the ingredients label. Aluminum does not go in the blood nor in the muscles being toxic. The amount of aluminum also was not indicated. The ingredients are described in the label in descending order but not the actual amount. This may have been done intentionally while not actually telling the actual mililiters or microliters of the amount of the ingredients. The covid "vaccines" may have been promoted to cause adverse health effects to an "unknown strain of covid virus" (similar to the 1976 "vaccines" of "unknown flu strain") and also cause variants.

Denied the Job of covid surveillance monitor

After medical school not working out, I went back to work part time jobs including Patient Satisfaction Surveyor conducting interviews with patients to know how they felt about their appointments. I also was working another part time job concurrently that was English and Spanish Interpreter (while writing in my blogs). At the Interpreter job I was being gangstalked by socialists from the past and left that job. I kept applying for other jobs during the covid pandemic in 2021 including covid surveillance monitor. (I was surprised that despite applying to 100s of jobs, I was not receiving interviews. At that time I began to reason that we are not living in the best of times.)

I received the chance to interview for covid surveillance monitor but denied the interview for the job. The covid surveillance monitor position seemed to attempt to help prevent the spread of covid while in retrospect it was probably additional stalking from the system against people who probably were given covid. I was probably given covid in 2018 while in med school. I had a cold that was worse than usual while taking exams, yet passed my exam for the Immunology block. I can not confirm that it was covid but the cold symptoms were worse than a common cold. Either manner I received immunity from the covid virus and did not need to take 4 experimental "vaccines" (especially after learning about immnology in med school). Hallellu JAH! I think that the covid surveillance monitor position actually wanted to stalk people who were given covid and survived. When people got other communicable diseases, there were no Swine flu, Malaria, or West Nile Virus  surveillance specialist position in 2009 or 2021. I think the socialists wanted to keep stalking people who survived covid infections with "calls of concern". I think most people had healthy skepticism and did not answer the phone calls or doubted the intention of the socialists. (That "job" position was created by socialists.) After some months in 2021, that job position was no longer on job posting sites meaning that people did not answer or that it was a temporary position. I am grateful to GOD Almighty allowing me to have healthy skepticism about covid propaganda and not having to stalk through the covid surveilance monitor position and much less promote the "vaccine".

Figures of History and Individualism is meant to remind us that there are good people despite the lies of the snake. While the snake says that "everyone sins and is evil," the reality is that there have been and there are individuals who are good, positive, practice integrity, and hate evil. We can persevere practicing civil disobedience, pacifism, and worshiping GOD Almighty above everything of this temporary and imperfect world. We can persist acknowledging that GOD Almighty is everything to us and deny the lies of the snake.