The Physicians Who Counseled Patients on Dieting and Exercise in the 2010s and Were Removed

The Physicians Who Counseled Patients on Dieting and Exercise in the 2010s and Were Removed

In the 2010s, there were a few stories of physicians who had counseled patients on the need to eat healthy diets and exercise instead of prescribing pharmaceutical medications. The physicians were noted to focus on preventitive medicine in their clinical private practice instead of primarily prescribing pharmaceutical medications.

There were a few stories that described that because the physicians were choosing to educate their patients on preventitive care instead of choosing to heavily suggest prescribed medication, the preventitive care physicians supposedly committed self-harm yet were industrious and cared about their patients.

This was described in the 2010s when pharmaceutical companies not only were trying to keep increasing the number of prescriptions prescribed but also attempting to remove opposition to the prescribing of pharmaceutical medications and oppose preventitive medicine in private practice of physicians. The physicians most likely did not commit self harm and were actually envied.

It is quite possible that because the physicians were not prescribing statins and newer, expensive, and less efficient medication that has been shown to actually increase side effects and adverse effects (such as Vioxx, Celebrex, Fosamax, and Actonel,), they were envied and persecuted. There were a few cases that described that the physicians were choosing to offer preventitive medicine counseling that has shown to improve people's health instead of prescribing newer and significantly expensive medication that has shown to cause sgnificant side effects. (We can persevere eating a healthy diet and exercising while avoiding false prophets and bureaucrats who envy industrious and righteous individuals. We can also deny covid experimental "vaccines". At least we know the times we are living in. )

The Scientists Whose Plane Fell and Had Developed a Treatment Against a Type of Cancer

 The Scientists Whose Plane Fell and Had Developed a Treatment Against a Type of Cancer in the 1970s or 1980s

There was a story of a group of scientists that had supposedly found a cure for cancer. (I think that it may have been for a type of cancer and not cancer in general because there are different types of cancer.) The scientists had worked on a treatment or medication that would help treat a type of cancer. After working on a treatment, they made a medication or treatment that supposedly cured a type of cancer.

The scientists were then invited to a conference to present their findings. I do not recall if it was after the conference or before traveling to the conference that the scientist's plane in which they were traveling fell and plummeted. The scientists did not survive the plane crash and died in the supposed accident.

I do not recall if this was in the 1970s or 1980s that the plane crash happened. The scientists had created an amazing treatment against a type of cancer and most likely were envied by some socialists in the medical community. The scientists were probably industrious and efficient and instead of being rewarded and appreciated, were probably envied.

There are theories that state that the CIA was responsible for the plane accident. This would not be a surprise because we already read about how MLK and JFK were envied by the FBI and socialist racists. The FDA has also denied an amazing new drug (that treated muscular dystrophy or myasthenia gravis) that passed all medical stages of testing only to be denied without any reasonable explanation. 

Michael Debakey

 Michael Debakey

Michael Debakey was a cardiothoracic surgeon who was able to work well into his hundreth birthday. Debakey was able to be industrious despite his older age and never slowed down. Debakey was able to be one of the top surgeons if not the greatest surgeon of all time. Despite cardiothoracic surgeries being complicated and intensive, Debakey did not slow down and kept operating on patients well into his centenarian age. 

It was noted that Debakey's hard work and dedication was greatly appreciated by patients and physicians. While socialists have attempted to make hard work and self-discipline seem outdated, Debakey's labor describes how being disciplined and dedicated are virtues that are important and needed. Instead we can choose to remove vices from our lives like slothfulness and immaturity and decide to persevere with industriousness and positivity.

Debakey not only kept being industrious in his old age, but also was able to create inventions for heart surgery that helped patients survive surgery. Debakey never stopped working throughout his life and described the importance of being industrious instead of slothful. Debakey is accredited with having made scientific innovations that have helped patients with heart surgery. Being surgeon and inventor, Debakey's life describes the importance of using our talents and time for good. It is estimated that Debakey conducted 50,000 cardiothoracic surgeries throughout his life being that they are complex surgeries that take a long time to complete.

Debakey's work ethic describes that it is possible to persevere being productive and hardworking despite discouragements from socialists and communists who hate hard work and dedication. (The worst part is not that they hate hard work and dedication but that they also do not want others to improve based on hard work and dedication evidenced in the last decade and unmissable with the covid "vaccines".) The socialists neither catch, pitch, nor let others bat. We can choose to be distinct and learn about positive examples who did not want to know anything about socialism and vices.

The Female Surgeon in Her 80s or 90s Who Kept Being Industrious

 The Female Surgeon in Her 80s or 90s Who Kept Being Industrious

There was the story of a female surgeon in Europe who was able to keep being productive and industrious despite being in her 80s or 90s. Despite being in her older age, she was still working conducting surgeries in the operating room. This describes that age is not a burden and instead can be seen as something positive. There are individuals who kept on being industrious despite being in their older age.

The female surgeon is not the only positive example being that there have been industrious individuals who kept working described in the psychiatrist, Viktor E. Frankl, and cardiothoracic surgeon, Michael Debakey. There are stories of amazing individuals who kept being industrious in their profession without decreasing in productivity despite their age. 

We learn that the grandparents generation was quite impressive because they instructed the value of industriousness, humbleness, self-improvement, speaking truth, and contructively criticized slothfulness and being a busybody. We can have gratitude for such great examples of perseverance who kept being positive despite the times that they lived in the past century. 

The previous century was not the greatest due to the great depression, World War I, World War II, and the Cold War, along with this century that has had the destabilization of the Middle East, banking system collapse in 2009, new diseases seen in swine flu and avian flu, E. bola, antibiotic resistant TB and yet they kept being positive and instructing truth.

The Psychiatrist Who Was Dismissed For Spending Too Much Time With Her Patients

 The Psychiatrist Who Was Dismissed For Spending Too Much Time With Her Patients

There is the story of a Pediatrician Psychiatrist who was dismissed from her work for being a great physician. The physician was noted to be positive and genuine. I was able to speak to the Psychiatrist while shadowing, and she motivated others around her. Despite having a busy schedule, she took time to be kind to everyone. 

It was noted that the Psychiatrist was kind and efficient. After a specific amount of time shadowing, it was noted that the physician was dismissed from her work for spending too much time with her patients. She was not dismissed for spending too little time, but for spending too much time with her patients. 

It was noted in the 2000s that reimbursements for psychiatric counseling were being decreased. This was while psychiatric medication was being peddled as the cure for psychiatric conditions. There is the theory that the pharmaceutical companies wanted psychiatric meds to be prescribed more heavily. The Psychiatrist was probably actually helping patients by spending time in counseling instead of prescribing psych meds.

Because the Psychiatrist spent time counseling the patients, she was probably dismissed. It is interesting to note how she could be dismissed when she was positive and encouraging. The most obvious reason could be that she decided to give psychiatric counseling instead of prescribing psychiatric meds. Despite the dismissal, it is interesting to know that there are individuals that are ethical and moral.

Patch Adams

 Patch Adams

Patch Adams is a real life physician who was able to enter medical school in his fortys. Patch Adams had worked multiple jobs before deciding to be a pre-med student and apply to medical school (prior to covid). Patch Adams was accepted and was a medical student who was disliked and hated by other medical students. Patch Adams did not care that he was disliked and kept having a sense of humor and empathy.

Patch Adams was disliked for being individualistic, independant, having a sense of humor, and beign positive. This probably happened in the 1970s or 1980s. Patch Adams was an amazing student and was able to be a physician who created a free clinic for individuals who could not obtain medical care due to the high prices of medical care. Patch Adams was able to practice empathy and goodness by providing free medical care. 

We learn that Patch Adam's story was impressive because we were able to see that individuals can be independant and different from everyone else. We learn that Patch Adams was not exactly the same as everyone else. Patch Adams described that medicine is a science and also an art. Medicine requires both extensive knowledge of science and also genuine empathy. We learn that Patch Adams was authentic and also practiced genuine empathy. 

The story of Patch Adams allows us to know that individuals can choose to be different, authentic, responsible, and good despite the opposition, adversity, and envy that they go through. Patch Adams did not allow the discouragements to change him from being a positive individual who cared about others. We learn that Patch Adams allows us to know that we can choose to practice genuine empathy and have filial love for humanity instead of hate and bitterness. We can choose to be authentic, positive, good, and unique while being far apart from discouragers and enviers and deny experimental covid "vaccines".

Jane Loevinger

 Jane Loevinger

"Loevinger's theory combines ego psychology with moral development, and in that sense is not a 'typical' psychodynamically based theory." -Adult Development and Aging by Susan Krauss Whitborne (page 194)

Loevinger was a psychologist who theorized that individuals have a sense of morality that causes them to improve in 1976. Loevinger created a theory that described that individuals are meant to develop responsibility, autonomy, self-discipline, and individuality. Individuals have the autonomy to choose to be independant and individualistic. We learn that Loevinger described six stages of development where individuals can choose to be independent and individualistic or not. Individuals who choose to learn from experiences, develop empathy, and are responsible tend to value individuality.

The first stage or Conformist stage describes individuals who conform to the standards of a group in order to avoid disapproval. These individuals stereotype others and also are mostly concerned about appearances and reputation. Individuals can mature and are able to be self-aware and gain an understanding of morality. The individual matures and develops responsibility that allows him to improve to stages that describe understanding the importance of ethics and morality or the Conscientious-Conformist level and Conscientious stage. The individualistic stage describes that individuals are able to develop empathy and morality.

Individuals are described being autonomous and also wanting to understand the importance of responsibility and morality. Individuals who decide to practice responsibility and empathy are able to improve. Jane Loevinger's theory describes how individuals learn from life experience and are able to regulate emotions, practice empathy, have self-discipline, and understand the importance of morality in life.

Jane Loevinger described that for an individual, the highest level of development consisted in attaining individuality and responsibility. Individuals are able to mature throughout life and choose to be independent, individualistic, and responsible. This theory of development by Loevinger emphasis that individuals are meant to improve throughout life attaining an understanding of ethics, self-discipline, responsibility, and individuality. We can learn to be righteous and responsible and improve each day. Psychologist have described the importance of individualism and responsibility in our day to day lives so that we express our true self and abilities. This prevents conformism that wants individuals to hate and envy others because of their uniqueness and differences.

Erik Piaget

 Erick Piaget

Erik Piaget was a psychologist who was able to develop a theory describing the development of individuals from childhood to adulthood. Erik Piaget described that individuals mature and seek to practice genuine empathy and kindness. We learn that positive psychology describes the importance of learning and improving each day and also the need to be kind to others. We learn that Piaget described different stages of development that allow individuals to keep improving and maturing. 

Individuals choose to improve by having meaning and purpose and being industrious. This is seen in the industry vs. inferiority stage and identity achievement vs. identity diffusion stage. Individuals prefer to develop a sense of self instead of going through life thinking that life is meaningless and without purpose. Individuals prefer to find meaning and purpose rather than be nihilistic. Individuals also prefer to be industrious.

Erik Piaget described four stages that individuals go through during their adult life. While the stages may not be in chronological order, they describe that individuals are meant to mature and be kind to others. The stages in adulthood describe the importance of generativity over stagnation and ego integrity (self integrity and not narcissism) over despair. It is described that individuals are meant to practice empathy and help others instead of being narcissistic and envying others. Individuals also choose to give instruction, knowledge, wisdom, and correction instead of being egotistic and selfish.

The only stage that is questionable and can be criticized constructively is the intimacy vs. isolation stage in young adulthood (although being single is not equal to being isolated). This specific stage describes that individuals choose to be in a relationship with the intention to get married and have a family rather than stay single. There is the manner to have meaning and purpose in the worship of GOD Almighty without needing to be in a relationship or married. It is not necessary to be married in order to be happy. There are individuals that did not get married and instead used their time for the worship of GOD Almighty and had amazing lives. Due to the times that we are living (not the best of times), it is understandable that people do not want to start relationships nor get married. The other stages do describe the manner that people mature with age and want to improve themselves and others. Individuals choose to practice genuine empathy instead of envying others. 

The Importance of Generativity

Generativity means being able to impart wisdom and knowledge to others. This is described being a form of empathy that describes that individuals tend to want to help others improve. We learn that when individuals mature and develop positive qualities, they tend to help others learn about being disciplined and industrious. Positive individuals tend to acknowledge the importance of generativity in their lives as they age instead of being envious and selfish. Generativity applies to wise and righteous older individuals that prefer to help others improve with knowledge and wisdom rather than be selfish and envious. 

This can be described in righteous individuals that have decided to instruct and offer correction and reproof to younger individuals seen in preachers, priests, Christian believers, and grandparents instead of seeing younger individuals as a burden, competition, or unimportant. We learn that righteous individuals prefer to see the importance of all human individuals and enjoy to share their wealth of knowledge and wisdom to others so that they do not go into the road of destruction and envy. Generativity prevents stagnation because individuals are helping others practicing genuine empathy instead of hating others based on being younger. This describes that older righteous individuals still have meaning and purpose by being able to instruct correction and reproof despite having an older age seen in Viktor E. Frankl who was still instructing logotherapy in his older age. 

Identity Achievement vs. Identity Diffusion

One of the stages of Erik Piaget's theory of development describes that individuals are meant to have meaning and purpose in their lives. This is consistent with Viktor E. Frankl's logotherapy that describes that individuals are meant to have meaning and purpose in their lives. This is because having meaning and purpose allows us to persevere even when there is tribulation, persecution, or envy. Piaget described that when choosing to have meaning and purpose or be nihilistic, it is better to persevere with meaning and purpose. We learn that we can have meaning and purpose in the worship and preaching of GOD Almighty and in obeying the commandments of Moses.

Viktor E. Frankl described that one of the biggest dangers of his times was the false philosophy of nihilism. Nihilism has the intention to lead individuals far from the worship of GOD Almighty by telling temporary lies that there is no meaning and no purpose in life. This leads to jadedness and cynicism that then leads to the practice of sin and idol worship. By having meaning and purpose in the worship of GOD Almighty, we do not allow the snake to deceive into the practice of sin and idol worship based on negative emotions. Positivity is also hated by post-modernism because it allows individuals to be happy and practice gratitude. We are created to be happy and grateful instead of bitter and envious. These different stages also describe how individuals have autonomy to decide if they want to improve and develop qualities or not.

The Value of Industriousness

Erik Piaget described that when individuals are given the choice to be industrious versus being slothful, individuals choose to be industrious. This is part of adult development and describes that individuals choose to improve themselves rather than be stagnated and indisciplined. Piaget described this stage as the industriousness versus inferiority stage. We learn that taking our work with responsibility and dedication allows us to develop additional qualities and virtues. Being irresponsible and lazy causes a decrease in qualities and may lead to vices. Piaget described that industriousness is preferred over laziness. 

Individuals that are industrious are more likely to be positive, have a clear sense of self, be individualistic, responsible, and also choose generativity over being envious of others. Generativity allows individuals to keep having meaning and purpose instead of being nihilistic and selfish. Being industrious allows individuals to realize the value of generativity and having a sense of self. Understanding the value of hard work and dedication allows us to keep developing ourselves and prevents us from believing the lies of nihilism and atheism that want to lead to immaturity, irresponsibility, laziness, and selfishness. Discipline and dedication are valuable traits that prevent laziness and intemperance.

Vaillant

 Vaillant

"Humor- being able to laugh at an unpleasant or disturbing feeling or situation."- page 195  Adult Development and Aging

The psychologist Vaillant described that there are coping strategies that can be used to eliminate negative emotions from our lives. Mature individuals tend to use humor and altruism to remove negative emotions. Psychologists have described that humor is important in removing negative emotions and also boost the immune system and protect the cardiovascular system. Laughter has shown to decrease stress hormones and allow individuals to feel better. Humor can also remove negative ideas and obsessive compulsions.

Altruism allows us to be industrious and turn negative emotions into positive behavior and action to help others. Sublimation allows individuals to turn negative emotions into industrious work including writing and exercising. These strategies prevent us from using negative coping strategies seen in projection and acting out. Positive coping strategies help us turn negative emotions into productive work. At the same time we remove negative emotions, we can be industrious.

"Projection- attributing unacceptable ideas and feelings to others"- page 195

We learn that negative coping strategies include projection that describes an immature individuals need to project their negative emotions or negativity unto others. Projection is used by narcissists and negative individuals in order to cause negative emotions. We learn that we can remove negative emotions instead of using the negative emotions that tend to drain the individual.

Another negative coping strategy is acting out that happens in individuals who can not dominate the emotions. Negative individuals act out of negative emotions complaining, gossiping, and yelling and have not learned positive coping strategies. We learn to persevere utilizing positive coping strategies and removing negative coping strategies. Vaillant described that individuals who are mature are able to utilize humor and altruism to remove negative emotions. We learn that the socialists have attempted to prevent humor from being appreciated because humor actually helps develop resiliency and positivity. Humor removes the negative emotions.

There Are Psychological Studies That Prove That Gratitude and Empathy Protect Against Cardiovascular Disease and Depression

"Much of the interest in the topic of health and personality has centered on the type A behavior pattern, a collection of traits thought to increase a person's risk of developing cardiovascular disease."- (page 200)

"Men who had high levels of personality risk [type A] also showed greater increases over the course of the study of both C3 and C4."- page 200

There are studies done by psychologists that have shown that being hostile towards others and practicing negative emotions causes cardiovascular disease. Personalities that are type A meaning they are hostile and tend to be angry tend to develop cardiovascular disease because C3 and C4 protein levels increase with anger and hostility (Friedman and Rosenman, 1974) (Boyle et al, 2007). Studies have shown that people that are hostile towards others tend to develop depression. There are also studies that prove that having gratitude each day allows individuals to be healthier and protects the cardiovascular system.

Gratitude allows us to develop resiliency and helps us keep positive. Positivity has shown to help individuals live longer and protects against heart disease and depression. Practicing empathy helps us acknowledge that we can be positive and help others. This prevents us from being hostile and negative. Hostility without cause towards others has shown to cause negative emotions and also has a negative impact on health (Siegler et al, 2003). We can persevere having gratitude each day and practicing empathy while removing ingratitude and negative emotions from our day to day lives. 

The Importance of Self-Discipline

“It is possible that high levels of self-discipline relate to a greater tendency to be proactive in engaging in behaviors that are protective of health and to avoid those behaviors that are damaging to health" (Weiss and Costa, 2005).- page 201 of Adult Development and Aging by Susan Krauss Whitbourne

There are studies in Psychology that describe that self-discipline is important in persevering with good health. Similar to the studies of the importance of practicing gratitude and empathy, having self-discipline has shown to help individuals live healthier lives. In another study, having high levels of conscientiousness and self-discipline was related to having lower mortality risk over a three year period in a study with 1,000 individuals aged 65 to 100 years of age. The individuals were followed over a three to five year period and individuals who had self-discipline had a lower mortality risk.

This can be explained by the fact that self-discipline allows us to have structure and be dedicated to keep healthy behaviors while removing negative behaviors that do not help our health. Self-discipline helps us know that we need to exercise almost everyday and also make sure that we avoid risky health behaviors including smoking, drinking, and being hostile and angry. Psychologists in the 2000s described the importance of practicing gratitude, genuine empathy, and having self-discipline. Along with having a sense of humor, we can persevere practicing integrity and having a pleasant demeanor.

Developing Resiliency Worshiping GOD Almighty

There are studies in Psychology that state that there are specific actions that we can take to develop resiliency. It is known that practicing gratitude and being positive prevents individuals from having negative emotions. We learn that being self-didactic and exercising also helps develop resiliency. There are studies that state that individuals that have faith in GOD Almighty and are religious tend to live longer (after the covid “pandemic” we learned that churches were closed, yet this did not prevent us from keeping a zealous faith in GOD Almighty and having healthy skepticism concerning the socialists. (The socialists also tried to close gyms since exercise keeps us young.) We learned that the socialists do not like that individuals have faith because we are able to persevere with gratitude and happiness.)

"Religious participation as a predictor of mortality above the effects of physical functioning." (Lutgendorf et al, 2004) (page 62-63) The results of a multivariate correlational design study described that being religious decreased IL-6 levels (a harmful immune system factor that leads to inflammation and deleterious reactions). Individuals who attended church had lower mortality and a better immune system.

It was noted in a study in the 2000s that individuals who attended church were more likely to live longer and be resilient. This has also been noted in individuals that profess having faith in GOD Almighty. Psychologists have described since the 2000s that keeping faith helps individual's health and longevity. This describes that the Scriptures speak truth concerning the manner that worshiping GOD Almighty above everything helps us persevere and have good health. When we obey the commandments of Moses, we persevere without infirmities. There were studies with centennarians that described that individuals that were positive, grateful, religious, and humble tended to live longer. Some of them were still independent despite living more than a 100 years. This describes that we can take positive steps to keep practicing gratitude and persevere in the faith and worship of GOD Almighty.

Vaillant Disproved the Lie of the Midlife Crisis Myth

"The concept of the midlife crisis was first aired in the media when journalist Gail Sheehy in 1974 published a best selling paperback book called Passages: Man's Predictable Crises of Adult Life. This book, which was based on a study being conducted at the time by psychologist Daniel Levinson, described the supposed changes that occured at each decade marker of adulthood. The years of the early 40s, according to this view, were marked by inner turmoil and outer acts of rebellion against the placid, middle-aged lifestyle into which the individual was fated to slip by the 50s. Shortly after the publication of Passages, Levinson published his own best-seller called The Season's of a Man's Life, which was a collaborative effort of a team of Yale psychologists, psychiatrists, and sociologists (Levinson et al, 1978). This book focused exclusively on the experience of men in midlife through the analysis of interviews of 40 men ranging in age from the mid-30s to the mid-40s. The men in the sample tended to represent men from diverse backgrounds, with 10 from each of the following occupations: business executive, academic biologist, blue-collar worker, and novelist. In addition to these interviews the authors included informal analyses of the biographies of famous men and the stories of men portrayed in literature."- (page 210)

In the 2000s there was the myth of the midlife crisis seen in movies, series, books, and socialist propaganda that states that supposedly increasing in age causes depression and negative emotions in individuals. The midlife crisis lie was written by sociologists and socialists who were affluent individuals who stated that as an individual increased in age, they would go through a midlife crisis. This was a blatant lie and was written by socialists who did not have belief and did not worship GOD Almighty. They described that there is meaninglessness and a lack of purpose as individuals reach their fifth decade of life. Supposedly, there are negative emotions that occur due to a nihilistic perspective. The individual who wrote the midlife crisis theory was actually discouraged and attempted to make a theory based on his circumstances. The theory states that individuals have negative emotions due to realizing that they are halfway through their life. However, this is incongruent because no one knows how long they are going to live and if there is gratitude and meaning, there is no need to be negative and discouraging.

There were psychologists, psychiatrists, and sociologists who also attempted to validate the supposed theory by making surveys with forty or so individuals that were mostly affluent and a few individuals of the working class. Vaillant described that the so called midlife crisis is a lie because individuals keep having meaning and purpose throughout their lives. Vaillant initially agreed and then changed his mind and repudiated the theory describing that development creates transitions and transitions do not create development. This means that individuals that have meaning and purpose keep developing and improving themselves even when there are transitions in life such as difficult circumstances. The transitions are not the reason for development and instead it is the meaning and purpose that keeps us glad and resilient. There are multiple psychologists who have disproved the midlife crisis theory and have described that individuals have meaning and purpose throughout their lives regardless of circumstances. Viktor E. Frankl lived until 93 years of age and kept being industrious throughout his life being able to instruct reproof and logotherapy into his old age. Despite the envy of socialists, Viktor E. Frankl persevered being industrious throughout his life. The midlife crisis myth may have been written with the intention to discourage individuals into believing that they need to be nihilistic and negative about aging. Instead we learn that age is not a burden and in fact ethical individuals can get better with age seen in Viktor E. Frankl.

Psychologists That Disproved the Midlife Crisis Myth

There are multiple psychologists that disproved the midlife crisis myth. The psychologists described that the design of the study was flawed because while three fourths of the participants were affluent, educated, and priviledged, the study tried to generalize and extrapolate the findings to the general population. We learn that the study findings were not reproducible nor replicated by other psychologists describing that the study design was highly flawed (Whitborne). The interview questionnaires and data was also not available for comparion describing flaws in the design study. The lack of data and questionnaire answers from the original study indicated that there may have been lies told. When the study was replicated by other psychologists, they discovered that individuals do not actually have a midlife crisis and are stable. 

Mcrae and Costa described that individuals in their late thirties and early fortys do not have a midlife crisis. It was individuals who have high levels of neuroticism who were more prone to have a midlife crisis. The age of an individual was not indicative of a midlife crisis and instead it was the trait of neuroticism. Chronic psychological disorders were described being correlated with a midlife crisis instead.

Additional Lies of the Midlife Crisis Myth

The midlife crisis myth is another lie made up by socialists to discourage and lead to ingratitude. The midlife crisis myth is another of the many lies that socialists have come up with to lead to doubting and discouragements. There are individuals in their adult years who did not get discouraged by aging and instead persevered with faith in GOD Almighty without becoming  atheistic, nihilistic, and much less socialists. The midlife crisis myth also tells individuals to "resolve the polarity of their personality involving their masculinity and femininity" in their older years implying that individuals can be homosexuals. Individuals are either masculine males or feminine females and there is no polarity of personality to resolve. The midlife crisis myth may also have attempted to lead individuals to homosexuality and the practice of sin.

"Levinson regarded the midlife crisis to be a virtually universal process that has characterized human existance for at least 10,000 years."- (page 212)

We have only been on earth for about 5,990 years. (Atheist pseudo-science has stated that humanity has been on earth for 500 billions of years also). There are individuals that have persevered with faith in GOD Almighty (who did not care about fame) who did not get discouraged despite their increasing age and kept being industrious including Viktor E. Frankl, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Anatoly Fastenko, Dusya Chmill, the older Christian believers in the Soviet Union who never renounced their faith, Ronald Reagan, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Ludwig van Beethoven, the late Pastor John Wilkerson and Pastor Zacchariah, Priest Eziquio Trevizo, Michael Debakey, Pope John Paul II, Mother Theresa of Calcutta, priests, nuns, pastors, Christian believers, and grandparents.

The Anesthesiologist Who Volunteered Providing Medical Care to Countries Without Medical Care

 The Anesthesiologist Who Volunteered Providing Medical Care to Countries Without Medical Care

There was the story of a French anesthesiologist who provided medical care to regions that did not have a medical infrastructure. The anesthesiologist described how he took a significant pay cut in order to provide medical care to areas that did not have medical care (do not recall if this was in Latin America or Africa. This was with Doctors Without Borders prior to covid in the 2000s. Since covid there is the need to remain skeptical of experimental "vaccines")  

The physician described that despite the pay cut, he appreciated the manner to provide medical care to individuals who could not afford medical care. The anesthesiologist described that he was able to improve his skill set by providing medical care in areas that did not have state of the art equipment. Despite the circumstances, the physician was able to help others who could not afford medical care by providing anesthesiology services for surgeries.

The physician was surprised by how despite individuals living with modest resources, they were able to live with happiness instead of bitterness and envy. The physician could not understand how individuals could live being cheerful despite the modest resources that they had. The physician could not understand how individuals living in opulent cities were not happy despite having all the material resources.

This describes that materialism is not the source of happiness. It may be understood that the individuals with modest resources were religious and also had empathy. The physician was surprised by how individuals with modest resources cared more about others than material things. This describes how there are individuals who practice empathy and goodness with their skill set instead of trying to provide experimental "vaccines" to others. (There is the need to be skeptical of false prophets in these times who envy others.)

George Orwell

 George Orwell

Interpretacion a otros lenguajes

George Orwell was a literary critic and writer that wrote many essays and books. We learn that one of the most important books that George Orwell wrote was 1984 that describes a dystopian society where individuals are not allowed to think for themselves, and technology has attempted to remove autonomy, freedom, and empathy. We learn that George Orwell wrote against totalitarianism and communism. 

George Orwell wrote about the flaws and lies of communism that attempted to "appear" to help when in reality attempted to lead to hypocrisy, decreased autonomy, decreased empathy, and suppression of free thinking and the free market. We learn that "wrong-think" is a word derived from "group-think". "Wrong-think" signifies in 1984 the hatred from communist and totalitarian sycophants of individuals who think for themselves. Any thought that was different, unique, and non-conformist was deemed "wrong-think" by the totalitarian and communist dictators and sycophants. "Group-think" describes the inability of an individual to think for oneself and instead leads to the individual to choose to go along with the crowd that is common of sycophants. We learn that this describes oppressive and totalitarian dystopias that fail to help individuals and instead lead to difficulties, stagnation, vices, and destruction of the wicked in the long run seen in the collapse of the Soviet Union and Nazi socialism. This describes the importance of practicing responsibility along with autonomy so that autonomy does not lead to iniquity. 1984 describes the manner that communism and totalitarianism uses lies to cause individuals to believe things that are never true.

"Then the face of Big Brother faded away again, and instead the three slogans of the Party stood out in bold capitals: 

WAR is PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

        IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH"- 1984 (page 17)

In 1984, George Orwell describes an individual who is able to think for himself and resist the indoctrination of totalitarianism and communist like "group-think". Although, George Orwell wrote 1984 in 1949, the book is a warning against placing all hope and faith on repressive and totalitarian systems that only look to cause difficulties and stagnation.

George Orwell's critique for totalitarianism and communism is seen in 1984 where technology is used as a method to remove autonomy and freedom from individuals. We are able to understand the importance of free thinking, autonomy, freedom, and also responsibility. We are able to realize that with autonomy there is also the need to practice responsibility. 

George Orwell's Criticism of Socialism

“It had always been assumed that if the capitalist class were expropiated, socialism must follow; and unquestionably the capitalists had been expropiated. Factories, mines, land, houses, transport- everything had been taken away from them; and because these things were no longer private property, it must follow that they must be public property.”- (page 170)

George Orwell was able to criticize socialism in 1984. George Orwell described that socialism “appeared” to “favor” the working class while actually looking to prevent true capitalism from helping individuals improve themselves. George Orwell described how socialism is essentially the same as monopoly “capitalism” because the intention is to prevent individuals from all classes from improving themselves. We learn from history that socialism has never worked in all the nations that it has been implemented. Instead of creating a utopia, there is a bureaucracy that leads to dystopia. George Orwell was aware of this and wrote extensively about the dangers of socialism that only “appears” to want to “benefit” individuals, when the intention is to attempt to falsely accuse others, attempt to steal coveted resources, and lead to conflict. We learn that the history of the Soviet Union describes this in great detail in the Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. The socialists appeared to have “good intentions” while harboring hate, envy, bitterness, and coveting. We learn that we can leave socialism in the past and persevere obeying the commandments of Moses.

George Orwell describes in 1984 how socialism had caused for there to be no private property. There was only monopoly “capitalism” that is essentially socialism that seeked to prevent individuals from improving themselves. We learn that 1984 describes the truth of how socialism leads to barrenness and dystopia. Individuals could not create or be self-sufficient because that would cause envy and coveting. There were attempts to prevent individuals from learning, practicing autonomy, speaking truth, and having privacy. The socialism of 1984 did not just covet material resources, but also attempted to prevent individuals from being autonomous, truthful, self-didactic, and having privacy. Conversations were overheard by the Thought Police, and frienemies could essentially be Inner Party informants. The protagonist Winston described how he did not trust Parsons and Syme who were most likely informants. Winston described how if he decided to take a different route to a store or visit a new place, informants were listening and seeing his movements. Winston noticed that he was followed on different occasions and that informants were looking to overhear and observe his movements due to his actions including going to different locations and asking individuals about the past. The socialists did not want individuals knowing the truth about how individuals lived in the past because that would cause individuals to question the false narrative of the socialists. Big Brother had created “utopia” in 1984 through lies and if individuals knew the truth, then individuals would question the reality. We learn that Winston recalled that in the past there was abundance and goodness compared to the present. Yet, it was dangerous to say this because there were informants who were looking to accuse individuals who spoke truth. In socialism, there is the “appearance” of utopia while actually living under dystopia.

“Therefore, from the point of view of the new groups who were on the point of seizing power, human equality was no longer an ideal to be striven after, but a danger to be averted.”- (page 168)

George Orwell's Criticism of Technology

George Orwell was able to describe the manner that technology needed to be used with responsibility. We learn that George Orwell wrote against the misuse of technology and also against the dangers of socialism. In 1984, technology is used to attempt to remove freedom and liberty from individuals. We learn about individuals needing to participate in community activities whenever they were not at work or sleeping so that they did not have time for themselves. This was with the intention to lead to sycophantic behavior and prevent the individual from realizing the truth. We learn that specific activities were looked down upon. We learn that writing, reading truthful books, and solitary exercising was looked down upon. Reading books that spoke truth were destroyed and only approved and revised versions of the books were allowed. If individuals did not participate in community activities, they were accused of being traitors. Individualistic activities that reinforced the need to be independant and self-sufficient such as reading, writing, and learning were seen as dangerous to the socialist state. Big Brother was the individual that was the leader of the socialist technologic dystopia. We learn about the face of Big Brother that was an individual that was placed in advertisement boards and posters with the slogan “Big Brother is watching”. This describes the use of technology to attempt to lead to decreased freedom. Individuals in 1984 knew that they were being watched and that the intention was not to help the individual. We learn that individuals had a specific time during the day in which the television turned on by itself and led the individuals to listen to specific propaganda messages. This was with the intention to see and listen to the individual’s reaction to said propaganda. Individuals were always beeing watched through technology and informants.

If the individual reacted negatively or spoke negatively against the propaganda of the system, the Thought Police would remove the individual from society. George Orwell described the need to be weary and cautious about technology since it can be used to cause difficulties, decrease freedom, and lead to enslavement seen in the manner that individuals did not have freedom of speech and could not voice their true opinions for fear of being removed. George Orwell described that even a facial expression could cause the Thought Police to remove an individual. This describes that not even voicing an opinion, but a facial expression of disapproval was enough to remove the individual from existence. 1984 is fiction, yet describes the need to be skeptical of idolatry seen in the worship of technology. We are able to know that George Orwell saw the incongruencies and hypocrisy of socialism in his time and was able to describe the need to not believe socialist and communist temporary lies. 

Misuse of Technology and Informants in 1984

George Orwell described how in 1984 there were informants in addition to the use of technology to overhear and see individuals. The informants were in the form of the thought police or frienemies, individuals that “appeared to want to help” while actually being quite egoistic and parasitical. We learned about Syme and Parsons who were individuals that were negative and quite narcissistic. They were not to be trusted and were constantly asking the protagonist for favors. Aside from informants, we learned that the televisions were able to listen to and watch individuals. The televisions or telescreens were able to be turned on at a specific times of the day to lead to the listening of propaganda. We learn that the telescreens also were able to watch the individual. Despite having technological methods to reduce autonomy and freedom, there were also informants in 1984. This is interesting noting how technology use needs to be moderated by an individual so that the individual has control over technology and not the other way around. We learn to understand the use of technology yet not allow technology to become idolatry nor allow technology to restrict autonomy.

This is an interesting topic that George Orwell wrote about in 1949 describing how he had seen socialist nations attempt to restrict the autonomy and freedom of its citizens. George Orwell wrote extensively against socialist totalitarianism and fascism. We learn to understand that while technology can be used for good in order to learn science, history, literature, mathematics, languages, and integrity for the betterment of oneself and society, it can also be misused for decreasing autonomy, freedoms, liberties, and understanding. We can learn from 1984 about the need to persevere understanding that technology is a tool that can be used for good, but that must also be controlled by the individual. 

The Use of Informants in 1984

George Orwell described in 1984 about how there was distrust against informants and the thought police. There were helicopters that zoomed near buildings to see what individuals were doing. George Orwell described how individuals were not allowed to speak their mind because of the informants that existed. The thought police consisted of individuals that would falsely accuse other individuals concerning being traitors to the state while, in reality, they were attempting to prevent the truth from being spoken. The protagonist, Winston Smith, described that certain individuals lile Parsons and Syme could not be trusted because they were probably members of the totalitarian socialists in 1984. We learn that the fictious characters would ask Winston if he had specific basic items (for example shaving blades) to give them being that it was known that the items were decreasing in availability. While the propaganda from the telescreens stated that the items needed were abundundant, the reality was that they were not. The propaganda was changed constantly so that there was always a positive note being displayed, yet the propaganda was based on lies. We learn that lies were told by propaganda and the informants.

The informants were particularly negative and deceitful. Parsons would ask for favors to Winston constantly. In a specific occasion, Winston helped Parson's wife fix the sink in the apartment and was attacked by the children of Parson and accused of being a traitor by the children of Parson. Winston recalled how Parson's wife looked tired and weary from the misbehaving children. Winston described how the children would probably become informants and falsely accuse Parson's wife in the future. Parson's children also were impolite, misbehaved, and abusive, yet were encouraged instead of disciplined. The children were encouraged to participate in the Junior Spy League that taught them how to falsely accuse individuals of being traitors. George Orwell described how in socialism there are a lot informants and lies. This is interesting because in the Soviet Union, children were also informants and were able to falsely accuse adults. The codes of false accusations was given in three letter combinations so that even children could know what false accusation to use based on socialist lies.

Female Informants and Avoiding Lust

In 1984, George Orwell described that there were informants that attempted to accuse other individuals based on lies and envy. Informants followed Winston around to know if he took an alternate route to work or visited a different location. This was so that the informants could snitch to their managers so that the false system could maintain itself seeing that it did not like that the truth was spoken. We learned about Syme and Parsons who were false friends and actually informants who followed Winston around. There was also a female informant Julia who followed Winston around also. Julia appeared to be innocent and righteous while being adulterous and a snitch. Julia would follow Winston around with the intention of snitching and also tempting to lust.

1984 describes the need to be highly skeptical of socialists and communists who may be informants. Julia was a socialist who attempted to tempt Winston to practice fornication. We learn that Julia did not actually love or care about Winston and only looked to remove him. It is implied that Julia had a relationship with a socialist sycophant. Julia was also adulterous and an informant. 1984 tells us to be highly skeptical of socialist informants who envy others and female feminists/socialists who try to tempt to sin and idol worship.

Temporary Lies and Propaganda

George Orwell described how the propaganda stated that there was an abundance of material resources when in reality there was scarcity and the numbers were fabricated. This is consistent with Soviet socialist countries that stated that there was abundance when in reality there was scarcity based on the sins and vices being practiced. The envy and persecution against the most industrious did not help also. In 1984, there were multiple reports stating that each year had an increase of resources (for example boots) and positive numbers when, in reality, the numbers were lies. The lies not only applied to material resources but also to different stories concerning the perfect socialist society that existed in 1984. We learn that Winston was able to realize that the numbers were fabricated. He recognized that the numbers seemed rather false and were not truth.

Winston described how there was constant war between the three major nations. While Oceania was at war with Eurasia for multiple years, there were new reports that stated that Oceania was never at war with Eurasia and instead it was Eastasia. Such reports needed to be changed and it was Winston's job to constantly change the previous reports to newer reports. This was so that no one could figure out that lies were being told in 1984. This is interesting because George Orwell described the need to speak truth against fascistic and totalitarian socialism that attempts to lead to difficulties due to the authoritarianism and arbitrariness that exists. George Orwell hated socialism and was able to describe the discrepancies between the truth and the falseness of socialism. 

The Two Minute Hate

“In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance.”- (page 157)

George Orwell described in 1984 how hate and envy were needed in order to prevent individuals from improving. We learn that individuals within society in 1984 needed to attend the two minute hate propaganda in a theater or else be removed or vaporized. The Two Minute Hate consisted of a video of individuals that were enemies of Oceania. The warring soldiers of Eurasia were shown in the movie in order to stoke fear, hate, and anger. Individuals were encouraged to hiss, yell, and throw objects at the movie screen in order to foment hate. George Orwell described with great detail the manner that the socialist state wanted individuals to have anger, bitterness, resentment, and hate for no reason. Individuals were encouraged to participate in the two minute hate or else be deemed traitors.

"The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the real wealth of the world. Goods must be produced, but they not need be distributed. And in practice the only way of achieving this was by continous warfare. The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labor. War is a way of shattering into pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials that might be used..."- (page 157)

George Orwell was able to describe how socialism and communism wants individuals to have negative emotions instead of positive emotions. 1984 describes how individuals needed to participate in negative activities in order to not be considered seditious. Individuals in the movie theater would scream and hate for no reason. The movie described how Eurasia was the enemy of Oceania and needed to be defeated. This is with the reality that there was always war going on between Oceania and Eurasia. This describes how the socialist state only wanted negative emotions out of people instead of actually fomenting loyalty or patriotism. Winston described the manner that there was always war with other countries and that it was not about loyalty and instead about having negative emotions for no reason. George Orwell described the manner that he preferred pacifism to war. 1984 describes the absurdities of war and hate.

“As for the problem of overproduction, which has been latent in our society since the development of machine technique, it is solved by the device of continuous warfare.”- (page 171)

George Orwell's Criticism of War

“Even when weapons of war are not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labor power without producing anything that can be consumed.”- (page 157)

George Orwell was against authoritarianism, fascism, totalitarianism, and socialism. In 1984, we are able to see how warfare was used as a method of dividing people into different groupings so that they had hate and anger. George Orwell describes the reality of war being that it does not help anyone and only leads to difficulties. George Orwell was a pacifist who was against socialism and warfare. Pacifism describes the importance of living in harmony with one another understanding that there is no need for unnecessary conflict and division. We learn that true pacifists have spoken against war and the use of war knowing that it is not something that helps humanity. We learn that war is usually a last option and can be avoided through empathy, understanding, filial love, and dialogue. In 1984, war was so common that it was difficult to know when there were no wars in the past. We learn that there were three large nations that comprised the world. The nation of Oceania that was the Americas, Eurasia that was Europe, and Eastasia that was essentially Asia. The three nations were always at war. George Orwell described how warfare was used to produce goods that citizens could not use and was with the intention of not producing abundance of goods for the majority. This was with the intention to prevent individuals from living in harmony.

"If he were allowed contact with foreigners he would discover that they are creatures similar to himself and that most of what he had been told about them is lies. The sealed world in which he lives would be broken, and the fear, hatred, and self-righteousness on which his morale depends might evaporate."- (page 162)

There was also the description of how Big Brother and the Inner Party attempted to prevent individuals from learning about other cultures and other nations so that there would be enmity and strife instead of genuine empathy and harmony. This describes that division and war was used to cause negative emotions in individuals. If individuals decided to learn about other cultures and nations, individuals would understand that there is no need to hate others based on their nationality or ethnicity. 1984 described that the Thought Police and Inner Party attempted to prevent individuals from learning the truth because then individuals would realize that there is no need for hate, envy, strife, and conflict. George Orwell describes that individuals from Oceania were not allowed to learn about Eurasia and the only thing that could be safely mobilized between nation borders were bombs. This criticism is interesting because we learn that there is no need to hate others based on their race, ethnicity, or place where they were born. Instead we can learn from other cultures and nations so that we have empathy for others seeing how we are created to love GOD Almighty and respect humanity instead of being in conflict and strife without reason. 

Ludwig van Beethoven

 Ludwig van Beethoven

Ludwig van Beethoven was one of the greatest classical musicians of the last millennium and of all time. Beethoven was able to compose amazing symphonies and concertos. Beethoven was able to be industrious in his work so much so that it is described that he kept working even after going deaf. Beethoven was not only talented but also industrious in making good music.

We learn that Beethoven would compose some of the most beautiful classical music songs of all times. There were also other talented musicians including Vivaldi who created beautiful classical music. Beethoven is known for different classical compositions including the Fifth Symphony, Fur Elise, and Moonlight Sonata. Beethoven was able to keep being industrious into his mid fifties prior to passing away.

Beethoven was able to make music even when he went deaf. Beethoven was able to compose by using a tuning fork and kept writing music. Even while deaf, Beethoven was still able to compose great classical compositions describing the importance of remaining industrious despite age and circumstances. Beethoven's music kept being great despite his age and circumstances.

It is noted that most of the great classical musicians wrote for the worship of GOD Almighty seeing how their compositions were phenomenal and impressive. Beethoven kept being industrious despite going deaf. Beethoven is regarded as one of the best if not the best classical musician who was able to make large amounts of compositions while keeping a high quality to his music. Beethoven's compositions are regarded being some of the best of classical music and it is noted that his compositions got better with time. We can appreciate great music and learn to be industrious. We can choose positive music and encouraging music instead of discouraging and negative music.